U.S. Bank, National Association vs Countryside Homeowners Association, et al

Filing 63

FINAL JUDGMENT per ECF No. 58 Proposed Order. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 5/22/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
Case 2:15-cv-01463-RCJ-GWF Document 58 Filed 04/27/17 Page 1 of 3 1 6 ARIEL E. STERN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8276 VATANA LAY, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12993 AKERMAN LLP 1160 Town Center Drive, Suite 330 Las Vegas, Nevada 89144 Telephone: (702) 634-5000 Facsimile: (702) 380-8572 Email: ariel.stern@akerman.com vatana.lay@akerman.com 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff 2 3 4 5 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 AKERMAN LLP 1160 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 330 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89144 TEL.: (702) 634-5000 – FAX: (702) 380-8572 11 12 13 14 U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE HOLDERS OF THE CSFB MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP., ADJUSTABLE RATE MORTGAGE TRUST 2005-8, ADJUSTABLE RATE MORTGAGE– BACKED PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-8, Case No.: 2:15-cv-01463-RCJ-GWF [PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT Plaintiff, 15 16 vs. 17 COUNTRYSIDE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION; K K REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT FUND, LLC; DOE INDIVIDUALS I-X, inclusive, and ROE CORPORATIONS I-X, inclusive, 18 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 Pursuant to the Court's order dated April 13, 2017 [ECF. No. 57], the Court hereby enters final judgment in this case as follows: 1. This action concerns the real property commonly known as 8543 Ebony Hills Way, Las Vegas, NV 89123, APN 177-15-711-001, more specifically described as: Parcel ONE (1): 26 27 Lot ONE (1) in Block One (1) of Maryland / Pebble – Unit 3 as shown by map thereof on file in Book 69 of plats, Page 49 in the office of the County Recorder of Clark County, Nevada. 28 {41603760;1} APN 177-15-711-0011 Case 2:15-cv-01463-RCJ-GWF Document 58 Filed 04/27/17 Page 2 of 3 1 PARCEL TWO (2): 2 5 A non-exclusive easement appurtenant to Parcel One (1) for ingress, egress and of use and enjoyment in, to and over the Common Areas as set forth in the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions and Reservation of Easements for Countryside recorded August 4, 1995 in Book 950804 as Document No. 00005 and re-recorded September 14, 1995 in Book 950914 as Document No. 00117, as the same may from time to time be amended and/or supplemented in the Office of the County Recorder of Clark County, Nevada 6 APN: 177-15-711-001 7 2. Plaintiff, U.S. Bank, National Association, as Trustee for the Holders of the CSFB Mortgage 8 Securities Corp., Adjustable Rate Mortgage Trust 2005-8, Adjustable Rate Mortgage-Backed Pass- 9 Through Certificates Series 2005-8 (U.S. Bank) is the beneficiary of a senior deed of trust (the Deed 10 of Trust) recorded against the real property at issue in this case on May 18, 2005 as Instrument No. 11 20050518-0001381, which secures a loan in the original amount of $228,800. 3 AKERMAN LLP 1160 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 330 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89144 TEL.: (702) 634-5000 – FAX: (702) 380-8572 4 12 3. Countryside Homeowners' Association (the HOA) foreclosed on the property on or about 13 January 6, 2012. A foreclosure deed in favor of HOA was recorded January 19, 2012 as Instrument 14 No. 201201190001522. 15 16 17 4. KK Real Estate Investment Fund, LLC (KKREIF) acquired the property from HOA via a QuitClaim Deed recorded on May 7, 2013 as Instrument No. 201305070003355 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 18 1. The Court has granted summary judgment in U.S. Bank's favor as to its first cause of action 19 for quiet title and declaratory judgment. Specifically, the Court finds that Chapter 116’s opt-in notice 20 scheme is facially unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, as 21 foreclosure under NRS 116 involves state action that deprives a right without adequate notice. See 22 Bourne Valley Court Tr. V. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 832 F.3d 1154, 1160 (9th Cir. 2016). The Court 23 further finds that defendants provided no evidence of actual notice in this case. 24 foreclosure sale did not extinguish the Deed of Trust held by U.S. Bank. As a result, the title 25 acquired by the HOA at the foreclosure sale, and the title it subsequently conveyed to KKREIF, is 26 subject to the Deed of Trust. 27 28 {41603760;1} APN 177-15-711-0012 The HOA's Case 2:15-cv-01463-RCJ-GWF Document 58 Filed 04/27/17 Page 3 of 3 1 2 2. The Deed of Trust remains a valid superior lien against the property and is superior to the interest held by KKREIF; 3 3. As to the remaining claims — Breach of NRS 116.1113 (Second Cause of Action); Wrongful 4 Foreclosure against Countrywide Homeowners' Association (Third Cause of Action); and Injunctive 5 Relief against KKREIF (Fourth Cause of Action) — these claims are dismissed without prejudice. 6 Accordingly, all claims in this case are resolved. 7 8 4. This is the final judgment of the Court, and no further order is required. Each side will bear its own fees and costs. DATED: This 22nd day ___, 2017 DATED: _________ of May, 2017. 9 10 AKERMAN LLP 1160 TOWN CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 330 LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89144 TEL.: (702) 634-5000 – FAX: (702) 380-8572 11 ____________________________________ 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Respectfully submitted by: AKERMAN LLP /s/ Vatana Lay ARIEL E. STERN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8276 VATANA LAY, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12993 1160 Town Center Drive, Suite 330 Las Vegas, Nevada 89144 Attorneys for Plaintiff MAIER GUTIERREZ AYON LIPSON NEILSON COLE SELTZER & GARIN P.C. /s/ Luis Ayon______________________ LUIS AYON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 9752 8816 Spanish Ridge Avenue Las Vegas, Nevada 89148 Attorneys for Defendant KK Real Estate Investment Fund, LLC /s/ David Ochoa___________________ JOSEPH GARIN, ESQ . Nevada Bar No. 6653 KALEB D. ANDERSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 7582 DAVID OCHOA, ESQ, Nevada Bar No. 10414 9900 Covington Cross Drive, Suite 120 Las Vegas, Nevada 89144 Attorneys for Defendant Countryside Homeowners Association 28 {41603760;1} APN 177-15-711-0013

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?