Mark Elliott v. Oakridge Industries, Inc., et al

Filing 93

ORDER Granting 89 Stipulation to Extend Time re 78 , 79 , 80 MOTIONS to Compel. See Order for deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 8/10/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

JOSEPH A. GUTIERREZ, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9046
STEVEN G. KNAUSS, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 12242
MAIER GUTIERREZ & ASSOCIATES
8816 Spanish Ridge Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
AMBER C. ROBINSON, ESQ.
Florida Bar No. 107215 (pro hac vice)
ROBINSON LAW OFFICE PLLC
695 Central Avenue, Suite 264
St. Petersburg, Florida 33712
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email: [e-mail]

11
12
13
14

RAFAL STRZALKOWSKI, ESQ.
Florida Bar No. 89248 (pro hac vice)
FLORIDA DISABILITY ACCESS AND AWARENESS FOUNDATION
2124 NW 142 ND Avenue
Gainesville, Florida 32609
Telephone:
[phone]
Email: [e-mail]

15
Attorneys for Plaintiff Mark Elliott
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

17
18
19

MARK ELLIOTT,

20
21
22
23
24

Case No. 2:15-cv-01143-APG-VCF
Plaintiff,

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPONSE
THE PRESCOTT COMPANIES, LLC dba TO DEFENDANT OAKRIDGE
PRESCOTT MANAGEMENT; OAKRIDGE INDUSTRIES, INC.’S MOTIONS TO
INDUSTRIES, INC., DOES I-X and ROE COMPEL [ECF Nos. 78, 79, & 80]
CORPORATIONS I-X, inclusive,
(SECOND REQUEST)
Defendants.
vs.

25
26

Plaintiff Mark Elliott, and Defendant Oakridge Industries, Inc., stipulate and agree, through

27

their respective counsels of record, that Plaintiff shall have an extension up to and including August

28

10, 2017, to file his response to Oakridge Industries, Inc.’s Motions to Compel [Docket/ECH Numbers
1

1

78, 79, and 80]. The parties enter into this stipulation to allow additional time to Plaintiff and

2

Plaintiff’s counsel to prepare a response.

3

Defendant Oakridge Industries, Inc. will file its reply by August, 24, 2017.

4

This is the Plaintiff’s first request for an extension of this deadline and it is submitted in good

5
6
7

faith without purpose of prejudice or undue delay.
DATED this 8th day of August, 2017.
MAIER GUTIERREZ & ASSOCIATES

WOOD, SMITH, HENNING & BERMAN LLC

__/s/ Steven G. Knauss______________
JOSEPH A. GUTIERREZ, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9046
STEVEN G. KNAUSS, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 12242
8816 Spanish Ridge Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89148
Local Counsel for Plaintiff Mark Elliott

___/s/ Brooke A. Bohlke_______________
BROOKE A. BOHLKE, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9374
7674 West Lake Mead Blvd., Suite 150
Las Vegas, NV 89128
Attorney for Defendant Oakridge Industries, Inc.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
ORDER
16
17

IT IS SO ORDERED.
8-10-2017
DATED:___________________

18
19
20

____________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

2

Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 5(b) and Electronic Filing Procedure IV(B), I certify that on the 8th day

3

of August, 2017, a true and correct copy of the STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION

4

OF TIME TO RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT OAKRIDGE INDUSTRIES, INC.’S MOTIONS

5

TO COMPEL [DKT. NOS. 78, 79, & 80], was transmitted electronically through the Court’s e-

6

filing electronic notice system to the attorney(s) associated with this case:

7
8
9
10

WOOD, SMITH, HENNING & BERMAN LLC
BROOKE A. BOHLKE, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9374
7674 West Lake Mead Blvd., Suite 150
Las Vegas, NV 89128
Attorney for Defendant Oakridge Industries, Inc.

11
12
13
14

MURCHISON & CUMMING, LLP
TYLER N. URE, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 11730
6900 Westcliff Drive, Suite 605
Las Vegas, NV 89145
Attorney for Defendant The Prescott Companies

15
16

By: _________________________________________
/s/ Natalie Vazquez
An Employee of MAIER GUTIERREZ & ASSOCIATES

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3