Rand v. Patsalos-Fox et al

Filing 22

ORDER Granting 21 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 12/4/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Marquis Aurbach Coffing Erik W. Fox, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8804 10001 Park Run Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Telephone: (702) 382-0711 Facsimile: (702) 382-5816 efox@maclaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 NAHUM RAND, Plaintiff, 9 11 12 10001 Park Run Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 (702) 382-0711 FAX: (702) 382-5816 MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING 10 13 14 Case No.: 2:15-cv-01510-RFB-GWF vs. MICHAEL PATSALOS-FOX; PAUL BARTLETT; MICHAEL PATTERSON; TIM CONNOR; RHO VENTURES; VEDANTA CAPITAL LP; SEQUEL VENTURE PARTNERS; INFONOW CORPORATION dba CHANNELINSIGHT; DOES I through X, inclusive; and ROE CORPORATIONS I through X, inclusive, NOTICE OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) 15 16 Defendants. 17 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Plaintiff Nahum Rand, through his 18 undersigned counsel of record, hereby dismisses the above-captioned case with prejudice, with 19 each party to bears its own attorney fees and costs. 20 Dated this 20th day of November, 2015. 21 MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING 22 23 By 24 25 26 /s/ Erik W. Fox Erik W. Fox, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8804 10001 Park Run Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 Attorney for Plaintiff 27 28 Page 1 of 2 MAC:13943-001 2661502_2 11/20/2015 1:14 PM 1 2 3 ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the above-captioned case be dismissed with prejudice on the ____ day of _______________, 2015. 4th December 4 5 6 7 __________________________ U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II United States District Judge 8 9 11 12 10001 Park Run Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89145 (702) 382-0711 FAX: (702) 382-5816 MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING 10 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 of 2 MAC:13943-001 2661502_2 11/20/2015 1:14 PM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?