Walker v. Renee Baker, et al
Filing
148
ORDER. Good cause appearing, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents' motion to extend time (ECF No. 147 ) is GRANTED. Respondents' reply in support of their motion to dismiss (ECF No. 135 ), response to petitioner's motion for ev identiary hearing (ECF No. 144 ), and response to petitioner's renewed motion for discovery (ECF No. 143 ) are due October 21, 2024. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents' prior motions for extension of time (ECF Nos. 145 / 146 ) are denied as moot. Replies due by 10/21/2024. Responses due by 10/21/2024. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 9/24/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3 JAMES RAY WALKER,
4
5
Petitioner,
Case No.: 2:15-cv-01240-RFB-EJY
ORDER
v.
6 WILLIAM GITTERE, et al.,
7
Respondents.
8
9
Respondents, through counsel, move to extend time to file their reply in support of their
10 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 135), response to petitioner’s motion for evidentiary hearing (ECF
11 No. 144), and response to petitioner’s renewed motion for discovery (ECF No. 143). ECF No. 147.
12 The motion appears to be filed in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay.
13
Good cause appearing, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents’ motion to
14 extend time (ECF No. 147) is GRANTED. Respondents’ reply in support of their motion to dismiss
15 (ECF No. 135), response to petitioner’s motion for evidentiary hearing (ECF No. 144), and
16 response to petitioner’s renewed motion for discovery (ECF No. 143) are due October 21, 2024.
17
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents’ prior motions for extension of time (ECF
18 Nos. 145/146) are denied as moot.
19
20
21
22
23
DATED: September 23, 2024
_________________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?