Metro PCS v. A2Z Connection, LLC et al

Filing 171

ORDER granting 170 Stipulation; Re: 166 Motion to Dismiss, 168 Motion to Seal, 167 Motion to Compel. Responses for 166 Motion due by 11/15/2019. Responses for 167 , 168 Motions due by 11/20/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 10/31/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

Download PDF
Case 2:15-cv-01412-JAD-DJA Document 170 Filed 10/30/19 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 THE WRIGHT LAW GROUP P.C. 2340 Paseo Del Prado, Suite D-305 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 Tel: (702) 405-0001 Fax: (702) 405-8454 10 11 JOHN HENRY WRIGHT, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6182 CHRISTOPHER B. PHILLIPS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 14600 AMY J. SMITH, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 14954 THE WRIGHT LAW GROUP, P.C. 2340 Paseo Del Prado, Suite D-305 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 Telephone: (702) 405-0001 Facsimile: (702) 405-8454 Email: john@wrightlawgroupnv.com chris@wrightlawgroupnv.com amys@wrightlawgroupnv.com Attorneys for Defendants AMIR QURESHI a/k/a AMIER QURESHI, a/k/a AMIER I. QURESHI, a/k/a AMIER F. QURESHI, SR.; ASIM QURESHI a/k/a ALEX QURESHI, a/k/a AZIM QURESHI a/k/a AZIM DeDREAM, and SEHER QURESHI 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 14 15 METROPCS, a brand of T-MOBILE USA, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, 16 17 vs. 18 A2Z CONNECTION, LLC, a Nevada limited liability corporation; A2Z LLC, a Nevada limited liability corporation; AMIR QURESHI a/k/a AMIER QURESHI, a/k/a AMIER I. QURESHI, a/k/a AMIER F. QURESHI, SR.; ASIM QURESHI a/k/a ALEX QURESHI, a/k/a AZIM QURESHI a/k/a AZIM DeDREAM, and SEHER QURESHI, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Case No. 2:15-cv-01412-JAD-DJA STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PENDING MOTIONS [ECF 166] [ECF 167] AND [ECF 168] Defendants. Plaintiff, METROPCS a brand of T-MOBILE USA, INC., a Delaware Corporation (“METROPCS”), and Defendants, AMIR QURESHI a/k/a AMIER QURESHI, a/k/a AMIER I. QURESHI, a/k/a AMIER F. QURESHI, SR.; ASIM QURESHI a/k/a ALEX QURESHI; a/k/a AZIM QURESHI, a/k/a AZIM DeDREAM; and SEHER QURESHI (“Defendants”) (hereinafter 28 Page 1 of 3 Case 2:15-cv-01412-JAD-DJA Document 170 Filed 10/30/19 Page 2 of 3 1 collectively referred to as the “Parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel, and pursuant 2 to Local Rule IA 6-1 and 6-2, hereby jointly stipulate to an extension up to and including 3 November 15, 2019 for Plaintiff to file their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, in Part, 4 Plaintiff’s Complaint [ECF No. 166]; an extension up to and including November 20, 2019 for 5 Defendants to file their Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendants to Produce 6 Electronic Discovery and for Sanctions and Memorandum of Law [ECF No. 167]; and an extension 7 up to and including November 20, 2019 for Defendants to file their Opposition to Plaintiff’s 8 Motion for Leave to File Documents Under Seal [ECF No. 168] and states as follows: 9 1. On October 18, 2019, Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss, in Part, Plaintiff’s THE WRIGHT LAW GROUP P.C. 2340 Paseo Del Prado, Suite D-305 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 Tel: (702) 405-0001 Fax: (702) 405-8454 10 Complaint [ECF 166]. Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is currently due 11 November 1, 2019. 12 2. On October 23, 2019, Plaintiff filed its Motion to Compel Defendants to Produce 13 Electronic Discovery and for Sanctions and Incorporated Memorandum of Law [ECF 167]. 14 Defendants’ response is currently due by November 6, 2019. 15 16 17 3. On October 23, 2019, Plaintiff filed its Motion for Leave to File Documents Under Seal [ECF 168]. Defendants’ response is currently due by November 6, 2019. 4. The Parties have conferred and agree to allow the Plaintiff up to and including 18 November 15, 2019 to file their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, in Part, Plaintiff’s 19 Complaint [ECF 166]. The Parties further agree to allow Defendants up to and including November 20 20, 2019 to file both their Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendants to Produce 21 Electronic Discovery and for Sanctions and Incorporated Memorandum of Law and their 22 Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Documents Under Seal. 23 5. This is the first stipulation for an extension of time to file said documents. 24 6. This extension is requested because the Parties are actively involved in settlement 25 26 27 discussion. 7. This extension is sought in good faith, and is not intended for purposes of delay nor prejudice towards any party. 28 Page 2 of 3 Case 2:15-cv-01412-JAD-DJA Document 170 Filed 10/30/19 Page 3 of 3 1 WHEREFORE, the Parties respectfully request that the Court enter this order extending: 2 Plaintiff’s deadline to file their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, in Part, Plaintiff’s 3 Complaint [ECF 166] from November 1, 2019 to November 15, 2019; Defendants’ deadline to file 4 their Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendants to Produce Electronic Discovery and 5 for Sanctions and Incorporated Memorandum of Law [ECF 167] from November 6, 2019 to 6 November 20, 2019; and Defendant’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File 7 Documents Under Seal [ECF 168] from November 6, 2019 to November 20, 2019 and provide 8 such other relief as is just and proper. 9 THE WRIGHT LAW GROUP P.C. 2340 Paseo Del Prado, Suite D-305 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 Tel: (702) 405-0001 Fax: (702) 405-8454 10 11 12 13 14 15 Respectfully submitted this 30th day of October, 2019. SNELL & WILMER, LLP THE WRIGHT LAW GROUP, P.C. /s/ Richard C. Gordon RICHARD C. GORDON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9036 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Phone: (702) 784-5200 Facsimile: (702) 784-5252 Attorneys for Plaintiffs /s/ Amy J. Smith AMY J. SMITH, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 14954 2340 Paseo Deal Prado, Suite D-305 Las Vegas, Nevada 89102 Phone: (702) 405-0001 Facsimile: (702) 405-8454 Attorneys for Defendants 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED: 18 19 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 20 21 DATED: October 31, 2019 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?