Walker v. Renee Baker, et al

Filing 148

ORDER. Good cause appearing, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents' motion to extend time (ECF No. 147 ) is GRANTED. Respondents' reply in support of their motion to dismiss (ECF No. 135 ), response to petitioner's motion for ev identiary hearing (ECF No. 144 ), and response to petitioner's renewed motion for discovery (ECF No. 143 ) are due October 21, 2024. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents' prior motions for extension of time (ECF Nos. 145 / 146 ) are denied as moot. Replies due by 10/21/2024. Responses due by 10/21/2024. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 9/24/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 JAMES RAY WALKER, 4 5 Petitioner, Case No.: 2:15-cv-01240-RFB-EJY ORDER v. 6 WILLIAM GITTERE, et al., 7 Respondents. 8 9 Respondents, through counsel, move to extend time to file their reply in support of their 10 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 135), response to petitioner’s motion for evidentiary hearing (ECF 11 No. 144), and response to petitioner’s renewed motion for discovery (ECF No. 143). ECF No. 147. 12 The motion appears to be filed in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay. 13 Good cause appearing, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents’ motion to 14 extend time (ECF No. 147) is GRANTED. Respondents’ reply in support of their motion to dismiss 15 (ECF No. 135), response to petitioner’s motion for evidentiary hearing (ECF No. 144), and 16 response to petitioner’s renewed motion for discovery (ECF No. 143) are due October 21, 2024. 17 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents’ prior motions for extension of time (ECF 18 Nos. 145/146) are denied as moot. 19 20 21 22 23 DATED: September 23, 2024 _________________________________ RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?