Dornin v. Lombardo et al
Filing
8
ORDER dismissing case without prejudice.. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 1/10/2018., Case terminated. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
DONALD C. DORNIN,
Petitioner,
10
11
12
13
vs.
Case No. 2:15-cv-01007-RFB-NJK
ORDER
JOE LOMBARDO, et al.,
Respondents.
14
15
Petitioner has filed a habeas petition challenging his pending criminal case and anticipated
16
sentencing in a state criminal case. While a federal court may hear a petition for an individual in
17
custody who has not yet been sentenced or convicted, principles of comity generally require the
18
federal court to abstain, absent extraordinary circumstances, from any intervention into the state
19
court proceeding until it has been completed. Carden v. Montana, 626 F.2d 82, 83-84 (9th Cir.),
20
cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1014, 101 S. Ct. 573, 66 L. Ed. 2d 473 (1980).
21
The Court does not find that there are extraordinary circumstances in this case warranting
22
intervention in the state court criminal proceeding. Id. Petitioner did file a response to the Order
23
to Show Cause filed by this Court, but his response did not establish a basis for this Court to
24
intervene in his state case. Id. The petitioner in this case may seek whatever federal habeas relief
25
that is legally appropriate upon the completion of his state criminal case, including his pursuit of
26
direct appeals and state habeas proceedings.
27
28
1
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice to petitioner
2
seeking federal habeas relief upon the completion of his state court criminal proceedings and
3
appeals and state habeas challenges.
4
DATED: January 10, 2018.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
_________________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?