Edmisten v. Neven et al
Filing
40
ORDER granting 39 Motion to Extend Time; Amended Petition due by 9/4/2018. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 8/29/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Rene L. Valladares
Federal Public Defender
Nevada State Bar No. 11479
*Megan C. Hoffman
Assistant Federal Public Defender
Nevada State Bar No. 9835
411 E. Bonneville Ave., Ste. 250
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
(702) 388-6577
Megan_Hoffman@fd.org
*Attorney for Petitioner Justin James Edmisten
9
10
U NITED S TATES D ISTRICT C OURT
D ISTRICT OF N EVADA
11
12
Justin James Edmisten,
13
Petitioner,
14
15
v.
Dwight Neven, et al.,
Respondents.
16
Case No. 2:15-cv-00952-RFB-NJK
Unopposed Motion for Extension
of Time to File a First Amended
Petition
(Third Request)
17
18
Petitioner Justin James Edmisten moves this Court for an Order extending
19
the time by eight (8) days, from August 27, 2018 to and including September 4, 2018
20
in which to file his counseled amended petition. This motion is based on the attached
21
points and authorities and the record in this case.
POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
22
23
24
25
26
1.
Petitioner mailed his pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus on May
15, 2015. ECF No. 4.
2.
On March 21, 2017, this Court reconsidered its previous order denying
counsel and appointed the Federal Public Defender, District of Nevada. ECF No. 17.
1
3.
On July 25, 2017, counsel filed a Motion to Partially Vacate the March
2
21, 2017, Order. ECF No. 26. Respondents opposed and Edmisten replied. ECF Nos.
3
28, 31. On March 29, 2018, this Court entered an Order granting Petitioner’s Motion
4
to Vacate the March 21, 2017 order and ordered counsel to file an Amended Petition
5
within sixty (60) days. ECF No. 33. This third request for an extension of time follows.
6
4.
Mr. Edmisten’s petition is drafted. However, counsel requires additional
7
time to speak with Mr. Edmisten about several of the claims in the drafted amended
8
petition. Counsel and Edmisten missed calls last week; counsel has scheduled
9
another call this week to speak with Mr. Edmisten. She therefore requests 8-days to
10
11
speak with her client before filing this petition.
5.
Counsel emailed counsel for Respondents, Jessica Perlick, who advised
12
she is not opposed to this request. Petitioner understands that opposing counsel’s
13
non-opposition does not waive any claims, defenses, statute of limitations, or other
14
substantive arguments the Respondents may choose to raise at a later date.
15
6.
This motion is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
16
Petitioner therefore respectfully requests that this Court grant his motion to file an
17
amended petition on or before September 4, 2018.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
1
Dated August 27, 2018.
2
Respectfully submitted,
3
Rene L. Valladares
Federal Public Defender
4
5
/s/Megan C. Hoffman
Megan C. Hoffman
Assistant Federal Public Defender
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED:
9
10
12
______________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, United
States District Judge
13
August 29, 2018.
Dated: ________________________
11
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
3
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I hereby certify that on August 27, 2018, I electronically filed the foregoing
3
with the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court, District of Nevada
4
by using the CM/ECF system.
5
6
Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by
the CM/ECF system and include: Jessica Perlick.
7
I further certify that some of the participants in the case are not registered
8
CM/ECF users. I have mailed the foregoing by First-Class Mail, postage pre-paid, or
9
have dispatched it to a third party commercial carrier for delivery within three
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
calendar days, to the following non-CM/ECF participants:
Justin Edmisten
Inmate ID 02682479
Clark County Detention Center
330 South Casino Center Boulevard
Las Vegas, NV 89101
/s/ Marcus Walker
An Employee of the
Federal Public Defender
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?