Wallace v. Romey et al
Filing
22
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 13 , 14 Plaintiff's Motions to Refile and 15 , 16 Motions for Issuance of Subpoenas are denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 4/13/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
GARY WALLACE,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
)
CLAUDIA ROMNEY, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
12
13
Case No. 2:15-cv-01474-RFB-GWF
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motions to Refile (ECF Nos. 13 and 14) and
Motions for Issuance of Subpoenas (ECF Nos. 15 and 16), filed on December 13, 2016.
14
The Court is unclear what relief Plaintiff seeks in his motions and will deny them on that
15
basis. Plaintiff’s motions to refile appear to request that Plaintiff be allowed to amend his
16
complaint. If so, Plaintiff is advised that he must file a proper motion to amend pursuant to Rule 15
17
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.1 Plaintiff’s motions for subpoenas on the other hand are
18
entirely unintelligible. Plaintiff is advised that he may refile his motions for subpoena, but if he
19
chooses to do so he must state with sufficient clarity what relief he seeks and the reason for his
20
requests. Accordingly,
21
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motions to Refile (ECF Nos. 13 and 14) and
Motions for Issuance of Subpoenas (ECF Nos. 15 and 16) are denied.
23
DATED this 13th day of April, 2017.
24
25
______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge
26
27
28
1
The Court also notes that Plaintiff was given 45 days from March 21, 2017 in which to file an amended complaint
against Defendants Fasulo and Dillard that complied with the Court’s order. See Order (ECF No. 21). Plaintiff has not yet
filed an amended complaint.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?