Rand v. Patsalos-Fox et al
Filing
22
ORDER Granting 21 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 12/4/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
1
2
3
4
5
Marquis Aurbach Coffing
Erik W. Fox, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8804
10001 Park Run Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Telephone: (702) 382-0711
Facsimile: (702) 382-5816
efox@maclaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
NAHUM RAND,
Plaintiff,
9
11
12
10001 Park Run Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
(702) 382-0711 FAX: (702) 382-5816
MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING
10
13
14
Case No.:
2:15-cv-01510-RFB-GWF
vs.
MICHAEL PATSALOS-FOX; PAUL
BARTLETT; MICHAEL PATTERSON; TIM
CONNOR; RHO VENTURES; VEDANTA
CAPITAL LP; SEQUEL VENTURE
PARTNERS; INFONOW CORPORATION dba
CHANNELINSIGHT; DOES I through X,
inclusive; and ROE CORPORATIONS I through
X, inclusive,
NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH
PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FED. R.
CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i)
15
16
Defendants.
17
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff Nahum Rand, through his
18
undersigned counsel of record, hereby dismisses the above-captioned case with prejudice, with
19
each party to bears its own attorney fees and costs.
20
Dated this 20th day of November, 2015.
21
MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING
22
23
By
24
25
26
/s/ Erik W. Fox
Erik W. Fox, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8804
10001 Park Run Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Attorney for Plaintiff
27
28
Page 1 of 2
MAC:13943-001 2661502_2 11/20/2015 1:14 PM
1
2
3
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the above-captioned case
be dismissed with prejudice on the ____ day of _______________, 2015.
4th
December
4
5
6
7
__________________________
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
United States District Judge
8
9
11
12
10001 Park Run Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
(702) 382-0711 FAX: (702) 382-5816
MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING
10
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 2
MAC:13943-001 2661502_2 11/20/2015 1:14 PM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?