Mittal v. County of Clark

Filing 119

ORDER granting 53 Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint. Katowich Terminated from Case. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 3/30/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

5
6

RAJA MITTAL,

7

Plaintiff,

8

v.

9

Case No. 2:15-CV-1037-KJD-VCF

COUNTY OF CLARK, et al.,

10

ORDER

Defendants.

11
12

Presently before the Court is Defendant Todd Katowich’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s

13

Amended Complaint (#53). Though the time for doing so has passed, no response in opposition has

14

been filed. Therefore, in accordance with Local Rule 7-2(d), the Court construes lack of opposition

15

as Plaintiff’s consent to the granting of the motion. Additionally, the Court has reviewed the

16

substantive merits of the motion. The Court finds that Plaintiff has failed to assert factual allegations

17

against Katowich that state a claim under any of the fifteen causes of action he identifies in his

18

complaint.

19
20
21
22
23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Katowich’s Motion to Dismiss
Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint (#53) is GRANTED;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court enter JUDGMENT for Defendant
Todd Katowich and against Plaintiff.
30
DATED this ______ day of March 2017.

24
25
26

_____________________________
Kent J. Dawson
United States District Judge