Dixon Legacy Transportation Systems, LLC

Filing 88

ORDER Granting 87 Stipulation for Extension of Time (Fourth Request) re Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 5/2/2017. Motions due by 6/1/2017. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 6/30/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/21/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
Case 2:15-cv-01359-JAD-PAL Document 87 Filed 04/19/17 Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 STEVEN T. JAFFE Nevada Bar No. 7035 jaffe@lawhjc.com JASON R. WIGG Nevada Bar No. 7953 jwigg@lawhjc.com 4 HALL JAFFE & CLAYTON, LLP 5 7425 PEAK DRIVE LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89128 (702) 316-4111 FAX (702) 316-4114 6 7 8 9 Attorneys for Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiff Legacy Transportation Systems, LLC, Angeles Transportation, LLC & Leoncio Angeles 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 SARAH DIXON, CASE NO. 2:15-cv-01359 13 Plaintiff, 14 vs. 15 16 17 LEGACY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, LLC,; a Utah Limited Liability Company; ANGELES TRANSPORTATION, LLC; a Utah Limited Liability Company, LEONCIO ANGELES; STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLETE DISCOVERY (FOURTH REQUEST) 18 19 20 21 Defendants. ______________________________________ LEGACY TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, LLC; ANGELES TRANSPORTATION, LLC; AND LEONCIO ANGELES, Third-Party Plaintiffs, 22 vs. 23 RYAN RICHARDS, 24 Third-Party Defendant. 25 26 Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff Legacy Transportation Systems, LLC; Angeles 27 Transportation, LLC; Leoncio Angeles (collectively, “the Legacy Defendants”); Plaintiff Sarah 28 Dixon (“Plaintiff”); and Third-Party Defendant Ryan Richards (“Richards”), by and through their Case 2:15-cv-01359-JAD-PAL Document 87 Filed 04/19/17 Page 2 of 5 1 respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to extend discovery for 14 days only the 2 limited purpose of completing four specific depositions only that, due to scheduling issues and the 3 need to travel to Utah, could not be completed before the end of the current discovery cut-off 4 date. 5 I. Discovery Completed to Date The Parties have been diligently conducting discovery efforts as follows: 6 7 1. The parties have exchanged initial documents and witness lists; 8 2. The parties have conducted written discovery and responded to those requests; 9 3. Plaintiff has served Multiple Supplemental Document/Witness Disclosures; 10 4. The Legacy Defendants have served Multiple Supplemental Document/Witness Disclosures; 11 12 5. Richards has served Supplemental Document/Witness Disclosures; 13 6. Plaintiff has disclosed and served reports from the following experts: 14 a. Chris P. Reyes, MRC, CRC; 15 b. Joseph T. Crouse, Ph.D., MBA, CPA; 16 c. Kathleen Smith, MD 17 d. Brian K. Jones, MSBI, P.E. ACTAR, CXLT 18 7. The Legacy Defendants have disclosed and served reports from the following experts: 19 a. 20 b. Carol Hyland, M.A., M.S. 21 c. Dr. Mary Ann Shannon. 22 d. William Anderson, Ph. D., DABFT 23 8. Richards has disclosed/designated the following expert witness: a. Trooper Michael Tully 24 25 Michael Dilich, P.E.; 9. The parties have completed the following depositions: 26 a. Plaintiff Sarah Dixon; 27 b. Third-Party Defendant Ryan Richards; 28 c. Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff Leoncio Angeles; -2- -2- Case 2:15-cv-01359-JAD-PAL Document 87 Filed 04/19/17 Page 3 of 5 1 d. Trooper Michael Tully; 2 e. Trooper Peter Sorenson; 3 f. Out of State Percipient Witness Brent Allen; 4 g. Out of State Percipient Witness Darrell Brown 5 h. Out of State Percipient Witness Ashley Greving (Melissant; 6 i. Out of State Percipient Witness Joshua Annand; 7 j. Chris P. Reyes, MRC, CRC; 8 k. Joseph T. Crouse, Ph.D., MBA, CPA; 9 l. Dan Berkabile 10 m. Dr. Ryan Andrew Fan (in City of Industry, CA); 11 n. Dr. Christopher Long (at Camp Pendleton in Oceanside, CA) 12 o. Brian K. Jones, MSBE, P.E., ACTAR, CXLT 13 p. Dr. Christine Maloney 14 q. Dr. Kathleen D. Smith 15 16 17 II. 1. Discovery That Remains to Be Completed The parties are requesting discovery be extended solely for the purpose of completing the following depositions: 18 a. Percipient Witness Kevin Angeles (in Utah on or about 4/28/17); 19 b. Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff Leoncio Angeles (continuation, in Utah on or 20 21 22 23 about 4/28/17); c. Legacy Transportation Systems, LLC ‘s FRCP 30(B)(6) Witness(es) (in Utah on or about 4/28/17); d. Expert Brian Jones MSBE, P.E., ACTAR, CXLT, (in LV and based on his rebuttal 24 report and within the next 2-3 weeks depending on his and counsel’s availability) 25 e. Subject to this Court’s ruling on Plaintiff’s Motion to Substitute Expert [ECF No. 26 76], the deposition of Plaintiff’s Substitute Expert to be schedule after production 27 of the expert’s report, as well as the Legacy Defendants’ rebuttal expert’s 28 deposition. -3- -3- Case 2:15-cv-01359-JAD-PAL Document 87 Filed 04/19/17 Page 4 of 5 III. Reason Why Discovery Remaining Was Not Completed 1 2 The parties have diligently completed nearly all discovery necessary to prepare this matter 3 for trial. In that regard, the parties have completed all discovery and depositions but for the those 4 set forth above (not including Plaintiff’s discovery-related Motion [ECF No. 76] that is currently 5 the subject of motion practice). The depositions set forth above simply could not be conducted 6 and/or completed before the expiration of the discovery cut-off date due to the witness’ and/or 7 counsel’s availability. Further, assurances were made by and between counsel that these 8 depositions could be completed; in fact, but for the issues with coordinating all counsel, travel 9 and the availability of witnesses (principally Mr. Angeles, who is a long-haul truck driver), these 10 depositions likely would have been completed before the currently set discovery cut-off date. We 11 have since confirmed the availability of all Utah-based deponents for April 28, 2017. So that 12 these depositions may be completed in this case, most of which have already been noticed, the 13 parties respectfully submit the instant stipulation and proposed order extending the discovery cut- 14 off date by 14 days so these four depositions only may be completed. No other discovery shall be 15 conducted but for these depositions, unless the Court grants Plaintiff’s Motion to Substitute 16 Expert. 17 Proposed Schedule For Completing Discovery 18 1. Last day to amend pleadings/add parties: (Closed) 19 2. Last day to disclose initial expert witnesses: (Closed)1 20 3. Last day to file interim status report: (Closed) 21 4. Last day to file rebuttal expert disclosures: (Closed)2 22 5. Last day to complete discovery: May 2, 2017 (Monday) 23 6. Last day to file dispositive motions: June 1, 2017 (Thursday) 24 25 7. Last day to submit pre-trial order: June 30, 2017 (Friday) (If dispositive motions are filed, the joint pretrial order is due thirty (30) days from the entry of the court’s rulings on the motions.) 26 1 27 This deadline is the subject of a Motion to Substitute Expert [ECF No. 76] filed by Plaintiff that is currently set for hearing on May 8, 2017 [ECF No. 85]. 28 2 This deadline may also be impacted by Plaintiff’s Motion to Substitute Expert. -4- -4- Case 2:15-cv-01359-JAD-PAL Document 87 Filed 04/19/17 Page 5 of 5 1 Dated this 19th day of April, 2017 Dated this 19th day of April, 2016 2 HALL JAFFE & CLAYTON, LLP MCCULLOUGH, PEREZ & DOBBERSTEIN LTD. By: /s/ Jason R. Wigg, Esq. STEVEN T. JAFFE Nevada Bar No. 7305 JASON R. WIGG, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7953 7425 Peak Drive Las Vegas, NV 89128 Attorneys for Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiff Legacy Transportation Systems, LLC, Angeles Transportation, LLC & Leoncio Angeles By: /s/ Christopher McCullough, Esq. CHRISTOPHER McCULLOUGH, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 1138 601 South Rancho Drive, #A-10 Las Vegas, Nevada 89106 Attorneys for Plaintiff 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 15 RANALLI ZANIEL FOWLER & MORAN, LLC By /s/ Benjamin J. Carman, Esq. BENJAMIN J. CARMAN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12565 2400 W. Horizon Ridge Parkway Henderson, Nevada 89052 Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant, Ryan Richards 10 14 Dated this 19th day of April, 2017 ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED: 16 17 18 ____________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE April 21, 2017 DATED: _______________ 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -5- -5-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?