Heyman v. State of Nevada ex rel Board of Regents for the Nevada System of Higher Education et al
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 170 Defendant Rhonda Montgomery's First Ex Parte Motion to Extend Time and 173 her Second Ex Parte Motion to Extend Time to Oppose Plaintiff's Motion to Compel are denied as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 9/7/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
STATE OF NEVADA EX REL. BOARD OF
REGENTS OF THE NEVADA SYSTEM OF
HIGHER EDUCATION ON BEHALF OF
UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS, et al. )
Case No. 2:15-cv-01228-RFB-GWF
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Rhonda Montgomery’s First Ex Parte Motion to
Extend Time (ECF No. 170), filed on August 31, 2017. Also before the Court is Defendant
Montgomery’s Second Ex Parte Motion to Extend Time to Oppose Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel
(ECF No. 173), filed on September 1, 2017. Defendant requests an extension to file her opposition to
Plaintiff’s motion to compel. On August 31, 2017, the Court granted, in part, Defendant’s motion to
stay and set Defendant Montgomery’s opposition to Plaintiff’ motion to compel deadline to
September 8, 2017. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Rhonda Montgomery’s First Ex Parte Motion to
Extend Time (ECF No. 170) and her Second Ex Parte Motion to Extend Time to Oppose Plaintiff’s
Motion to Compel (ECF No. 173) are denied as moot.
DATED this 7th day of September, 2017.
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?