Ransey v. Willaims et al

Filing 15

ORDER that Petitioner's time to Respond to the 11 Motion to Dismiss is extended to 2/19/2016. If Petitioner files a Response, Respondents shall have 30 days to file a Reply. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 1/5/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
7

MARTICE RANSEY,

8
9

Petitioner,

2:15-cv-00919-RCJ-NJK

vs.
ORDER

10
11
12

ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al.,
Respondents.
_____________________________/

13
14

In this habeas corpus action, the respondents filed a motion to dismiss on October 19, 2015

15

(ECF No. 11). The petitioner, Martice Ransey, was to respond to the motion to dismiss by

16

December 21, 2015. See Order entered September 24, 2015 (ECF No. 9) (60 days for response).

17

Ransey did not file a response to the motion to dismiss by that date. The court will, sua sponte, grant

18

Ransey an extension of time, to February 12, 2015, for his response to the motion to dismiss.

19

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the time for petitioner to respond to respondents’

20

motion to dismiss (ECF No. 11) is extended to February 19, 2015. If petitioner does not respond to
2016.

21

the motion to dismiss by that date, the court will rule on the motion without the benefit of a response.

22

If petitioner files a response to the motion to dismiss, respondents shall than have 30 days to file a

23

reply in support of the motion.

24

Dated this _____ day of December, 2015.
Dated this 5th day of January, 2016.

25
26
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE