Harden v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al

Filing 52

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. IT IS RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff Harold D. Harden's case be dismissed without prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 11/13/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 10/30/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 5 HAROLD D. HARDEN, 6 7 8 9 10 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF ) CORRECTIONS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) Case No. 2:15-cv-00970-GMN-CWH REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 11 12 After the court received three mailings to Plaintiff Harold D. Harden returned as 13 undeliverable, the court ordered Plaintiff to file a notice with his current address by October 27, 14 2017. (Order (ECF No. 49).) The court’s order was returned as undeliverable. (Mail Returned as 15 Undeliverable (ECF No. 50).) Plaintiff has not taken any action in the case since the court’s order. 16 Thus, it appears that Plaintiff no longer resides at the address on file with the court. Under Local 17 Rule IA 3-1, 18 19 20 An attorney or pro se party must immediately file with the court written notification of any change of mailing address, email address, telephone number, or facsimile number. The notification must include proof of service on each opposing party or the party’s attorney. Failure to comply with this rule may result in the dismissal of the action, entry of default judgment, or other sanctions as deemed appropriate by the court. 21 22 In light of Plaintiff’s failure to update his address, the court will recommend dismissal of this case 23 without prejudice as a sanction for failure to comply with the court’s order. 24 25 26 IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff Harold D. Harden’s case be dismissed without prejudice. NOTICE 27 This report and recommendation is submitted to the United States district judge assigned to 28 this case under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party who objects to this report and recommendation may 1 file a written objection supported by points and authorities within fourteen days of being served 2 with this report and recommendation. Local Rule IB 3-2(a). Failure to file a timely objection may 3 waive the right to appeal the district court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 4 1991). 5 6 DATED: October 30, 2017 7 8 9 ______________________________________ C.W. Hoffman, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?