Petrarca v. Aranas et al

Filing 28

ORDER that the Court will dismiss the case in ninety (90) days if there is no motion to substitute filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(1). FURTHER ORDERED that 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 8/22/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 10 11 12 RICHARD W. PETRARCA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. 2:15 -cv-01231-RFB-CWH v. ) ) DR. ARANAS, et al., ) ) ORDER Defendants. ) ) ___________________________________ ) 13 I. DISCUSSION 14 On June 29, 2015, Plaintiff, then a prisoner in the custody of the Nevada 15 Department of Corrections (“NDOC”), initiated this prisoner civil rights action pursuant to 42 16 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1-1). On January 6, 2016, this Court issued a screening order, 17 allowing some of Plaintiff’s claims to proceed and dismissing others with leave to amend. 18 (ECF No. 14). On June 2, 2016, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. (ECF No. 26). On 19 June 20, 2016, Plaintiff died at Valley Hospital Medical Center.1 On July 13, 2016, 20 Plaintiff’s counsel filed a “Notice of Death of Plaintiff.” (ECF No. 17). Accordingly, the 21 Court takes judicial notice of Plaintiff’s death under Fed. R. Evid. 201. 22 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(1), “[i]f a party dies and the claim 23 is not extinguished, the court may order substitution of the proper party. A motion for 24 substitution may be made by any party or by the decedents’ successor or representative. If 25 the motion is not made within ninety (90) days after service of a statement noting death, 26 27 28 1 See Jackson, Raven, Inmate dies at Valley Hospital in Las Vegas, Las Vegas ReviewJournal, June 21, 2016, http://www.reviewjournal.com/news/las-vegas/inmate-dies-valley-hospital-las-vegas. 1 the action by or against the decedent must be dismissed.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1). As 2 such, if there is no motion for substitution within ninety (90) days of the date of this order, 3 the Court will dismiss the case. 4 II. 5 CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the Court will dismiss the case in 6 ninety (90) days if there is no motion to substitute filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 7 Procedure 25(a)(1). 8 9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) is denied at moot. 10 11 DATED: This 22nd day of August, 2016. 12 13 14 ________________________ Richard F. Boulware, II United States District Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?