Bank of America, N.A. v. Alturas at Mountain's Edge Homeowners Association et al
Filing
17
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 16 Emergency Motion for Protective Order. The parties are ORDERED to further confer following service of the identified discovery. If the parties are unable to resolve among themselves the dispute concerning the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition, then Plaintiff may renew its motion for protective order no later than 12/17/2015. Any Response shall be due by 12/21/2015. Any Reply shall be due by 12/23/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 12/10/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
11
Plaintiff(s),
12
vs.
13
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL I, LLC, et al.,
14
Defendant(s).
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:15-cv-01097-GMN-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 16)
16
Pending before the Court is a motion for protective order regarding a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition
17
scheduled for January 8, 2016. Docket No. 16. The papers indicate that the parties’ positions regarding
18
the disputed issues may be altered once certain discovery is served on December 14, 2015. See, e.g.,
19
Docket No. 16-1 at ¶ 5. As such, the pending motion is DENIED without prejudice. The parties are
20
ORDERED to further confer following service of the identified discovery. If the parties are unable to
21
resolve among themselves the dispute concerning the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition, then Plaintiff may renew
22
its motion for protective order no later than December 17, 2015. Any response shall be filed no later
23
than December 21, 2015, and any reply shall be filed no later than December 23, 2015.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Dated: December 10, 2015
26
27
28
NANCY J. KOPPE
CY
PE
E
United States Magistrate Judge
Magistrate
Ma trat
tr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?