Mark Elliott v. Oakridge Industries, Inc., et al

Filing 88

ORDER Granting 87 Stipulation to Extend Time re 78 , 79 , 80 MOTIONS to Compel. (Responses due by 8/23/2017.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 8/8/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 JOSEPH A. GUTIERREZ, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9046 STEVEN G. KNAUSS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12242 MAIER GUTIERREZ & ASSOCIATES 8816 Spanish Ridge Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89148 Telephone: (702) 629-7900 Facsimile: (702) 629-7925 Email: jag@mgalaw.com sgk@mgalaw.com AMBER C. ROBINSON, ESQ. Florida Bar No. 107215 (pro hac vice) ROBINSON LAW OFFICE PLLC 695 Central Avenue, Suite 264 St. Petersburg, Florida 33712 Telephone: (813) 613-2400 Facsimile: (727) 362-1979 Email: arobinson@arobinsonlawfirm.com 11 12 13 14 RAFAL STRZALKOWSKI, ESQ. Florida Bar No. 89248 (pro hac vice) FLORIDA DISABILITY ACCESS AND AWARENESS FOUNDATION 2124 NW 142 ND Avenue Gainesville, Florida 32609 Telephone: (352) 262-9593 Email: rstrzalkowski@fdaaf.org 15 Attorneys for Plaintiff Mark Elliott 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 17 18 19 MARK ELLIOTT, 20 21 22 23 24 Case No. 2:15-cv-01143-APG-VCF Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPONSE THE PRESCOTT COMPANIES, LLC dba TO DEFENDANT OAKRIDGE PRESCOTT MANAGEMENT; OAKRIDGE INDUSTRIES, INC.’S MOTIONS TO INDUSTRIES, INC., DOES I-X and ROE COMPEL [ECF Nos. 78, 79, & 80] CORPORATIONS I-X, inclusive, (FIRST REQUEST) Defendants. vs. 25 26 Plaintiff Mark Elliott, and Defendant Oakridge Industries, Inc., stipulate and agree, through 27 their respective counsels of record, that Plaintiff shall have an extension up to and including August 28 9, 2017, to file his response to Oakridge Industries, Inc.’s Motions to Compel [Docket/ECH Numbers 1 1 78, 79, and 80]. The parties enter into this stipulation to allow additional time to Plaintiff and 2 Plaintiff’s counsel to prepare a response. 3 Defendant Oakridge Industries, Inc. will file its reply by August, 23, 2017. 4 This is the Plaintiff’s first request for an extension of this deadline and it is submitted in good 5 6 7 faith without purpose of prejudice or undue delay. DATED this 7th day of August, 2017. MAIER GUTIERREZ & ASSOCIATES WOOD, SMITH, HENNING & BERMAN LLC __/s/ Steven G. Knauss______________ JOSEPH A. GUTIERREZ, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9046 STEVEN G. KNAUSS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12242 8816 Spanish Ridge Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89148 Local Counsel for Plaintiff Mark Elliott ___/s/ Brooke A. Bohlke_______________ BROOKE A. BOHLKE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9374 7674 West Lake Mead Blvd., Suite 150 Las Vegas, NV 89128 Attorney for Defendant Oakridge Industries, Inc. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ORDER 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 8-8-2017 DATED:___________________ 18 19 20 ____________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 5(b) and Electronic Filing Procedure IV(B), I certify that on the 7th day 3 of August, 2017, a true and correct copy of the STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION 4 OF TIME TO RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT OAKRIDGE INDUSTRIES, INC.’S MOTIONS 5 TO COMPEL [DKT. NOS. 78, 79, & 80], was transmitted electronically through the Court’s e- 6 filing electronic notice system to the attorney(s) associated with this case: 7 8 9 10 WOOD, SMITH, HENNING & BERMAN LLC BROOKE A. BOHLKE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9374 7674 West Lake Mead Blvd., Suite 150 Las Vegas, NV 89128 Attorney for Defendant Oakridge Industries, Inc. 11 12 13 14 MURCHISON & CUMMING, LLP TYLER N. URE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 11730 6900 Westcliff Drive, Suite 605 Las Vegas, NV 89145 Attorney for Defendant The Prescott Companies 15 16 By: _________________________________________ /s/ Natalie Vazquez An Employee of MAIER GUTIERREZ & ASSOCIATES 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?