Ruediger et al v. Zuffa, LLC

Filing 48

ORDER to Consolidate. It is ORDERED that 2:15-cv-1046-RCJ-NJK; 2:15-cv-01055-APG-GWF; 2:15-cv-01056-RFB-GWF; 2:15-cv-01057-JCM-CWH is/are consolidated under 2:15-cv-01045-RFB-PAL. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is REASSIGNED to District Judge Richard F. Boulware, II, and Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 6/11/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 8 Cung Le, Nathan Quarry, and Jon Fitch, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 9 10 11 Plaintiffs, v. ZUFFA, LLC, d/b/a Ultimate Fighting Championship and UFC, 12 Lead Case No.: 2:15-cv-01045-RFB-PAL Member Case Nos.: 2:15-cv-01046-RCJ-NJK 2:15-cv-01055-APG-GWF 2:15-cv-01056-RFB-GWF 2:15-cv-01057-JCM-CWH CONSOLIDATION ORDER Defendant. 13 14 15 Kyle Kingsbury and Darren Uyenoyama, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 16 17 18 19 Plaintiffs, v. ZUFFA, LLC, d/b/a Ultimate Fighting Championship and UFC, Defendant. 20 21 22 Luis Javier Vazquez and Dennis Lloyd Hallman, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No.: 2:15-cv-1046-RCJ-NJK Plaintiffs, v. ZUFFA, LLC, d/b/a Ultimate Fighting Championship and UFC, Defendant. Case No.: 2:15-cv-01055-APG-GWF 1 Brandon Vera and Pablo Garza, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 2 3 4 5 Plaintiffs, v. ZUFFA, LLC, d/b/a Ultimate Fighting Championship and UFC, Defendants. 6 7 8 11 Case No.: 2:15-cv-01057-JCM-CWH Gabe Ruediger and Mac Danzig, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 9 10 Case No.: 2:15-cv-01056-RFB-GWF v. Zuffa, LLC, d/b/a Ultimate Fighting Championship and UFC, 12 Defendants. 13 14 On June 4, 2015, the five above-captioned cases were transferred into this District pursuant 15 to an order transferring them from the Northern District of California. Plaintiffs and Defendant 16 filed a Notice of Related Cases in all five cases. There are also pending Motions to Consolidate in 17 case no. 2:15-cv-01045-RFB-PAL (ECF No. 52), case no. 2:15-cv-01055-APG-GWF (ECF No. 18 29), and case no. 2:15-cv-01056-RFB-GWF (ECF No. 29), as well as a pending Motion to Relate 19 Case in case no. 2:15-cv-01055-APG-GWF (ECF No. 26). 20 The presiding District Judges in these actions have determined that these actions are related 21 and that there is good cause to consolidate them under the same District Judge and Magistrate 22 Judge. Neither party opposes consolidation. Further, consolidation will promote judicial 23 efficiency, avoid duplicative filings by the parties, and will not result in prejudice to the parties. 24 ORDER 25 Therefore, 26 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that case no. 2:15-cv-01045-RFB-PAL, no. 2:15-cv-01046- 27 RCJ-NJK, no. 2:15-cv-01055-APG-GWF, no. 2:15-cv-01056-RFB-GWF, and no. 2:15-cv-01057- 28 JCM-CWH are CONSOLIDATED, with case no. 2:15-cv-01045-RFB-PAL to serve as the lead -2- 1 case and the other cases serving as member cases. All further documents shall be filed in the lead 2 case 2:15-cv-01045-RFB-PAL and shall bear that case number. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that case no. 2:15-cv-01046-RCJ-NJK, no. 2:15-cv-01055- 4 APG-GWF, no. 2:15-cv-01056-RFB-GWF, and no. 2:15-cv-01057-JCM-CWH are 5 REASSIGNED to District Judge Richard F. Boulware, II, and Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen 6 for all further proceedings. 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motions to Consolidate in case no. 2:15-cv-01045- 8 RFB-PAL (ECF No. 52), case no. 2:15-cv-01055-APG-GWF (ECF No. 29), and case no. 2:15-cv- 9 01056-RFB-GWF (ECF No. 29) are GRANTED. 10 11 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Relate Case in case no. 2:15-cv-01055APG-GWF (ECF No. 26) is GRANTED. 12 13 DATED: June 11, 2015. ______________________________ RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?