Maunder v. The Primadonna Company, LLC
Filing
14
ORDER Granting 13 Stipulation for Exception to Attendance Requirements for Early Neutral Evaluation.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 6/30/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
Case 2:15-cv-00918-RFB-GWF Document 13 Filed 06/29/15 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
WENDY M. KRINCEK, ESQ., Bar #6417
KAITLYN M. BURKE, ESQ., Bar #13454
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
3960 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937
Telephone:
702.862.8800
Fax No.:
702.862.8811
e-mail: wkrincek@littler.com
e-mail: kmburke@littler.com
Attorneys for Defendant
THE PRIMADONNA COMPANY, LLC
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
SUSAN D. MAUNDER, an individual;
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
THE PRIMADONNA COMPANY, LLC a/k/a
and d/b/a PRIMM VALLEY RESORTS;
EMPLOYEE(S) / AGENT(S) DOES 1-10; and
ROE CORPORATIONS 11-20, inclusive,
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
3960 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937
702.862.8800
Defendants.
Case No. 2:15-cv-00918-RFB-GWF
STIPULATION FOR EXCEPTION
TO ATTENDANCE
REQUIREMENTS FOR EARLY
NEUTRAL EVALUATION
SESSION
ENE DATE: July 30, 2015
ENE TIME: 9:00 a.m.
MAGISTRATE JUDGE C.W.
HOFFMAN, JR.
Defendant, The Primadonna Company, LLC (“Primadonna”), and Plaintiff, Susan D.
Maunder (“Plaintiff”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby submit this
Stipulation respectfully requesting an exemption from the Early Neutral Evaluation (“ENE”)
attendance requirements for Defendant’s insurance representative.
The Order Scheduling Early Neutral Evaluation (“ENE”) Session (Dkt. #11) sets the ENE for
July 30, 2015. It requires a representative of the insurance carrier with authority to settle this matter
up to the full amount of the claim to be present. Defendant requests an exception to this requirement
because although Defendant has an employment practices liability insurance policy, that coverage is
subject to a $250,000 retention. Based on the information presently available regarding Plaintiff and
Case 2:15-cv-00918-RFB-GWF Document 13 Filed 06/29/15 Page 2 of 2
1
her allegations in this lawsuit, there is no reasonable good faith possibility that Plaintiff’s claims
2
could exceed the retention level at this time. Indeed, Plaintiff’s initial disclosures include a damages
3
calculation of $29,433.64 in lost wages taking into account mitigation efforts. In light of the status
4
of the litigation and the relative settlement posture of this matter, it is Defendant’s belief that the
5
insurance coverage will not have any effect on the settlement negotiations at the ENE.
6
Additionally, Defendant will have a company representative available at the ENE session
7
who will fully and effectively participate in the settlement discussion and will have binding authority
8
to settle this matter on behalf of Defendant. Further, Defendant’s insurance representative will be
9
availability telephonically during the ENE if necessary. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request
10
that an Order be issued granting permission for Defendant’s insurance representative to be exempt
11
from personal attendance at the ENE scheduled for July 30, 2015.
12
13
14
Dated: June 29, 2015
Dated: June 29, 2015
Respectfully submitted,
Respectfully submitted,
_/s/ Christian Gabroy, Esq.____________
CHRISTIAN GABROY, ESQ.
GABROY LAW OFFICES
__/s/ Kaitlyn M. Burke, Esq._________________
WENDY M. KRINCEK, ESQ.
KAITLYN M. BURKE, ESQ.
LITTLER MENDELSON
15
16
17
18
Attorney for Plaintiff
SUSAN D. MAUNDER
19
20
21
22
Attorneys for Defendant
THE PRIMADONNA COMPANY, LLC
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: June_____, 2015
DATED: June 30, 2015
23
_______________________________________
THE HONORABLE C.W. HOFFMAN, JR.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
24
25
Firmwide:134354893.1 058279.1014
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
3960 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937
702.862.8800
2.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?