Davis v. Neven et al
Filing
45
ORDER Granting Respondents' 44 Second Motion to Extend Time Re: 29 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Answer or Response due by 3/19/2018. Petitioner's 41 Motion to Extend Prison Copywork Limit is Denied. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 2/20/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - copy mailed to Petitioner - SLD)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
JAMES ANTHONY DAVIS,
10
Petitioner,
11
vs.
12
DWIGHT W. NEVEN, et al.,
13
Case No. 2:15-cv-01574-RFB-NJK
Respondents.
ORDER
14
15
16
Respondents have filed a motion for extension of time (second request) (ECF No. 44). The
court grants this motion.
17
Petitioner has filed a proper-person motion to extend prison copywork limit (ECF No. 41).
18
The court denies this motion for two reasons. First, petitioner may not file proper-person motions
19
because counsel represents petitioner. Second, petitioner’s request is moot because counsel
20
represents petitioner, and counsel will handle any needed photocopying.
21
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondents’ motion for extension of time (second
22
request) (ECF No. 44) is GRANTED. Respondents will have through March 19, 2018, to file and
23
serve an answer or other response to the first amended petition (ECF No. 29).
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s proper-person motion to extend prison
2
copywork limit (ECF No. 41) is DENIED.
3
DATED: February 20, 2018.
4
5
_________________________________
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?