Ruediger et al v. Zuffa, LLC
Filing
48
ORDER to Consolidate. It is ORDERED that 2:15-cv-1046-RCJ-NJK; 2:15-cv-01055-APG-GWF; 2:15-cv-01056-RFB-GWF; 2:15-cv-01057-JCM-CWH is/are consolidated under 2:15-cv-01045-RFB-PAL. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is REASSIGNED to District Judge Richard F. Boulware, II, and Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 6/11/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
8
Cung Le, Nathan Quarry, and Jon Fitch, on
behalf of themselves and all others similarly
situated,
9
10
11
Plaintiffs,
v.
ZUFFA, LLC, d/b/a Ultimate Fighting
Championship and UFC,
12
Lead Case No.: 2:15-cv-01045-RFB-PAL
Member Case Nos.:
2:15-cv-01046-RCJ-NJK
2:15-cv-01055-APG-GWF
2:15-cv-01056-RFB-GWF
2:15-cv-01057-JCM-CWH
CONSOLIDATION ORDER
Defendant.
13
14
15
Kyle Kingsbury and Darren Uyenoyama, on
behalf of themselves and all others similarly
situated,
16
17
18
19
Plaintiffs,
v.
ZUFFA, LLC, d/b/a Ultimate Fighting
Championship and UFC,
Defendant.
20
21
22
Luis Javier Vazquez and Dennis Lloyd
Hallman, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated,
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.: 2:15-cv-1046-RCJ-NJK
Plaintiffs,
v.
ZUFFA, LLC, d/b/a Ultimate Fighting
Championship and UFC,
Defendant.
Case No.: 2:15-cv-01055-APG-GWF
1
Brandon Vera and Pablo Garza, on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated,
2
3
4
5
Plaintiffs,
v.
ZUFFA, LLC, d/b/a Ultimate Fighting
Championship and UFC,
Defendants.
6
7
8
11
Case No.: 2:15-cv-01057-JCM-CWH
Gabe Ruediger and Mac Danzig, on behalf of
themselves and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
9
10
Case No.: 2:15-cv-01056-RFB-GWF
v.
Zuffa, LLC, d/b/a Ultimate Fighting
Championship and UFC,
12
Defendants.
13
14
On June 4, 2015, the five above-captioned cases were transferred into this District pursuant
15
to an order transferring them from the Northern District of California. Plaintiffs and Defendant
16
filed a Notice of Related Cases in all five cases. There are also pending Motions to Consolidate in
17
case no. 2:15-cv-01045-RFB-PAL (ECF No. 52), case no. 2:15-cv-01055-APG-GWF (ECF No.
18
29), and case no. 2:15-cv-01056-RFB-GWF (ECF No. 29), as well as a pending Motion to Relate
19
Case in case no. 2:15-cv-01055-APG-GWF (ECF No. 26).
20
The presiding District Judges in these actions have determined that these actions are related
21
and that there is good cause to consolidate them under the same District Judge and Magistrate
22
Judge. Neither party opposes consolidation. Further, consolidation will promote judicial
23
efficiency, avoid duplicative filings by the parties, and will not result in prejudice to the parties.
24
ORDER
25
Therefore,
26
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that case no. 2:15-cv-01045-RFB-PAL, no. 2:15-cv-01046-
27
RCJ-NJK, no. 2:15-cv-01055-APG-GWF, no. 2:15-cv-01056-RFB-GWF, and no. 2:15-cv-01057-
28
JCM-CWH are CONSOLIDATED, with case no. 2:15-cv-01045-RFB-PAL to serve as the lead
-2-
1
case and the other cases serving as member cases. All further documents shall be filed in the lead
2
case 2:15-cv-01045-RFB-PAL and shall bear that case number.
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that case no. 2:15-cv-01046-RCJ-NJK, no. 2:15-cv-01055-
4
APG-GWF,
no.
2:15-cv-01056-RFB-GWF,
and
no.
2:15-cv-01057-JCM-CWH
are
5
REASSIGNED to District Judge Richard F. Boulware, II, and Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen
6
for all further proceedings.
7
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motions to Consolidate in case no. 2:15-cv-01045-
8
RFB-PAL (ECF No. 52), case no. 2:15-cv-01055-APG-GWF (ECF No. 29), and case no. 2:15-cv-
9
01056-RFB-GWF (ECF No. 29) are GRANTED.
10
11
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Relate Case in case no. 2:15-cv-01055APG-GWF (ECF No. 26) is GRANTED.
12
13
DATED: June 11, 2015.
______________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?