Smith v. Family Dollar, Inc.
Filing
15
ORDER re 13 Notice Pursuant to Local Rule 16-1(b). ORDERED that this matter qualifies for and should be referred to the ENE Referral Program. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/20/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Case 2:15-cv-00945-JCM-PAL Document 13 Filed 07/20/15 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
WENDY MEDURA KRINCEK, ESQ., Bar # 6417
CRYSTAL J. HERRERA, ESQ., Bar # 12396
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
3960 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937
Telephone:
702.862.8800
Fax No.:
702.862.8811
e-mail: wkrincek@littler.com
email: cherrera@littler.com
Attorneys for Defendant,
FAMILY DOLLAR, INC.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
DAVID SMITH,
Case No.: 2:15-cv-00945-JCM-PAL
Plaintiff,
vs.
FAMILY DOLLAR, INC., a North
Carolina Corporation; DOES I through X;
and ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through
X, inclusive,
NOTICE PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 166(b) AND/OR 16-5 AND REQUEST TO
SCHEDULE EARLY NEUTRAL
EVALUATION SESSION OR, IN THE
ALTERNATIVE, SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE
Defendant.
18
19
Plaintiff DAVID SMITH (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant FAMILY DOLLAR, INC.
20
(“Defendant”), by and though their respective counsel, hereby provide notice pursuant to Local Rule
21
16-6(b) that the parties to the above-captioned matter have not been referred to the early neutral
22
evaluation (“ENE”) and request this matter be referred to the ENE program pursuant to either LR
23
16-5 or 16-6. [Dkt. #1].
24
Pursuant to Local Rule 16-6, all employment discrimination actions filed in this Court are
25
referred to a neutral Magistrate Judge for the scheduling of an ENE session in order to provide the
26
parties with a candid evaluation of the merits of their claims and defenses. In this action, Plaintiff
27
asserts claims for interference and retaliation/discrimination under the Family Medical Leave Act,
28
29 U.S.C § 2601, et seq. (“FMLA”). [Dkt. #1]. Plaintiff also asserts a tort claim for retaliatory
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
3960 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937
702.862.8800
Case 2:15-cv-00945-JCM-PAL Document 13 Filed 07/20/15 Page 2 of 3
1
discharge in violation of public policy. Local Rule 16-6(b) does not expressly identify FMLA
2
violation claims or retaliatory discharge tort claims as comprising an “employment discrimination
3
action” subject to the ENE program. However, the parties believe the claims asserted are akin to
4
those causes of action that are subject to the ENE programs and that it would benefit the parties to
5
participate in the ENE program.
6
As provided in Local Rule 16-6(b), in the event an action is not initially assigned to the ENE
7
program, “an action must be assigned to the Program upon the filing by any party of a notice”
8
identifying the grounds for inclusion into the program. Alternatively, Local Rule 16-5 provides that
9
the Court may set a settlement conference at any time in a civil case at its discretion. As such, the
10
parties request this matter be referred for an ENE session.
11
12
13
Dated: July 20, 2015.
Dated: July 20, 2015.
Respectfully submitted,
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ James P. Kemp, Esq.
JAMES P. KEMP, ESQ.
KEMP & KEMP
/s/ Crystal J. Herrera, Esq.
WENDY MEDURA KRINCEK, ESQ.
CRYSTAL J. HERRERA, ESQ.
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
14
15
16
17
18
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
DAVID SMITH
Attorneys for Defendant,
FAMILY DOLLAR, INC.
19
20
21
22
IT IS ORDERED that this matter qualifies for and should be referred to the ENE
Referral Program.
DATED this 20th day of July, 2015.
23
__________________________
Peggy A. Leen
United States Magistrate Judge
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
3960 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937
702.862.8800
2.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?