Johnson v. Lopez et al
Filing
52
ORDER Granting Defendants' 50 Motion for Clarification. Discovery due by 5/19/2017. Motions due by 6/19/2017. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 7/19/2017. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 4/5/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
Lausteveion Johnson,
5
2:15-cv-00884-JAD-NJK
Plaintiff
Order Granting Motion for
Clarification
6
v.
7
Northern Nevada Correctional Center, et al.,
8
[ECF No. 50]
Defendants
9
10
Nevada state-prison inmate Lausteveion Johnson sues the Nevada Department of Corrections
11
(NDOC) and several prison officials and employees for a myriad of civil-rights violations. On
12
March 31, 2017, I granted Johnson’s motion for leave to file a second-amended complaint.1 In
13
granting the motion, I indicated that discovery had already closed, and I extended the dispositive-
14
motion deadline contained in the court’s initial scheduling order by 30 days. Defendants seek
15
clarification of that order, pointing out that the magistrate judge granted their motion to extend
16
discovery shortly before I granted Johnson’s motion for leave to amend, and that the dispositive
17
deadlines given in my order conflict with the extended scheduling order.2 Accordingly,
18
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants’ motion for clarification [ECF No. 50] is
19
GRANTED. The magistrate judge’s order granting the motion to extend discovery deadlines [ECF
20
No. 44] is the operative scheduling order. Discovery is due by May 19, 2017, the dispositive
21
motion deadline is June 19, 2017, and the proposed joint pretrial order is due by July 19, 2017.
Dated this 5th day of April, 2017.
22
23
_________________________________
____ _______ __ ____
__
__ __ _______
___
_ __
___
Jennifer A. Dorsey
Jennifer A Dorsey
n
y
United States District Judge
ed States District Judg
d t
trict
24
25
26
27
28
1
ECF No. 47.
2
ECF No. 50.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?