Kaplan v. Eldorado Resorts Corporation et al

Filing 62

ORDER Granting 61 Stipulation to Extend Time re: Discovery Deadlines (Second Request). See Order for deadlines. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 4/13/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Download PDF
Case 2:15-cv-01015-RFB-PAL Document 61 Filed 04/10/17 Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 Wells Fargo Tower Suite 1500, 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: 702.369.6800 Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. 9 ANTHONY L. MARTIN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8177 anthony.martin@ogletreedeakins.com JILL GARCIA, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7805 jill.garcia@ogletreedeakins.com MARCUS B. SMITH, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12098 marcus.smith@ogletreedeakins.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. Wells Fargo Tower Suite 1500 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: 702.369.6800 Fax: 702.369.6888 Attorneys for Defendants Eldorado Resorts Corporation and Michael Marrs 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 14 15 LYNN KAPLAN, Case No.: 2:15-cv-01015-RFB-PAL Plaintiff, 16 17 vs. 18 ELDORADO RESORTS CORPORATION, a Florida corporation; MICHAEL MARRS; BRUCE POLANSKY; KRISTEN BECK; DOMINIC TALEGHANI; JAMES GRIMES; AND DOES 1-50, inclusive; 19 20 21 22 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS AND RESPONSES AND REPLIES THERETO (SECOND REQUEST) Defendants. Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, LR IA 6-2, LR 7-1 and LR 26-4, Plaintiff Lynn Kaplan (“Plaintiff”) 23 24 and Defendants Eldorado Resorts Corporation and Michael Marrs (collectively “Defendants”), by 25 and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to this second request for 26 extension of time for the parties to file a response and reply to the previously filed Dispositive 27 Motion (ECF No. 57). Pursuant to the Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to File Dispositive 28 Case 2:15-cv-01015-RFB-PAL Document 61 Filed 04/10/17 Page 2 of 5 1 Motions, and Responses thereto (First Request) (ECF No. 53), Defendants filed the Dispositive 2 Motion in this case on February 27, 2017 (ECF No. 57). The parties have completed all discovery 3 in this matter, and good cause exists for the proposed extension based upon the following: 4 5 6 As the Court is aware, this case is one of over thirty related lawsuits sitting before this Court. Recognizing the complexity of litigating these lawsuits simultaneously, the parties agreed to divide the cases into five groups and stagger deadlines in order to streamline the litigation 7 8 10 11 Wells Fargo Tower Suite 1500, 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: 702.369.6800 Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. 9 12 13 process and avoid overlapping dispositive motion deadlines. On December 28, 2016, the parties agreed to a comprehensive briefing schedule for dispositive motions in the remaining groups of cases. (ECF No. 53.) The current status of the comprehensive briefing schedule is as follows: Group III(A)  Defendants shall file dispositive motions by February 27, 2017.  Plaintiffs shall file oppositions by March 29, 2017.  Defendants shall file replies by April 28, 2017. 14 15 16 Group III(B) 17  Defendants shall file dispositive motions by March 23, 2017. 18  Plaintiffs shall file oppositions by April 24, 2017.  Defendants shall file replies by May 24, 2017. 19 20 21 Group IV(A) 22  Defendants shall file dispositive motions by April 13, 2017. 23  Plaintiffs shall file oppositions by May 12, 2017. 24  Defendants shall file replies by June 13, 2017. 25 26 27 28 Group IV(B)  Defendants shall file dispositive motions by June 6, 2017.  Plaintiffs shall file oppositions by July 6, 2017. 2 Case 2:15-cv-01015-RFB-PAL Document 61 Filed 04/10/17 Page 3 of 5  1 Defendants shall file replies by August 7, 2017. 2 Group V 3  Defendants shall file dispositive motions by June 22, 2017. 4  Plaintiffs shall file oppositions by July 24, 2017.  Defendants shall file replies by August 23, 2017. 5 6 In compliance with that stipulation, Defendants filed Motions for Summary Judgment on 7 (ECF No. 60); Kaplan v. Eldorado Resorts Corp., Case No.: 2:15-cv-01015-RFB-PAL (ECF No. 10 57); D. Parr v. Eldorado Resorts Corp., Case No.: 2:15-cv-01028-RFB-PAL (ECF No. 50); and 11 Wells Fargo Tower Suite 1500, 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: 702.369.6800 February 27, 2017, in Barnes v. Eldorado Resorts Corp., Case No.: 2:15-cv-01026-RFB-PAL 9 Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. 8 Scheinberg v. Eldorado Resorts Corp., Case No.: 12 2:15-cv-01031-RFB-PAL (ECF No. 63). Unilaterally and without notice to defense counsel, on the day before oppositions were due, 13 14 15 Plaintiffs filed a request for an extension to file oppositions to the Motions for Summary Judgment on March 28, 2017, in the foregoing cases: Barnes v. Eldorado Resorts Corp., Case No.: 2:15-cv- 16 01026-RFB-PAL (ECF No. 63); Kaplan v. Eldorado Resorts Corp., Case No.: 2:15-cv-01015- 17 RFB-PAL (ECF No. 60); D. Parr v. Eldorado Resorts Corp., Case No.: 2:15-cv-01028-RFB-PAL 18 (ECF No. 53); and Scheinberg v. Eldorado Resorts Corp., Case No.: 2:15-cv-01031-RFB-PAL 19 (ECF No. 66), seeking to extend the current filing date of March 29, 2017, to April 12, 2017. This 20 request remains pending before the Court. Due to this delay, the entire comprehensive briefing 21 22 schedule has been impacted, causing overlapping and unreasonable deadlines. The delays will 23 make it difficult to comply with the current briefing schedules for the remaining matters. 24 ... 25 ... 26 ... 27 ... 28 3 Case 2:15-cv-01015-RFB-PAL Document 61 Filed 04/10/17 Page 4 of 5 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to adjust the briefing schedule in the manner 1 2 presented below in an effort to allow the parties to comply with the briefing schedule in a 3 reasonable manner as follows: 4 Group III(A) 5   6 Plaintiffs shall file oppositions by April 12, 2017. Defendants shall file replies by May 12, 2017. 7 Group III(B) 8  Plaintiffs shall file oppositions by May 8, 2017. 10  Defendants shall file replies by June 7, 2017. 11 Wells Fargo Tower Suite 1500, 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: 702.369.6800 Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. 9 Group IV(A) 12  Defendants shall file dispositive motions by May 31, 2017.  Plaintiffs shall file oppositions by June 30, 2017.  Defendants shall file replies by July 31, 2017. 13 14 15 Group IV(B) 16 17  Defendants shall file dispositive motions by June 21, 2017. 18  Plaintiffs shall file oppositions by July 21, 2017.  Defendants shall file replies by August 21, 2017. 19 20 Group V 21 22  Defendants shall file dispositive motions by August 30, 2017. 23  Plaintiffs shall file oppositions by September 29, 2017. 24  Defendants shall file replies by October 30, 2017. 25 As relevant to this matter, the parties have agreed that the dispositive motion deadlines 26 27 28 should be extended as follows: ... 4 Case 2:15-cv-01015-RFB-PAL Document 61 Filed 04/10/17 Page 5 of 5 1  April 12, 2017; 2 3 4 5 Plaintiff shall file any response to Defendants’ dispositive motion no later than  Defendants shall file their reply no later than May 12, 2017. This stipulation is not brought for purposes of delay or any other improper purpose. Dated this 10th day of April, 2017. 6 WATKINS & LETOFSKY, LLP OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. /s/ Daniel R. Watkins Daniel R. Watkins Brian S. Letofsky 8215 South Eastern Avenue Suite 265 Las Vegas, NV 89123 Telephone: 702-487-7574 Attorneys for Plaintiff Lynn Kaplan /s/ Jill Garcia Anthony L. Martin Jill Garcia Marcus B. Smith 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 1500 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: 702-369-6800 Attorneys for Defendants Eldorado Resorts Corporation, and Michael Marrs 7 8 10 11 Wells Fargo Tower Suite 1500, 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: 702.369.6800 Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. 9 12 13 14 15 16 ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE April 13, 2017 19 20 DATED . 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?