Mittal v. County of Clark
Filing
135
ORDER denying 127 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 5/4/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
10
RAJA MITTAL,
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
Case No. 2:15-CV-1037-KJD-VCF
ROBERT DRASKOVICH, ESQ., et al.,
14
ORDER
Defendants.
15
16
17
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider the Claims for Relief against
Defendant Draskovich (#127).
18
The Court entered and Order (#117) dismissing all federal claims against Defendant
19
Draskovich, primarily because Draskovich is not a state actor under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court
20
then declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims, including the
21
legal malpractice claim. Those claims, against Draskovich, were not dismissed with prejudice.
22
Plaintiff is free to bring them in state court where they belong. Plaintiff has made no showing that the
23
Court should retain them in the federal action where all claims and defendants have been dismissed
24
and the case is closed.
25
///
26
///
1
2
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Reconsider the Claims
for Relief against Defendant Draskovich (#127) is DENIED.
DATED this 4th day of May 2017.
4
5
6
7
_____________________________
Kent J. Dawson
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?