Edmisten v. Neven et al
Filing
51
ORDER granting 50 Motion to Extend Time; Re: 48 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 3/4/2019. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 1/18/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Rene L. Valladares
Federal Public Defender
Nevada State Bar No. 11479
Megan C. Hoffman
Assistant Federal Public Defender
Nevada State Bar No. 9835
411 E. Bonneville, Ste. 250
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
(702) 388-6577
megan_hoffman@fd.org
Attorney for Petitioner Justin James Edmisten
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Justin James Edmisten.
Petitioner,
v.
Dwight Neven, et al.,
Respondents.
Case No. 2:15-cv-00952-RFB-NJK
Unopposed motion to extend time
to file opposition to motion to
dismiss
(First Request)
1
POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
2
Petitioner Justin James Edmisten respectfully asks this Court to enter an
3
Order extending his deadline for filing a counseled opposition to motion to dismiss by
4
45 days from January 18, 2019 until March 4, 2019.
5
6
7
8
Petitioner mailed his pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus on May 15,
2015. ECF No. 4.
On March 21, 2017, this Court reconsidered its previous order denying counsel
and appointed the Federal Public Defender, District of Nevada. ECF No. 17.
9
On January 4, 2019, Respondents filed a Motion to Dismiss First Amended
10
Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, ECF No. 48. This is a first request for an
11
extension of time.
12
Counsel’s schedule has prevented her from completing her response to the
13
motion to dismiss. Since the motion to dismiss was filed by Respondents, counsel has
14
had the following deadlines: Zanini v. Baker, 3:18-cv-00336 (protective first amended
15
petition); McNair v. Baca, 3:18-cv-00308-HDM-CBC (protective first amended
16
petition); Williams v. Gentry, 17-17422 (opening brief and excerpts of record).
17
Counsel was also out of the office on sick leave on January 17, 2019.
18
Counsel emailed counsel for Respondents, Jessica Perlick, who advised she is
19
not opposed to this request. Petitioner understands that opposing counsel’s non-
20
opposition does not waive any claims, defenses, statute of limitations, or other
21
substantive arguments the Respondents may choose to raise at a later date.
22
23
24
25
26
2
1
This motion is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. Petitioner
2
therefore respectfully requests that this Court grant his motion to file an opposition
3
to motion to dismiss on or before March 4, 2019.
4
5
Dated January 17, 2019.
6
Respectfully submitted,
7
Rene L. Valladares
Federal Public Defender
8
/s/Megan C. Hoffman
Megan C. Hoffman
Assistant Federal Public Defender
9
10
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED:
14
15
________________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
United States District Judge
16
17
DATED this 18th day of January, 2019.
Dated: ________________________
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
3
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I hereby certify that on January 17, 2019, I electronically filed the foregoing
3
with the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court, District of Nevada
4
by using the CM/ECF system.
5
6
Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by
the CM/ECF system and include: Jessica Perlick.
7
I further certify that some of the participants in the case are not registered
8
CM/ECF users. I have mailed the foregoing by First-Class Mail, postage pre-paid, or
9
have dispatched it to a third party commercial carrier for delivery within three
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
calendar days, to the following non-CM/ECF participants:
Justin Edmisten
No. 1047583
Lovelock Correctional Center
1200 Prison Road
Lovelock, NV 89419
/s/ Jessica Pillsbury
An Employee of the
Federal Public Defender
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?