Heyman v. State of Nevada ex rel Board of Regents for the Nevada System of Higher Education et al

Filing 521

ORDER granting 520 Stipulation Requesting Change of Settlement Conference Date. IT IS ORDERED that the Settlement Conference is hereby continued and reset for Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. via video conference. The confidential briefs are due by noon on Thursday, October 22, 2020. All other provisions of the Court's Order 518 remain in effect. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 9/3/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)

Download PDF
Case 2:15-cv-01228-APG-DJA Document 520 Filed 09/01/20 Page 1 of 2 521 09/03/20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 AARON D. FORD Attorney General STEVE SHEVORSKI (Bar. No. 8256) Chief Litigation Counsel AKKE LEVIN (Bar. No. 9102) Senior Deputy Attorney General Office of the Attorney General 555 E. Washington Ave., Ste. 3900 Las Vegas, NV 89101 (702) 486-3420 (phone) (702) 486-3773 (fax) sshevorski@ag.nv.gov alevin@ag.nv.gov Attorneys for Defendants State of Nevada ex rel. Board of Regents of the Nevada System of Higher Education on Behalf of the University of Nevada, Las Vegas; and Kristin Malek 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 13 DARREN HEYMAN, Case No. 2:15-cv-01228-APG-DJA Plaintiff, 14 15 vs. 16 STATE OF NEVADA EX REL. BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE NEVADA SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION ON BEHALF OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS; NEAL SMATRESK; DONALD SNYDER; STOWE SHOEMAKER; RHONDA MONTGOMERY; CURTIS LOVE; SARAH TANFORD; PHILLIP BURNS; KRISTIN MALEK; LISA MOLLCAIN; DEBRA PIERUSCHKA; ELSA SIDHU AND DOES I-X INCLUSIVE, 17 18 19 20 21 STIPULATION AND ORDER REQUESTING CHANGE OF DATE FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Defendant. 22 23 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff Darren Heyman and Defendants 24 State of Nevada ex rel. Board of Regents of the Nevada System of Higher Education on 25 behalf of the University of Nevada Las Vegas and Kristin Malek (collectively "Defendants"), 26 by and through their undersigned counsel, as follows: 27 28 1. The Court noticed September 22, 2020 as the date to hold the settlement conference. See Order (ECF No. 518). The Order requires, in relevant part, the attendance Page 1 of 2 Case 2:15-cv-01228-APG-DJA Document 520 Filed 09/01/20 Page 2 of 2 521 09/03/20 1 "in person" of a "representative with binding authority to settle this matter up to the full 2 amount of the claim." Id. at 1, ll. 24-28. 3 4 5 6 2. Defendants’ tort claim manager is unavailable to remotely attend the settlement conference on September 22. 3. The parties jointly propose the following alternative dates and times so that all the parties and their representatives can attend: 7 a. Monday, October 12, 2020, after 11:00 a.m.; 8 b. Wednesday, October 14, 2020, between 11:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.; 9 c. Monday October 19, 2020, after 11:00 a.m.; 10 d. Wednesday, October 21, 2020, between 11:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m.; and 11 e. Monday, October 26, 2020, after 11:00 a.m. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 4. The parties further stipulate that the confidential settlement statements will not be due until seven days before the rescheduled date set by the Magistrate Judge. DATED this 1st day of September, 2020. AARON D. FORD Attorney General By: /s/ Akke Levin Akke Levin (Bar. No. 9102) Senior Deputy Attorney General Steve Shevorski (Bar No. 8256) Chief Litigation Counsel Attorneys for Defendants By: /s/ Darren Heyman Darren Heyman 6671 Las Vegas Blvd., S., #D-210 Las Vegas, NV 89119 Plaintiff Pro Se IT IS SO ORDERED. The Settlement Conference is hereby continued and reset for IT IS SO ORDERED. Thursday, October 29, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. via video conference. The confidential DATED this _____ day of September, 2020. briefs are due by noon on Thursday, October 22, 2020. All other provisions of the Court's Order (ECF No. 518) remain in effect. 24 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 DATED: September 3, 2020 27 28 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?