Edmisten v. Neven et al

Filing 47

ORDER granting 45 Motion to Extend/Shorten Time. Respondents' answer due 1/4/2019. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 12/20/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
1 6 ADAM PAUL LAXALT Attorney General Jessica Perlick (Bar. No. 13218) Deputy Attorney General State of Nevada Office of the Attorney General 555 E. Washington Ave., #3900 Las Vegas, NV 89101 (702) 486-3825 (phone) (702) 486-2377 (fax) JPerlick@ag.nv.gov 7 Attorneys for Respondents 2 3 4 5 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 JUSTIN JAMES EDMISTEN, 11 Petitioner, 12 vs. 13 DWIGHT NEVEN, et al., 14 Case No. 2:15-cv-00952-RFB-NJK UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (ECF NO. 41) Respondents. (SECOND REQUEST) 15 16 17 Respondents move this Court for an enlargement of time of 17 days from the current due date of 18 December 18, 2018, up to and including January 4, 2019, in which to file their Response to the First 19 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 41). This Motion is made pursuant to Fed. R. 20 Civ. P. 6(b) and Rule 6-1 of the Local Rules of Practice and is based upon the attached declaration of 21 counsel. This is the second enlargement of time sought by Respondents to file this Response, and the 22 request is brought in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. 23 DATED: December 18, 2018. 24 Submitted by: 25 ADAM PAUL LAXALT Attorney General 26 27 28 By: /s/ Jessica Perlick Jessica Perlick (Bar. No. 13218) Deputy Attorney General Page 1 of 3 DECLARATION OF JESSICA PERLICK 1 2 3 STATE OF NEVADA ) ) ss: COUNTY OF CLARK ) 4 I, JESSICA PERLICK, being first duly sworn under oath, depose and state as follows: 5 1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in all courts within the State of Nevada, and am 6 employed as a Deputy Attorney General in the Office of the Nevada Attorney General. I am assigned to 7 represent Respondents in Justin James Edmisten v. Dwight Neven, et al., Case No. 2:15-cv-00952-RFB- 8 NJK, and as such, have personal knowledge of the matters contained herein. 9 2. This Motion is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. 10 3. The Response to the First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 41) is 11 12 currently due December 18, 2018. 4. I have been unable with due diligence to timely complete the response herein. A family 13 emergency has taken me out of the office and away from my files. As such, I have been unable to finish 14 the response, and request a short enlargement of time in which to do so. 15 16 17 18 5. I have spoken to Petitioner’s counsel, and she does not oppose this request for enlargement of time. 6. Based on the foregoing, I respectfully request an enlargement of time of 17 days, up to and including January 4, 2019, to file the Response to Edmisten’s First Amended Petition. 19 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 20 Executed on this Tuesday, December 18, 2018. 21 /s/ Jessica Perlick Jessica Perlick (Bar No. 13218) Deputy Attorney General 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED: 24 25 27 ________________________________ RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 DATED this 20th day of December, 2018. 26 Page 2 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of 3 Time to File Response to First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 41) (Second 4 Request) with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system on December 18, 2018. 5 6 7 8 9 10 The following participants in this case are registered CM/ECF users and will be served by the CM/ECF system: Megan C. Hoffman Federal Public Defender 411 E. Bonneville Avenue, Suite 250 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Megan_Hoffman@fd.org /s/ R. Carreau An employee of the Office of the Attorney General 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?