Le et al v. Zuffa, LLC

Filing 495

ORDER Granting #349 Motion to Seal re #347 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 9/26/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

WILLIAM A. ISAACSON (Pro Hac Vice)
([e-mail])
STACEY K. GRIGSBY (Pro Hac Vice)
([e-mail])
NICHOLAS A. WIDNELL (Pro Hac Vice)
([e-mail])
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
1401 New York Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: [phone]; Fax: [phone]
RICHARD J. POCKER #3568
([e-mail])
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
300 South Fourth Street, Suite 800, Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone: [phone]; Fax: [phone]
DONALD J. CAMPBELL #1216
([e-mail])
J. COLBY WILLIAMS #5549
([e-mail])
CAMPBELL & WILLIAMS
700 South 7th Street, Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone: [phone]; Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant Zuffa, LLC, d/b/a
Ultimate Fighting Championship and UFC

16
17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

19
20
21

Cung Le, Nathan Quarry, Jon Fitch, Brandon
Vera, Luis Javier Vazquez, and Kyle
Kingsbury on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated,

22
23
24
25
26
27

Plaintiffs,
v.
Zuffa, LLC, d/b/a Ultimate Fighting
Championship and UFC,
Defendant.

Case No.: 2:15-cv-01045-RFB-(PAL)

___________
[PROPOSED] ORDER
GRANTING ZUFFA, LLC’S
MOTION TO SEAL PORTIONS
OF MOTION FOR PARTIAL
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO
PLAINTIFF NATHAN QUARRY
ON STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS
GROUNDS AND SUPPORTING
MEMORANDUM OF LAW AND
RELATED EXHIBITS

28

[Proposed] Order Granting Zuffa, LLC’s Motion to Seal

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2

Before this Court is Defendant Zuffa, LLC’s Motion to Seal Portions of Motion for Partial

3

Summary Judgment As to Plaintiff Nathan Quarry on Statute of Limitations Grounds And

4

Supporting Memorandum of Law and Related Exhibits (“Zuffa’s Motion to Seal”). Federal Rule

5

of Civil Procedure 26(c) provides that a trial court may seal court documents in connection with a

6

dispositive motion if “compelling reasons” exist to seal those documents. Kamakana v. City &

7

Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1179 (9th Cir. 2006) (citation omitted). Having considered

8

Zuffa’s Motion to Seal, the Court has found that “compelling reasons” exist to seal the

9

documents, or portions thereof, referenced in Zuffa’s Motion to Seal.

10
11
12

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Zuffa, LLC’s Motion to Seal is GRANTED. The
Clerk of the Court shall file under seal:
1. Exhibits A, B, C, D, E F, H, I and J to Zuffa’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment As

13

to Plaintiff Nathan Quarry on Statute of Limitations Grounds And Supporting

14

Memorandum of Law (“Zuffa’s Motion”).

15

2. The designated portions of Zuffa, LLC’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment As to

16

Plaintiff Nathan Quarry on Statute of Limitations Grounds and Supporting Memorandum

17

of Law,

18
19
20
21

3. The designated portions of Exhibit K, the Declaration of Kirk D. Hendrick in Support of
Zuffa’s Motion
4. The designated portions of the Statement of Undisputed Facts in Support of Zuffa’s
Motion.

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26

September 26, 2017
DATED: _____________________

By: _______________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
United States District Judge

27
28
1
[Proposed] Order Granting Zuffa, LLC’s Motion to Seal