Tello v. MortgageIt, Inc. et al

Filing 47

ORDER Granting 41 Motion to Strike re 37 Notice of Filing of Proposed Orders. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 11/13/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 MARIO P. TELLO, 8 9 10 11 12 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) MORTGAGEIT, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) 13 Case No.: 2:15-cv-01490-GMN-GWF ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Strike (#41), filed on November 6, 14 2015. Plaintiff filed a Response (#42) on November 7, 2015. Defendants Bank of New York 15 Mellon, Mortgage Electronic Systems, Inc., and Select Portfolio Servicing filed a Joinder (#44) to 16 the Motion to Strike on November 9, 2015. Defendant Equity Title, LLC, filed a Joinder (#45) to 17 the Motion to Strike on November 9, 2015. 18 Defendant moves to strike Plaintiff’s Notice of Proposed Orders (#37), filed on October 14, 19 2015. Plaintiff submitted four proposed orders for the Court’s consideration. Defendant objects to 20 the proposed orders as immaterial and impertinent. Plaintiff argues that the Court might simply 21 ignore the proposed orders if it wished to do so. The Court finds that the proposed orders were 22 unnecessary, as the Court has not yet heard or decided any of the motions for which the proposed 23 orders were submitted. Defendant has sufficiently established good cause for striking the proposed 24 orders. Accordingly, 25 ... 26 ... 27 ... 28 ... 1 2 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Strike (#41) is granted. Plaintiff’s Notice of Filing of Proposed Orders (#37) is hereby stricken. DATED this 13th day of November, 2015. 4 5 6 GEORGE FOLEY, JR. United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?