Harden v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
Filing
52
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. IT IS RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff Harold D. Harden's case be dismissed without prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 11/13/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 10/30/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
4
5
HAROLD D. HARDEN,
6
7
8
9
10
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF
)
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)
Case No. 2:15-cv-00970-GMN-CWH
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
11
12
After the court received three mailings to Plaintiff Harold D. Harden returned as
13
undeliverable, the court ordered Plaintiff to file a notice with his current address by October 27,
14
2017. (Order (ECF No. 49).) The court’s order was returned as undeliverable. (Mail Returned as
15
Undeliverable (ECF No. 50).) Plaintiff has not taken any action in the case since the court’s order.
16
Thus, it appears that Plaintiff no longer resides at the address on file with the court. Under Local
17
Rule IA 3-1,
18
19
20
An attorney or pro se party must immediately file with the court written notification
of any change of mailing address, email address, telephone number, or facsimile
number. The notification must include proof of service on each opposing party or
the party’s attorney. Failure to comply with this rule may result in the dismissal of
the action, entry of default judgment, or other sanctions as deemed appropriate by
the court.
21
22
In light of Plaintiff’s failure to update his address, the court will recommend dismissal of this case
23
without prejudice as a sanction for failure to comply with the court’s order.
24
25
26
IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff Harold D. Harden’s case be
dismissed without prejudice.
NOTICE
27
This report and recommendation is submitted to the United States district judge assigned to
28
this case under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party who objects to this report and recommendation may
1
file a written objection supported by points and authorities within fourteen days of being served
2
with this report and recommendation. Local Rule IB 3-2(a). Failure to file a timely objection may
3
waive the right to appeal the district court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir.
4
1991).
5
6
DATED: October 30, 2017
7
8
9
______________________________________
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?