Metro PCS v. A2Z Connection, LLC et al
Filing
171
ORDER granting 170 Stipulation; Re: 166 Motion to Dismiss, 168 Motion to Seal, 167 Motion to Compel. Responses for 166 Motion due by 11/15/2019. Responses for 167 , 168 Motions due by 11/20/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 10/31/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
Case 2:15-cv-01412-JAD-DJA Document 170 Filed 10/30/19 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
THE WRIGHT LAW GROUP P.C.
2340 Paseo Del Prado, Suite D-305
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
Tel: (702) 405-0001 Fax: (702) 405-8454
10
11
JOHN HENRY WRIGHT, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 6182
CHRISTOPHER B. PHILLIPS, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 14600
AMY J. SMITH, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 14954
THE WRIGHT LAW GROUP, P.C.
2340 Paseo Del Prado, Suite D-305
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
Telephone: (702) 405-0001
Facsimile: (702) 405-8454
Email: john@wrightlawgroupnv.com
chris@wrightlawgroupnv.com
amys@wrightlawgroupnv.com
Attorneys for Defendants
AMIR QURESHI a/k/a AMIER QURESHI, a/k/a
AMIER I. QURESHI, a/k/a AMIER F.
QURESHI, SR.; ASIM QURESHI a/k/a
ALEX QURESHI, a/k/a AZIM QURESHI
a/k/a AZIM DeDREAM, and SEHER
QURESHI
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
14
15
METROPCS, a brand of T-MOBILE USA,
INC., a Delaware Corporation,
Plaintiff,
16
17
vs.
18
A2Z CONNECTION, LLC, a Nevada
limited liability corporation; A2Z LLC, a
Nevada limited liability corporation; AMIR
QURESHI a/k/a AMIER QURESHI, a/k/a
AMIER I. QURESHI, a/k/a AMIER F.
QURESHI, SR.; ASIM QURESHI a/k/a
ALEX QURESHI, a/k/a AZIM QURESHI
a/k/a AZIM DeDREAM, and SEHER
QURESHI,
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Case No. 2:15-cv-01412-JAD-DJA
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON PENDING MOTIONS
[ECF 166] [ECF 167] AND [ECF 168]
Defendants.
Plaintiff, METROPCS a brand of T-MOBILE USA, INC., a Delaware Corporation
(“METROPCS”), and Defendants, AMIR QURESHI a/k/a AMIER QURESHI, a/k/a AMIER I.
QURESHI, a/k/a AMIER F. QURESHI, SR.; ASIM QURESHI a/k/a ALEX QURESHI; a/k/a
AZIM QURESHI, a/k/a AZIM DeDREAM; and SEHER QURESHI (“Defendants”) (hereinafter
28
Page 1 of 3
Case 2:15-cv-01412-JAD-DJA Document 170 Filed 10/30/19 Page 2 of 3
1
collectively referred to as the “Parties”), by and through their undersigned counsel, and pursuant
2
to Local Rule IA 6-1 and 6-2, hereby jointly stipulate to an extension up to and including
3
November 15, 2019 for Plaintiff to file their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, in Part,
4
Plaintiff’s Complaint [ECF No. 166]; an extension up to and including November 20, 2019 for
5
Defendants to file their Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendants to Produce
6
Electronic Discovery and for Sanctions and Memorandum of Law [ECF No. 167]; and an extension
7
up to and including November 20, 2019 for Defendants to file their Opposition to Plaintiff’s
8
Motion for Leave to File Documents Under Seal [ECF No. 168] and states as follows:
9
1.
On October 18, 2019, Defendants filed their Motion to Dismiss, in Part, Plaintiff’s
THE WRIGHT LAW GROUP P.C.
2340 Paseo Del Prado, Suite D-305
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
Tel: (702) 405-0001 Fax: (702) 405-8454
10
Complaint [ECF 166]. Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is currently due
11
November 1, 2019.
12
2.
On October 23, 2019, Plaintiff filed its Motion to Compel Defendants to Produce
13
Electronic Discovery and for Sanctions and Incorporated Memorandum of Law [ECF 167].
14
Defendants’ response is currently due by November 6, 2019.
15
16
17
3.
On October 23, 2019, Plaintiff filed its Motion for Leave to File Documents Under
Seal [ECF 168]. Defendants’ response is currently due by November 6, 2019.
4.
The Parties have conferred and agree to allow the Plaintiff up to and including
18
November 15, 2019 to file their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, in Part, Plaintiff’s
19
Complaint [ECF 166]. The Parties further agree to allow Defendants up to and including November
20
20, 2019 to file both their Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendants to Produce
21
Electronic Discovery and for Sanctions and Incorporated Memorandum of Law and their
22
Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Documents Under Seal.
23
5.
This is the first stipulation for an extension of time to file said documents.
24
6.
This extension is requested because the Parties are actively involved in settlement
25
26
27
discussion.
7.
This extension is sought in good faith, and is not intended for purposes of delay nor
prejudice towards any party.
28
Page 2 of 3
Case 2:15-cv-01412-JAD-DJA Document 170 Filed 10/30/19 Page 3 of 3
1
WHEREFORE, the Parties respectfully request that the Court enter this order extending:
2
Plaintiff’s deadline to file their Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, in Part, Plaintiff’s
3
Complaint [ECF 166] from November 1, 2019 to November 15, 2019; Defendants’ deadline to file
4
their Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendants to Produce Electronic Discovery and
5
for Sanctions and Incorporated Memorandum of Law [ECF 167] from November 6, 2019 to
6
November 20, 2019; and Defendant’s Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File
7
Documents Under Seal [ECF 168] from November 6, 2019 to November 20, 2019 and provide
8
such other relief as is just and proper.
9
THE WRIGHT LAW GROUP P.C.
2340 Paseo Del Prado, Suite D-305
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
Tel: (702) 405-0001 Fax: (702) 405-8454
10
11
12
13
14
15
Respectfully submitted this 30th day of October, 2019.
SNELL & WILMER, LLP
THE WRIGHT LAW GROUP, P.C.
/s/ Richard C. Gordon
RICHARD C. GORDON, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 9036
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Phone: (702) 784-5200
Facsimile: (702) 784-5252
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
/s/ Amy J. Smith
AMY J. SMITH, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 14954
2340 Paseo Deal Prado, Suite D-305
Las Vegas, Nevada 89102
Phone: (702) 405-0001
Facsimile: (702) 405-8454
Attorneys for Defendants
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED:
18
19
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
20
21
DATED: October 31, 2019
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 3 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?