Williams v. Neven et al

Filing 40

ORDER re 38 Settlement Conference (See Order for Details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/25/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 MICHAEL WILLIAMS, 11 Plaintiff(s), 12 vs. 13 DWIGHT W. NEVEN, et al., 14 Defendant(s). 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:15-cv-01327-GMN-NJK NOTICE 16 Upon receiving notice from another chambers of a potential scheduling conflict, the Court 17 rescheduled the settlement conference in this case. Docket No. 38. The Court issues this notice to 18 separately explain that the manner in which Defendants relayed that information to the undersigned was 19 not proper. The proper mechanism for bringing a potential scheduling conflict to the Court’s attention 20 is to file a written request to continue the settlement conference to a different date that explains the 21 circumstances giving rise to the scheduling conflict See, e.g., Docket No. 38 at 1 n.1 (“Any request to 22 change the date of the settlement conference must be made in writing and must be filed within 7 days 23 of the issuance of this order”). Contacting another judge’s chambers to ask them to expend their 24 resources to explain to the undersigned’s staff that a scheduling conflict exists is not proper. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 DATED: July 25, 2017 27 28 ______________________________________ Nancy J. Koppe United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?