Mittal v. County of Clark

Filing 119

ORDER granting 53 Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint. Katowich Terminated from Case. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 3/30/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 RAJA MITTAL, 7 Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 Case No. 2:15-CV-1037-KJD-VCF COUNTY OF CLARK, et al., 10 ORDER Defendants. 11 12 Presently before the Court is Defendant Todd Katowich’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s 13 Amended Complaint (#53). Though the time for doing so has passed, no response in opposition has 14 been filed. Therefore, in accordance with Local Rule 7-2(d), the Court construes lack of opposition 15 as Plaintiff’s consent to the granting of the motion. Additionally, the Court has reviewed the 16 substantive merits of the motion. The Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to assert factual allegations 17 against Katowich that state a claim under any of the fifteen causes of action he identifies in his 18 complaint. 19 20 21 22 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Katowich’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (#53) is GRANTED; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter JUDGMENT for Defendant Todd Katowich and against Plaintiff. 30 DATED this ______ day of March 2017. 24 25 26 _____________________________ Kent J. Dawson United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?