Davis v. Neven et al

Filing 66

ORDER Granting Respondents' 65 First Unopposed Motion to Extend Time Re: 62 Motion for Evidentiary Hearing. Responses due by 12/3/2018. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 10/23/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ADAM PAUL LAXALT Attorney General Heidi Parry Stern (Bar. No. 8873) Chief Deputy Attorney General State of Nevada Office of the Attorney General 555 E. Washington Ave., #3900 Las Vegas, NV 89101-1068 (702) 486-3594 HStern@ag.nv.gov Attorneys for Respondents UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 JAMES ANTHONY DAVIS, 11 Petitioner, 12 vs. 13 DWIGHT W. NEVEN, et al., 14 Case No. 2:15-cv-01574-RFB-NJK UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING (ECF NO. 62) (FIRST REQUEST) Respondents. 15 16 Respondents hereby request an extension of time of an additional forty-five (45) days, up to and 17 including December 3, 2018, within which to file their Opposition to Petitioner’s Motion for Evidentiary 18 Hearing (ECF No. 62). The current due date to file the Opposition is October 19, 2018. 19 This motion is based on the accompanying Declaration of Counsel. 20 DATED: October 19, 2018. 21 22 23 24 ADAM PAUL LAXALT Attorney General By: /s/ Heidi Parry Stern Heidi Parry Stern (Bar. No. 8873) Chief Deputy Attorney General 25 26 27 28 Page 1 of 3 DECLARATION OF HEIDI PARRY STERN 1 2 3 STATE OF NEVADA ) ) ss: COUNTY OF CLARK ) 4 I, HEIDI PARRY STERN, being first duly sworn under oath, depose and state as follows: 5 1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Nevada; qualified and admitted to 6 practice before this Court; employed as a Chief Deputy Attorney General in the Office of the Nevada 7 Attorney General; and pursuant to this employment, I have been assigned to represent Respondents in 8 James Anthony Davis v. Dwight W. Neven, et al., 2:15-cv-01574-RFB-NJK, and as such, have personal 9 knowledge of the matters contained herein. 2. 10 This extension is necessary due to my preparation for oral argument in the Ninth Circuit 11 in Robert Jones v. Jack Palmer, et al., Case No. 17-15575, which took place on October 9, 2018, and 12 Alquandre H. Turner v. Renee Baker, Warden, et al., Case No. 17-72044, which will be taking place on 13 November 16, 2018. 3. 14 15 In addition, our office has been short staffed over the past few months due to the retirement of one of the attorneys in our unit and the difficulty in finding a replacement for him. 16 4. 17 October 19, 2018. 18 5. Respondents request forty-five (45) days to file a reply, up to and including December 3, 20 6. I have contacted opposing counsel, and she has no objection to this request for extension. 21 7. This is Respondents’ first motion for enlargement of time to file the Opposition. 22 8. This motion for enlargement of time is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. 23 DATED this 19th day of October, 2018. 19 24 25 That the Opposition to Petitioner’s Motion for Evidentiary Hearing is due to be filed 2018. APPROVED: DATED this 23rd day of October, 2018. __/s/ Heidi Parry Stern____________________ Heidi Parry Stern (Bar No. 8873) Chief Deputy Attorney General 26 27 28 __________________________ RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II United States District Judge Page 2 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time 3 to File Opposition to Petitioner’s Motion for Evidentiary Hearing (ECF No. 62) (First Request) with the 4 Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system on October 19, 2018. 5 6 7 8 9 The following participants in this case are registered CM/ECF users and will be served by the CM/ECF system: Amelia L. Bizzaro, Esq. Federal Public Defender’s Office 411 E. Bonneville Avenue, Suite 250 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Amelia_bizzaro@fd.org 10 11 /s/ R. Carreau An employee of the Office of the Attorney General 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?