Edmisten v. Neven et al

Filing 51

ORDER granting 50 Motion to Extend Time; Re: 48 Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 3/4/2019. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 1/18/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Rene L. Valladares Federal Public Defender Nevada State Bar No. 11479 Megan C. Hoffman Assistant Federal Public Defender Nevada State Bar No. 9835 411 E. Bonneville, Ste. 250 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 388-6577 megan_hoffman@fd.org Attorney for Petitioner Justin James Edmisten 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Justin James Edmisten. Petitioner, v. Dwight Neven, et al., Respondents. Case No. 2:15-cv-00952-RFB-NJK Unopposed motion to extend time to file opposition to motion to dismiss (First Request) 1 POINTS AND AUTHORITIES 2 Petitioner Justin James Edmisten respectfully asks this Court to enter an 3 Order extending his deadline for filing a counseled opposition to motion to dismiss by 4 45 days from January 18, 2019 until March 4, 2019. 5 6 7 8 Petitioner mailed his pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus on May 15, 2015. ECF No. 4. On March 21, 2017, this Court reconsidered its previous order denying counsel and appointed the Federal Public Defender, District of Nevada. ECF No. 17. 9 On January 4, 2019, Respondents filed a Motion to Dismiss First Amended 10 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, ECF No. 48. This is a first request for an 11 extension of time. 12 Counsel’s schedule has prevented her from completing her response to the 13 motion to dismiss. Since the motion to dismiss was filed by Respondents, counsel has 14 had the following deadlines: Zanini v. Baker, 3:18-cv-00336 (protective first amended 15 petition); McNair v. Baca, 3:18-cv-00308-HDM-CBC (protective first amended 16 petition); Williams v. Gentry, 17-17422 (opening brief and excerpts of record). 17 Counsel was also out of the office on sick leave on January 17, 2019. 18 Counsel emailed counsel for Respondents, Jessica Perlick, who advised she is 19 not opposed to this request. Petitioner understands that opposing counsel’s non- 20 opposition does not waive any claims, defenses, statute of limitations, or other 21 substantive arguments the Respondents may choose to raise at a later date. 22 23 24 25 26 2 1 This motion is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. Petitioner 2 therefore respectfully requests that this Court grant his motion to file an opposition 3 to motion to dismiss on or before March 4, 2019. 4 5 Dated January 17, 2019. 6 Respectfully submitted, 7 Rene L. Valladares Federal Public Defender 8 /s/Megan C. Hoffman Megan C. Hoffman Assistant Federal Public Defender 9 10 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED: 14 15 ________________________________ RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II ______________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Judge 16 17 DATED this 18th day of January, 2019. Dated: ________________________ 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 3 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I hereby certify that on January 17, 2019, I electronically filed the foregoing 3 with the Clerk of the Court for the United States District Court, District of Nevada 4 by using the CM/ECF system. 5 6 Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by the CM/ECF system and include: Jessica Perlick. 7 I further certify that some of the participants in the case are not registered 8 CM/ECF users. I have mailed the foregoing by First-Class Mail, postage pre-paid, or 9 have dispatched it to a third party commercial carrier for delivery within three 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 calendar days, to the following non-CM/ECF participants: Justin Edmisten No. 1047583 Lovelock Correctional Center 1200 Prison Road Lovelock, NV 89419 /s/ Jessica Pillsbury An Employee of the Federal Public Defender 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?