Williams v. Neven et al
ORDER re 38 Settlement Conference (See Order for Details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/25/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
DWIGHT W. NEVEN, et al.,
Case No. 2:15-cv-01327-GMN-NJK
Upon receiving notice from another chambers of a potential scheduling conflict, the Court
rescheduled the settlement conference in this case. Docket No. 38. The Court issues this notice to
separately explain that the manner in which Defendants relayed that information to the undersigned was
not proper. The proper mechanism for bringing a potential scheduling conflict to the Court’s attention
is to file a written request to continue the settlement conference to a different date that explains the
circumstances giving rise to the scheduling conflict See, e.g., Docket No. 38 at 1 n.1 (“Any request to
change the date of the settlement conference must be made in writing and must be filed within 7 days
of the issuance of this order”). Contacting another judge’s chambers to ask them to expend their
resources to explain to the undersigned’s staff that a scheduling conflict exists is not proper.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: July 25, 2017
Nancy J. Koppe
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?