Mittal v. County of Clark
ORDER granting 53 Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint. Katowich Terminated from Case. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 3/30/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Case No. 2:15-CV-1037-KJD-VCF
COUNTY OF CLARK, et al.,
Presently before the Court is Defendant Todd Katowich’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s
Amended Complaint (#53). Though the time for doing so has passed, no response in opposition has
been filed. Therefore, in accordance with Local Rule 7-2(d), the Court construes lack of opposition
as Plaintiff’s consent to the granting of the motion. Additionally, the Court has reviewed the
substantive merits of the motion. The Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to assert factual allegations
against Katowich that state a claim under any of the fifteen causes of action he identifies in his
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Katowich’s Motion to Dismiss
Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (#53) is GRANTED;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter JUDGMENT for Defendant
Todd Katowich and against Plaintiff.
DATED this ______ day of March 2017.
Kent J. Dawson
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?