Wilk v. Neven et al

Filing 66

ORDER that the Clerk terminate Plaintiff's 62 Motion for Production of Documents and note on the docket that is was a misfiled document. The Court will not consider it as a motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 5/18/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ROBERT WILK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) DWIGHT NEVEN, et al, ) ) Defendants. ) ) _______________________________________ ) Case No. 2:15-cv-01429-JCM-CWH ORDER Upon review of the docket, Plaintiff's filing labeled “motion for production of documents” 11 (ECF No. 62) is a duplicate of previous filings. Page one of this filing appears to be a photocopy of 12 the first page of Plaintiff's previous motion for production of documents (ECF No. 56). Page two of 13 this filing appears to be a photocopy of the second page of Plaintiff’s renewed motion for summary 14 judgment (ECF No. 57). As the instant filing appears to have been filed mistakenly, the Court will 15 not consider it as a motion. 16 17 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Clerk terminate ECF No. 62, and note on the docket that it was a misfiled document. 18 19 DATED: May 18, 2017. 20 21 _________________________________ C.W. Hoffman, Jr. United States Magistrate Judge 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?