Tagle v. State of Nevada et al
Filing
57
ORDER denying without prejudice 38 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order.; denying without prejudice 49 Motion.; denying without prejudice 51 Motion.; denying without prejudice 54 Motion.; denying without prejudice 55 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 10/5/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
Victor Tagle,
4
2:15-cv-01402-JAD-VCF
Plaintiff
Order Denying Pending Motions
in Light of Stay
5
v.
6
State of Nevada, NDOC, NDOC’s
Employees, et al.,
[ECF No. 38, 59, 51, 54, 55]
7
Defendants
8
9
On September 29, 2016, Magistrate Judge Ferenbach granted the defendants’ motion to
10
11
stay this case pending a decision in Tagle’s identical state-court action.1 In light of this stay and
12
in the interest of judicial economy, Tagle’s:
C
13
Motion to Reconsider [ECF No. 38] the denial of his motion for a restraining
order2;
14
15
C
Motion to Include Affidavit [ECF No. 49];
16
C
Motion to Submit Affidavit [ECF No. 51];
17
C
Motion to request to file acknowledge punishment of the fraud perpetrators
[ECF No. 54]; and
18
C
19
Motion for Default [ECF No. 55]
20
are DENIED without prejudice to their refiling after the stay in this case is lifted. Tagle is
21
reminded that the proceedings in this case are STAYED, and it is unlikely that the court will act
22
on any further requests in this case while the stay is in effect. Further motions will likely be
23
summarily denied without prejudice.
DATED: October 5, 2016
24
_______________________________
Jennifer A. Dorsey
United States District Judge
25
26
27
28
1
ECF No. 52.
2
ECF No. 33.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?