Wilk v. Neven et al
ORDER that the Clerk terminate Plaintiff's 62 Motion for Production of Documents and note on the docket that is was a misfiled document. The Court will not consider it as a motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 5/18/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
DWIGHT NEVEN, et al,
Case No. 2:15-cv-01429-JCM-CWH
Upon review of the docket, Plaintiff's filing labeled “motion for production of documents”
(ECF No. 62) is a duplicate of previous filings. Page one of this filing appears to be a photocopy of
the first page of Plaintiff's previous motion for production of documents (ECF No. 56). Page two of
this filing appears to be a photocopy of the second page of Plaintiff’s renewed motion for summary
judgment (ECF No. 57). As the instant filing appears to have been filed mistakenly, the Court will
not consider it as a motion.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Clerk terminate ECF No. 62, and note on the docket
that it was a misfiled document.
DATED: May 18, 2017.
C.W. Hoffman, Jr.
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?