Williams v. Neven et al

Filing 40

ORDER re 38 Settlement Conference (See Order for Details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/25/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
MICHAEL WILLIAMS,
11
Plaintiff(s),
12
vs.
13
DWIGHT W. NEVEN, et al.,
14
Defendant(s).
15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:15-cv-01327-GMN-NJK
NOTICE

16

Upon receiving notice from another chambers of a potential scheduling conflict, the Court

17

rescheduled the settlement conference in this case. Docket No. 38. The Court issues this notice to

18

separately explain that the manner in which Defendants relayed that information to the undersigned was

19

not proper. The proper mechanism for bringing a potential scheduling conflict to the Court’s attention

20

is to file a written request to continue the settlement conference to a different date that explains the

21

circumstances giving rise to the scheduling conflict See, e.g., Docket No. 38 at 1 n.1 (“Any request to

22

change the date of the settlement conference must be made in writing and must be filed within 7 days

23

of the issuance of this order”). Contacting another judge’s chambers to ask them to expend their

24

resources to explain to the undersigned’s staff that a scheduling conflict exists is not proper.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

DATED: July 25, 2017

27
28

______________________________________
Nancy J. Koppe
United States Magistrate Judge