Edmisten v. Neven et al

Filing 40

ORDER granting 39 Motion to Extend Time; Amended Petition due by 9/4/2018. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 8/29/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Rene L. Valladares Federal Public Defender Nevada State Bar No. 11479 *Megan C. Hoffman Assistant Federal Public Defender Nevada State Bar No. 9835 411 E. Bonneville Ave., Ste. 250 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 388-6577 Megan_Hoffman@fd.org *Attorney for Petitioner Justin James Edmisten 9 10 U NITED S TATES D ISTRICT C OURT D ISTRICT OF N EVADA 11 12 Justin James Edmisten, 13 Petitioner, 14 15 v. Dwight Neven, et al., Respondents. 16 Case No. 2:15-cv-00952-RFB-NJK Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a First Amended Petition (Third Request) 17 18 Petitioner Justin James Edmisten moves this Court for an Order extending 19 the time by eight (8) days, from August 27, 2018 to and including September 4, 2018 20 in which to file his counseled amended petition. This motion is based on the attached 21 points and authorities and the record in this case. POINTS AND AUTHORITIES 22 23 24 25 26 1. Petitioner mailed his pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus on May 15, 2015. ECF No. 4. 2. On March 21, 2017, this Court reconsidered its previous order denying counsel and appointed the Federal Public Defender, District of Nevada. ECF No. 17. 1 3. On July 25, 2017, counsel filed a Motion to Partially Vacate the March 2 21, 2017, Order. ECF No. 26. Respondents opposed and Edmisten replied. ECF Nos. 3 28, 31. On March 29, 2018, this Court entered an Order granting Petitioner’s Motion 4 to Vacate the March 21, 2017 order and ordered counsel to file an Amended Petition 5 within sixty (60) days. ECF No. 33. This third request for an extension of time follows. 6 4. Mr. Edmisten’s petition is drafted. However, counsel requires additional 7 time to speak with Mr. Edmisten about several of the claims in the drafted amended 8 petition. Counsel and Edmisten missed calls last week; counsel has scheduled 9 another call this week to speak with Mr. Edmisten. She therefore requests 8-days to 10 11 speak with her client before filing this petition. 5. Counsel emailed counsel for Respondents, Jessica Perlick, who advised 12 she is not opposed to this request. Petitioner understands that opposing counsel’s 13 non-opposition does not waive any claims, defenses, statute of limitations, or other 14 substantive arguments the Respondents may choose to raise at a later date. 15 6. This motion is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. 16 Petitioner therefore respectfully requests that this Court grant his motion to file an 17 amended petition on or before September 4, 2018. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2 1 Dated August 27, 2018. 2 Respectfully submitted, 3 Rene L. Valladares Federal Public Defender 4 5 /s/Megan C. Hoffman Megan C. Hoffman Assistant Federal Public Defender 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED: 9 10 12 ______________________________ RICHARD F. BOULWARE, United States District Judge 13 August 29, 2018. Dated: ________________________ 11 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I hereby certify that on August 27, 2018, I electronically filed the foregoing 3 with the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court, District of Nevada 4 by using the CM/ECF system. 5 6 Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by the CM/ECF system and include: Jessica Perlick. 7 I further certify that some of the participants in the case are not registered 8 CM/ECF users. I have mailed the foregoing by First-Class Mail, postage pre-paid, or 9 have dispatched it to a third party commercial carrier for delivery within three 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 calendar days, to the following non-CM/ECF participants: Justin Edmisten Inmate ID 02682479 Clark County Detention Center 330 South Casino Center Boulevard Las Vegas, NV 89101 /s/ Marcus Walker An Employee of the Federal Public Defender 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?