Heyman v. State of Nevada ex rel Board of Regents for the Nevada System of Higher Education et al
Filing
521
ORDER granting 520 Stipulation Requesting Change of Settlement Conference Date. IT IS ORDERED that the Settlement Conference is hereby continued and reset for Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. via video conference. The confidential briefs are due by noon on Thursday, October 22, 2020. All other provisions of the Court's Order 518 remain in effect. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 9/3/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
Case 2:15-cv-01228-APG-DJA Document 520 Filed 09/01/20 Page 1 of 2
521
09/03/20
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
AARON D. FORD
Attorney General
STEVE SHEVORSKI (Bar. No. 8256)
Chief Litigation Counsel
AKKE LEVIN (Bar. No. 9102)
Senior Deputy Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
555 E. Washington Ave., Ste. 3900
Las Vegas, NV 89101
(702) 486-3420 (phone)
(702) 486-3773 (fax)
sshevorski@ag.nv.gov
alevin@ag.nv.gov
Attorneys for Defendants State of Nevada ex rel.
Board of Regents of the Nevada System of Higher Education
on Behalf of the University of Nevada, Las Vegas; and
Kristin Malek
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
13
DARREN HEYMAN,
Case No. 2:15-cv-01228-APG-DJA
Plaintiff,
14
15
vs.
16
STATE OF NEVADA EX REL. BOARD OF
REGENTS OF THE NEVADA SYSTEM OF
HIGHER EDUCATION ON BEHALF OF
THE UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, LAS
VEGAS; NEAL SMATRESK; DONALD
SNYDER; STOWE SHOEMAKER;
RHONDA MONTGOMERY; CURTIS
LOVE; SARAH TANFORD; PHILLIP
BURNS; KRISTIN MALEK; LISA MOLLCAIN; DEBRA PIERUSCHKA; ELSA
SIDHU AND DOES I-X INCLUSIVE,
17
18
19
20
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER
REQUESTING CHANGE OF DATE
FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
Defendant.
22
23
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff Darren Heyman and Defendants
24
State of Nevada ex rel. Board of Regents of the Nevada System of Higher Education on
25
behalf of the University of Nevada Las Vegas and Kristin Malek (collectively "Defendants"),
26
by and through their undersigned counsel, as follows:
27
28
1.
The Court noticed September 22, 2020 as the date to hold the settlement
conference. See Order (ECF No. 518). The Order requires, in relevant part, the attendance
Page 1 of 2
Case 2:15-cv-01228-APG-DJA Document 520 Filed 09/01/20 Page 2 of 2
521
09/03/20
1
"in person" of a "representative with binding authority to settle this matter up to the full
2
amount of the claim." Id. at 1, ll. 24-28.
3
4
5
6
2.
Defendants’ tort claim manager is unavailable to remotely attend the
settlement conference on September 22.
3.
The parties jointly propose the following alternative dates and times so that
all the parties and their representatives can attend:
7
a.
Monday, October 12, 2020, after 11:00 a.m.;
8
b.
Wednesday, October 14, 2020, between 11:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.;
9
c.
Monday October 19, 2020, after 11:00 a.m.;
10
d.
Wednesday, October 21, 2020, between 11:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.; and
11
e.
Monday, October 26, 2020, after 11:00 a.m.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
4.
The parties further stipulate that the confidential settlement statements
will not be due until seven days before the rescheduled date set by the Magistrate Judge.
DATED this 1st day of September, 2020.
AARON D. FORD
Attorney General
By: /s/ Akke Levin
Akke Levin (Bar. No. 9102)
Senior Deputy Attorney General
Steve Shevorski (Bar No. 8256)
Chief Litigation Counsel
Attorneys for Defendants
By: /s/ Darren Heyman
Darren Heyman
6671 Las Vegas Blvd., S., #D-210
Las Vegas, NV 89119
Plaintiff Pro Se
IT IS SO ORDERED. The Settlement Conference is hereby continued and reset for
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. via video conference. The confidential
DATED this _____ day of September, 2020.
briefs are due by noon on Thursday, October 22, 2020. All other provisions of the
Court's Order (ECF No. 518) remain in effect.
24
25
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
DATED: September 3, 2020
27
28
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?