Bank of America, N.A. v. Alturas at Mountain's Edge Homeowners Association et al

Filing 17

ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 16 Emergency Motion for Protective Order. The parties are ORDERED to further confer following service of the identified discovery. If the parties are unable to resolve among themselves the dispute concerning the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition, then Plaintiff may renew its motion for protective order no later than 12/17/2015. Any Response shall be due by 12/21/2015. Any Reply shall be due by 12/23/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 12/10/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., 11 Plaintiff(s), 12 vs. 13 SFR INVESTMENTS POOL I, LLC, et al., 14 Defendant(s). 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:15-cv-01097-GMN-NJK ORDER (Docket No. 16) 16 Pending before the Court is a motion for protective order regarding a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition 17 scheduled for January 8, 2016. Docket No. 16. The papers indicate that the parties’ positions regarding 18 the disputed issues may be altered once certain discovery is served on December 14, 2015. See, e.g., 19 Docket No. 16-1 at ¶ 5. As such, the pending motion is DENIED without prejudice. The parties are 20 ORDERED to further confer following service of the identified discovery. If the parties are unable to 21 resolve among themselves the dispute concerning the Rule 30(b)(6) deposition, then Plaintiff may renew 22 its motion for protective order no later than December 17, 2015. Any response shall be filed no later 23 than December 21, 2015, and any reply shall be filed no later than December 23, 2015. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: December 10, 2015 26 27 28 NANCY J. KOPPE CY PE E United States Magistrate Judge Magistrate Ma trat tr

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?