Wallace v. Romey et al
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 13 , 14 Plaintiff's Motions to Refile and 15 , 16 Motions for Issuance of Subpoenas are denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 4/13/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
CLAUDIA ROMNEY, et al.,
Case No. 2:15-cv-01474-RFB-GWF
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motions to Refile (ECF Nos. 13 and 14) and
Motions for Issuance of Subpoenas (ECF Nos. 15 and 16), filed on December 13, 2016.
The Court is unclear what relief Plaintiff seeks in his motions and will deny them on that
basis. Plaintiff’s motions to refile appear to request that Plaintiff be allowed to amend his
complaint. If so, Plaintiff is advised that he must file a proper motion to amend pursuant to Rule 15
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.1 Plaintiff’s motions for subpoenas on the other hand are
entirely unintelligible. Plaintiff is advised that he may refile his motions for subpoena, but if he
chooses to do so he must state with sufficient clarity what relief he seeks and the reason for his
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motions to Refile (ECF Nos. 13 and 14) and
Motions for Issuance of Subpoenas (ECF Nos. 15 and 16) are denied.
DATED this 13th day of April, 2017.
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
The Court also notes that Plaintiff was given 45 days from March 21, 2017 in which to file an amended complaint
against Defendants Fasulo and Dillard that complied with the Court’s order. See Order (ECF No. 21). Plaintiff has not yet
filed an amended complaint.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?