Edmisten v. Neven et al
Filing
47
ORDER granting 45 Motion to Extend/Shorten Time. Respondents' answer due 1/4/2019. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 12/20/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
6
ADAM PAUL LAXALT
Attorney General
Jessica Perlick (Bar. No. 13218)
Deputy Attorney General
State of Nevada
Office of the Attorney General
555 E. Washington Ave., #3900
Las Vegas, NV 89101
(702) 486-3825 (phone)
(702) 486-2377 (fax)
JPerlick@ag.nv.gov
7
Attorneys for Respondents
2
3
4
5
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
JUSTIN JAMES EDMISTEN,
11
Petitioner,
12
vs.
13
DWIGHT NEVEN, et al.,
14
Case No. 2:15-cv-00952-RFB-NJK
UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
TO FILE RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS
CORPUS (ECF NO. 41)
Respondents.
(SECOND REQUEST)
15
16
17
Respondents move this Court for an enlargement of time of 17 days from the current due date of
18
December 18, 2018, up to and including January 4, 2019, in which to file their Response to the First
19
Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 41). This Motion is made pursuant to Fed. R.
20
Civ. P. 6(b) and Rule 6-1 of the Local Rules of Practice and is based upon the attached declaration of
21
counsel. This is the second enlargement of time sought by Respondents to file this Response, and the
22
request is brought in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
23
DATED: December 18, 2018.
24
Submitted by:
25
ADAM PAUL LAXALT
Attorney General
26
27
28
By: /s/ Jessica Perlick
Jessica Perlick (Bar. No. 13218)
Deputy Attorney General
Page 1 of 3
DECLARATION OF JESSICA PERLICK
1
2
3
STATE OF NEVADA
)
) ss:
COUNTY OF CLARK )
4
I, JESSICA PERLICK, being first duly sworn under oath, depose and state as follows:
5
1.
I am an attorney licensed to practice law in all courts within the State of Nevada, and am
6
employed as a Deputy Attorney General in the Office of the Nevada Attorney General. I am assigned to
7
represent Respondents in Justin James Edmisten v. Dwight Neven, et al., Case No. 2:15-cv-00952-RFB-
8
NJK, and as such, have personal knowledge of the matters contained herein.
9
2.
This Motion is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
10
3.
The Response to the First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 41) is
11
12
currently due December 18, 2018.
4.
I have been unable with due diligence to timely complete the response herein. A family
13
emergency has taken me out of the office and away from my files. As such, I have been unable to finish
14
the response, and request a short enlargement of time in which to do so.
15
16
17
18
5.
I have spoken to Petitioner’s counsel, and she does not oppose this request for enlargement
of time.
6.
Based on the foregoing, I respectfully request an enlargement of time of 17 days, up to
and including January 4, 2019, to file the Response to Edmisten’s First Amended Petition.
19
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
20
Executed on this Tuesday, December 18, 2018.
21
/s/ Jessica Perlick
Jessica Perlick (Bar No. 13218)
Deputy Attorney General
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED:
24
25
27
________________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
28
DATED this 20th day of December, 2018.
26
Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of
3
Time to File Response to First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 41) (Second
4
Request) with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system on December 18, 2018.
5
6
7
8
9
10
The following participants in this case are registered CM/ECF users and will be served by the
CM/ECF system:
Megan C. Hoffman
Federal Public Defender
411 E. Bonneville Avenue, Suite 250
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Megan_Hoffman@fd.org
/s/ R. Carreau
An employee of the Office of the Attorney General
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?