Perez et al v. Cox et al
Filing
187
ORDER Granting 184 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request) re 146 Motion for Summary Judgment, 147 Motion for Summary Judgment, 153 Motion for Summary Judgment, 159 Motion for Summary Judgment. Replies due by 2/18/2022. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/1/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW)
Case 2:15-cv-01572-APG-DJA Document 187 Filed 02/01/22 Page 1 of 4
1 ROBERT W. FREEMAN
Nevada Bar No. 3062
2 robert.freeman@lewisbrisbois.com
E. MATTHEW FREEMAN
3 Nevada Bar No. 14198
matt.freeman@lewisbrisbois.com
4 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP
6385 S. Rainbow Boulevard, Suite 600
5 Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
702.893.3383
6 FAX: 702.893.3789
Attorneys for Defendant
7
Corrections Officer Trainee
Raynaldo-John Ramos
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
***
11
VICTOR PEREZ, as Special Administrator of
CASE NO. 2:15-cv-1572-APG-DJA
12 the Estate of CARLOS PEREZ, deceased;
VICTOR PEREZ, as the Guardian Ad Litem
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
13 for S.E.P, a minor; VICTOR PEREZ, as the
EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR THE
Guardian Ad Litem for A.I.P., a minor;
DEFENDANTS TO FILE THEIR
14
REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONS
Plaintiff,
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkts. 146,
15
147, 153 and 159)
vs.
16
FIRST REQUEST
STATE OF NEVADA, ex. rel. NEVADA
17 DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;
DIRECTOR GREG COX, individually;
18 WARDEN DWIGHT NEVEN, individually;
ASSISTANT WARDER TIMOTHY FILSON,
19 individually; COT RAMOS, individually;
LIEUTENANT OLIVER, individually;
20 CORRECTIONS OFFICER CASTRO,
individually; CORRECTIONS OFFICER
21 SMITH, individually; and DOES I-X,
inclusive; and ROES I-X, inclusive;
22
Defendants.
23
24
Pursuant to IA 6-1 and LR 26-3, Plaintiff, Victor Perez, as Special Administrator of the
25 Estate of Carlos Perez, deceased; Victor Perez, as Guardian Ad Litem for S.E.P., a minor; Victor
26 Perez, as Guardian Ad Litem for A.I.P., a minor, Defendants State of Nevada ex. rel. Nevada
27 Department of Corrections, Director Greg Cox, Warden Dwight Neven, Assistant Warden
LEWIS
28 Timothy Filson, COT Ramos, Lieutenant Oliver, Corrections Officer Castro, and Corrections
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
4837-9960-0126.2
Case 2:15-cv-01572-APG-DJA Document 187 Filed 02/01/22 Page 2 of 4
1 Officer Smith, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to extend the
2 deadline to file their Replies in Support of Motions for Summary Judgment in the above-captioned
3 case by fourteen (14) days, up to and including February 18, 2022.
4
The motions governed by this Stipulation and Proposed Order are as follows:
5
Defendant Corrections Officer Castro’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt 146],
6
Defendant Raynaldo-John Ramos’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt 147],
7
State of Nevada Ex Rel. Nevada Department of Corrections, James “Greg” Cox, Timothy
8
Filson, Dwight Neven and Ronald Olivers’ Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt 153]
9
Defendant Isaiah Smith’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt 159]
10
Counsel for the plaintiffs have no objection to extending the deadlines for defendants to
11 file replies.
12
Over the past weeks counsel for Defendant Ramos has been occupied in preparing for trials
13 in:
Latham v. City of Henderson – A-19-790017-C,
14 1671-KJD-EJY,
Barrese v. LVMPD, et al. – 2:18-cv-
Crystal Choi v. SFMAIC, et al. -A-20-819428-C,
15 USAA – A-19-800593-C,
James
Jackson
Counsel has also been preparing a Motion for Summary Judgment in
16 Gregory v. City of North Las Vegas, et al. – 2:20-cv-1439-APG.
17
This request for extension is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.
18 …
19 …
20 …
21 …
22 …
23 …
24 …
25 …
26 …
27 …
LEWIS
28 …
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
4837-9960-0126.2
v.
2
Case 2:15-cv-01572-APG-DJA Document 187 Filed 02/01/22 Page 3 of 4
1
2
WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that this Court extend the time for the
3 parties to file their Replies in Support of Motions for Summary Judgment by fourteen (14) days
4 from the current deadline of February 4, 2022 up to and including February 18, 2022.
5
DATED this 31st day of January, 2022.
DATED this 31st day of January, 2022.
6
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH
CLARK HILL PLLC
/s/ Robert W. Freeman
ROBERT W. FREEMAN
Nevada Bar No. 3062
E. MATTHEW FREEMAN
Nevada Bar No. 14198
6385 S. Rainbow Blvd, Suite 600
Las Vegas, Nevada 89118
Attorneys for the Defendant
Corrections Officer Trainee
Raynaldo-John Ramos
/s / Paola M. Armeni
PAOLA M. ARMENI
Nevada Bar No. 8357
GIA N. MARINA
Nevada Bar No. 15276
3800 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 500
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Attorneys for Plaintiff
DATED this 31st day of January, 2022.
DATED this 31st day of January, 2022.
AARON D. FORD
ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP
/s / Akke Levin
STEVEN G. SHEVORSKI
Nevada Bar No. 8256
AKKE LEVIN
Nevada Bar No. 9102
KIEL B. IRELAND
Nevada Bar No. 15368C
100 N. Carson Street
Carson City, Nevada 89701
Attorneys for Defendants
State of Nevada, ex. rel. Nevada Department
of Corrections, Director James Greg Cox,
Warden, Dwight Neven, Assistant Warden
Timothy Filson, and Lieutenant Ronald
Oliver
/s / Alina M. Shell
JEFFREY F. BARR
Nevada Bar No. 7269
ALINA M. SHELL
Nevada Bar No. 11711
3770 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 200
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Attorneys for Defendant
Corrections Officer Isaiah Smith
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
LEWIS
28
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
4837-9960-0126.2
3
Case 2:15-cv-01572-APG-DJA Document 187 Filed 02/01/22 Page 4 of 4
1
DATED this 31st day of January, 2022.
2
MARQUIS AURBACH & COFFING
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
/s / Craig R. Anderson
CRAIG R. ANDERSON
Nevada Bar No. 06822
JACQUELINE V. NICHOLS
Nevada Bar No. 14246
10001 Park Run Drive
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Attorneys for Defendant
Corrections Officer Castro
ORDER
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
Dated this ___ day of ______________, 2022.
1st
February
13
14
______________________________________
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
LEWIS
28
BRISBOIS
BISGAARD
& SMITH LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
4837-9960-0126.2
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?