First 100, LLC v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation et al
Filing
56
ORDER that 54 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED. Plaintiff First 100, LLC's complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. The defendants' counterclaims remain pending subject to the stay previously entered. See ECFNo. 42 . Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
FIRST 100, LLC,
5
6
7
8
Case No. 2:15-cv-01303-APG-PAL
Plaintiff,
v.
FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE
CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
9
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION AND
DISMISSING THE PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT
(ECF No. 54)
10
11
On March 7, 2018, Magistrate Judge Leen issued a report and recommendation in which
12
she recommends that I dismiss plaintiff First 100, LLC’s complaint because First 100 has failed
13
to comply with court orders that it obtain counsel and has not kept the court apprised of a current
14
address. First 100 did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review
15
of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de
16
novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which
17
objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc)
18
(“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if
19
objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Leen’s report and recommendation
20
21
(ECF No. 54) is accepted. Plaintiff First 100, LLC’s complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.
22
The defendants’ counterclaims remain pending subject to the stay previously entered. See ECF
23
No. 42.
24
DATED this 2nd day of April, 2018.
25
26
27
28
ANDREW P. GORDON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?