United States of America v Joshua D. Flushman, et al

Filing 18

ORDER that 17 the parties' joint proposed discovery plan (mislabeled as a Case Management Report) is DENIED without prejudice. The parties shall file a new joint proposed discovery plan that complies in full with Local Rule 26-1 no later than March 10, 2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/9/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
11
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
JOSHUA D. FLUSHMAN, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:15-cv-01531-JAD-NJK
ORDER
(Docket No. 17)

16

Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint proposed discovery plan (which the parties

17

mislabeled as a Case Management Report). Docket No. 17. If a proposed discovery plan sets deadlines

18

longer than those specified in Local Rule 26-1(e), then the plan must provide a statement of reasons why

19

longer periods should apply in that case. Local Rule 26-1(d). Here, the parties’ proposed discovery

20

plan sets deadlines outside the periods specified in Local Rule 26-1(e), but fails to provide a statement

21

of reasons explaining why longer time periods are warranted.

22

Accordingly, the proposed discovery plan is hereby DENIED without prejudice. The parties

23

shall file a new joint proposed discovery plan that complies in full with Local Rule 26-1 no later than

24

March 10, 2016.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

DATED: March 9, 2016.

27
28

______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge