Capital One, National Association v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC
Filing
61
ORDER Granting 60 Stipulation re Discovery Deadlines (Third Request). In the event Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is denied, the parties shall submit a stipulation and proposed order within 14 days of decision of the pending motion for summary judgment to request reinstatement of the motion to compel and complete the deposition described in this stipulation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 1/10/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Case 2:15-cv-01324-KJD-PAL Document 60 Filed 01/09/17 Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Abran E. Vigil
Nevada Bar No. 7548
Matthew D. Lamb
Nevada Bar No. 12991
Joseph P. Sakai
Nevada Bar No. 13578
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
100 North City Parkway, Suite 1750
Las Vegas, Nevada 89106
Telephone: (702) 471-7000
Facsimile: (702) 471-7070
vigila@ballardspahr.com
lambm@ballardspahr.com
sakaij@ballardspahr.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff/CounterDefendant
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
(702) 471-7000 FAX (702) 471-7070
12
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89106
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
100 NORTH CITY PARKWAY, SUITE 1750
10
13
14
15
16
17
CAPITAL ONE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
a national banking association,
Plaintiff,
vs.
20
STIPULATION REGARDING
MOTION TO COMPEL,
DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS, AND
JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, a Nevada
limited liability company; SOUTHERN
(Third Request)
HIGHLANDS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION,
a Nevada non-profit corporation,
18
19
Case No. 2:15-cv-01324-KJD-PAL
Defendants.
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, a Nevada
limited liability company,
21
Counterclaimant/Cross-Claimant,
22
vs.
23
24
CAPITAL ONE, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
a national banking association; and EILAT
BENARON, an individual,
25
Counter-Defendants/Cross-Defendants.
26
27
Plaintiff Capital One, National Association (“Capital One”), defendant SFR
28
Investments Pool 1, LLC (“SFR”), and defendant Southern Highlands Community
DMWEST #15353945 v2
Case 2:15-cv-01324-KJD-PAL Document 60 Filed 01/09/17 Page 2 of 4
1
Association (“Southern Highlands,” and together with Capital One and SFR, the
2
“Parties”) stipulate as follows:
3
1.
On September 5, 2016, the Court entered an order (ECF No. 56)
4
granting the Parties’ stipulation to stay litigation based on the Ninth Circuit’s
5
decision in Bourne Valley Court Tr. v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA, 832 F.3d 1154 (9th Cir.
6
2016).
7
8
2.
the Ninth Circuit issued its mandate in Bourne Valley.
9
10
3.
(702) 471-7000 FAX (702) 471-7070
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89106
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
100 NORTH CITY PARKWAY, SUITE 1750
The order further provided that the dispositive motion deadline would
automatically reset to 30 days after the date the Ninth Circuit issued its mandate.
11
12
The order provided that the litigation stay would automatically lift when
4.
The order further provided that Capital One would be permitted to
depose SFR’s expert witness, Michael Brunson, after the stay was lifted.
13
5.
The Court subsequently issued a minute order (ECF No. 57) which
14
deemed Capital One’s motion to compel against SFR (ECF No. 52) withdrawn. The
15
minute order stated the Parties could request reinstatement of the motion to compel
16
after the litigation stay was lifted.
17
18
19
20
21
6.
The Ninth Circuit issued its mandate in Bourne Valley on December 14,
7.
Accordingly, the dispositive motions deadline automatically reset to
2016.
January 13, 2017.
8.
On December 29, 2016, SFR filed a Motion to Certify Question of Law to
22
Supreme Court of Nevada (ECF No. 58) and a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
23
re: a Pure Issue of Law: Application of the Return Doctrine Post-Bourne Valley (ECF
24
No. 59).
25
9.
Capital One intends to file a motion for summary judgment on or before
26
the January 13, 2017 deadline. The motion will address various arguments which do
27
not require the Parties to hold the deposition of Brunson or to reinstate Capital One’s
28
motion to compel.
Capital One’s motion will be limited to three issues: (1) that
2
DMWEST #15353945 v2
Case 2:15-cv-01324-KJD-PAL Document 60 Filed 01/09/17 Page 3 of 4
1
Capital One is entitled to summary judgment under Bourne Valley, (2) that the
2
Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 preempted the subject foreclosure sale
3
from extinguishing the subject deed of trust, and (3) that the Nevada Supreme
4
Court’s opinion in SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. Adv.
5
Rep. 75, 334 P.3d 408 (2014), does not apply retroactively.
6
10.
In the event the Court denies Capital One’s planned motion for
the foreclosure sale price, the validity of the foreclosure sale under Shadow Wood
11
Homeowners Ass’n v. N.Y. Cmty. Bancorp. Inc., 132 Nev. Adv. Rep. 5, 366 P.3d 1105
12
(702) 471-7000 FAX (702) 471-7070
One’s planned motion. These issues include, among other things, the sufficiency of
10
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89106
the motion to compel, and to litigate any remaining issues not addressed in Capital
9
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
summary judgment, the Parties agree to hold the deposition of Brunson, to reinstate
8
100 NORTH CITY PARKWAY, SUITE 1750
7
(2016), and Capital One’s argument that the sale is a constructively fraudulent
13
transfer.
14
11.
Accordingly, if the Court denies Capital One’s planned motion for
15
summary judgment, the Parties will submit a further stipulation that reinstates
16
Capital One’s motion to compel, schedules a date and time for the deposition of
17
Brunson, sets a deadline for filing any dispositive motions on the remaining issues in
18
the case, and sets a new deadline for the joint pretrial order.
19
12.
Good cause exists for granting this stipulation because it will not be
20
necessary to hold the deposition of Brunson, to reinstate the motion to compel, or to
21
litigate any additional issues if the Court grants Capital One’s planned motion for
22
summary judgment.
23
13.
The Court previously granted a stipulation to extend the dispositive
24
motions deadline from April 15, 2016 to July 14, 2016 and to extend the pretrial order
25
deadline from May 13, 2016 to August 11, 2016 (ECF No. 37). This extension was
26
primarily due to a medical issue affecting Southern Highlands’ Rule 30(b)(6)
27
deponent. The Court later granted a stipulation to extend the dispositive motion
28
deadline to September 12, 2016 and to extend the pretrial order deadline to October
3
DMWEST #15353945 v2
Case 2:15-cv-01324-KJD-PAL Document 60 Filed 01/09/17 Page 4 of 4
1
11, 2016 (ECF No. 43). These deadlines were vacated when the Ninth Circuit issued
2
its Bourne Valley opinion and the Court stayed litigation.
3
Dated: January 9, 2017.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
KIM GILBERT EBRON
By: /s/ Matthew D. Lamb
Abran E. Vigil
Nevada Bar No. 7548
Matthew D. Lamb
Nevada Bar No. 12991
Joseph P. Sakai
Nevada Bar No. 13578
100 North City Pkwy, Suite 1750
Las Vegas, Nevada 89106
By: /s/ Diana Cline Ebron
Diana Cline Ebron
Nevada Bar No. 10580
Jacqueline Gilbert
Nevada Bar No. 10593
Karen L. Hanks
Nevada Bar No. 9578
7625 Dean Martin Drive, Suite 110
Las Vegas, Nevada 89139
ATTORNEYS FOR CAPITAL ONE, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION
ATTORNEYS FOR SFR INVESTMENTS POOL
1, LLC
(702) 471-7000 FAX (702) 471-7070
12
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89106
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
100 NORTH CITY PARKWAY, SUITE 1750
11
BALLARD SPAHR LLP
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
ALVERSON TAYLOR MORTENSEN &
SANDERS
By: /s/ David J. Rothenberg
Kurt R. Bonds
Nevada Bar No. 6228
David J. Rothenberg
Nevada Bar No. 13576
7401 West Charleston Blvd.
Las Vegas, Nevada 89117
ATTORNEYS FOR SOUTHERN HIGHLANDS
COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION
IT IS ORDERED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in the event Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is
IT IS SO ORDERED:
21 denied, the parties shall submit a stipulation and proposed order within 14 days of
decision of the pending motion for summary judgment to request reinstatement of the
22 motion to compel and complete the deposition described in this stipulation.
20
23
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
24
Dated: January 10, 2017.
25
26
27
28
4
DMWEST #15353945 v2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?