Rand v. Patsalos-Fox et al

Filing 9

ORDER Granting 7 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to 1 Complaint. Paul Bartlet, Michael Patsalos-Fox, Michael Patterson, and Vedanta Capital LP answer due 9/9/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 8/24/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)

Case 2:15-cv-01510-RFB-GWF Document 7 Filed 08/20/15 Page 1 of 4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

JEFFREY A. SMITH, ESQ.
Colorado Bar No. 31038
Motion for Permission to Practice
Pro Hac Vice and Designation of
Local Counsel Pursuant to
LR IA 10-2 Pending
SMITH BYERS LLC
5480 Valmont Rd., Suite #200
Boulder, Colorado 80301
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]
ADAM H. SPRINGEL, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 7187
MICHAEL A. ARATA, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 11902
SPRINGEL & FINK LLP
10655 Park Run Drive, Suite 275
Las Vegas, Nevada 89144
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
INFONOW CORPORATION dba
CHANNELINSIGHT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
NAHUM RAND,
Case No.: 2:15-cv-01510-RFB-GWF
Plaintiff,
vs.

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS MICHAEL PATSALOSFOX, MICHAEL PATTERSON,
VEDANTA CAPITAL, LP AND PAUL
BARTLETT TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT [1-1]

MICHAEL PATSALOS-FOX; PAUL
BARTLETT; MICHAEL PATTERSON; TIM
CONNOR; RHO VENTURES; VEDANTA
CAPITAL LP; SEQUEL VENTURE
PARTNERS; INFONOW CORPORATION dba
CHANNELINSIGHT; DOES I through X,
(First Request)
inclusive; and ROE CORPORATIONS I
through X, inclusive,
Defendants.

28

{N0146383;1}

-1-

Case 2:15-cv-01510-RFB-GWF Document 7 Filed 08/20/15 Page 2 of 4

1

Defendant INFONOW CORPORATION dba CHANNELINSIGHT (“InfoNow”) and

2

Plaintiff NAHUM RAND, by and through their counsel of records, hereby stipulate to allow

3

Defendants Michael Patsalos-Fox, Michael Patterson, Vedanta Capital, LP and Paul Bartlett

4

(collectively, “Defendants”) an extension of time to file their responses to Plaintiff’s First

5

Amended Complaint. In furtherance of the Stipulation, Defendants state as follows:

6

1.

7

25, 2015.

8

2.

9
10

Defendants’ response to the First Amended Complaint is due on Tuesday, August

Due to the press of business of Defendants’ lead counsel and other pre-existing

obligations, Defendants require an additional 15 days, up to and including September 9, 2015 in
which to file their response to the First Amended Complaint.
3.

11

Additionally, because Defendants believe there are threshold personal

12

jurisdictional questions raised by the First Amended Complaint, counsel for the parties are

13

discussing ways to resolve jurisdictional concerns and avoid burdening the Court with

14

unnecessary motions.

15

discussions.

However, the parties need additional time to work through these

16

4.

Plaintiff’s counsel, Erik W. Fox, has stipulated to the requested extension of time.

17

5.

This is the first extension of time sought by Defendants.

18

6.

The requested extension will not prejudice the parties, especially since not all

19

defendants have been served, nor will the requested extension prejudice the Court.

20

///

21

///

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

{N0146383;1}

-2-

Case 2:15-cv-01510-RFB-GWF Document 7 Filed 08/20/15 Page 3 of 4

1

WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, InfoNow and Plaintiff respectfully requests

2

that the Court accept this Stipulation and extend the time for Defendants to respond to the First

3

Amended Complaint to September 9, 2015.

4

DATED this 20th day of August, 2015.

5
/s/ Jeffrey A. Smith
JEFFREY A. SMITH, ESQ.
Colorado Bar No. 31038
Motion for Permission to
Practice
Pro Hac Vice and Designation of
Local Counsel Pursuant to
LR IA 10-2 Pending
SMITH BYERS LLC
5480 Valmont Rd., Suite #200
Boulder, Colorado 80301
Telephone: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Attorney for Defendant
INFONOW CORPORATION dba
CHANNELINSIGHT

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

/s/ Adam H. Springel
ADAM H. SPRINGEL, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 7187
MICHAEL A. ARATA, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 11902
SPRINGEL & FINK LLP
10655 Park Run Drive, Ste. 275
Las Vegas, Nevada 89144
Telephone: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant INFONOW
CORPORATION dba
CHANNELINSIGHT

/s/ Erik W. Fox
ERIK W. FOX, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 8804
MARQUIS AURBACH
COFFING
10001 Park Run Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89145
Telephone: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff

17
18
19
20
21
22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24

August 24, 2015
Dated:__________________

25
26
____________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
United States Magistrate Judge

27
28

{N0146383;1}

-3-

Case 2:15-cv-01510-RFB-GWF Document 7 Filed 08/20/15 Page 4 of 4

1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

2

Pursuant to Local Rule 5 of this Court, I certify that I am an employee of Springel & Fink

3

LLP and that on this 20th day of August, 2015, I caused a correct copy of the foregoing

4

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS MICHAEL PATSALOS-FOX,

5

MICHAEL PATTERSON, VEDANTA CAPITAL, LP AND PAUL BARTLETT TO

6

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [1-1] (First Request) to

7

be served via CM/ECF to:

8
9
10
11
12

Erik W. Fox, Esq.
[e-mail]
MARQUIS AURBACH COFFING
10001 Park Run Drive
Las Vegas, NV 89145
Telephone [phone]
Facsimile [phone]
Attorney for Plaintiff

13
/s/ Erin L. Wood
An employee of Springel & Fink LLP

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

{N0146383;1}

-4-