Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC
Filing
134
ORDER Joint Status Report due by 6/14/2020. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/17/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
Case 2:15-cv-01377-JCM-NJK Document 134 Filed 04/17/20 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
8
CARRINGTON MORTGAGE SERVICES,
LLC,
ORDER
Plaintiff(s),
9
v.
10
11
Case No. 2:15-CV-1377 JCM (NJK)
SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC,
Defendant(s).
12
13
Presently before the court is the matter of Carrington Mortgage Services, LLC v. SFR
14
15
Investments Pool 1, LLC, case number 2:15-cv-01377-JCM-NJK.
On April 15, 2020, the court granted the parties’ stipulation to continue the status
16
17
18
19
20
conference scheduled for May 14, 2020, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. (ECF Nos. 132;
133). The parties requested the court schedule the status conference after June 14. (ECF No. 132).
However, the proposed order the parties submitted vacated, rather than continuing, the hearing.
Id. Thus, the court vacated the hearing. (ECF No. 133).
After the Ninth Circuit remanded this case, it seems that the only issue before the court is
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
“whether the superpriority portion of the lien was satisfied by the tender.” (ECF No. 125 at 5). In
light of the uncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic and the single issue remaining in
this case, the court orders the parties to file a joint status report on or before June 14, 2020, in lieu
of any in-person hearing.
...
...
...
Case 2:15-cv-01377-JCM-NJK Document 134 Filed 04/17/20 Page 2 of 2
1
Accordingly,
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
DATED April 17, 2020.
4
5
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?