On Demand Direct Response, LLC et al v. McCart-Pollak

Filing 230

ORDER re ECF No. 224 Motion to Unseal, directing Plaintiffs to file a response in opposition or a notice of non-opposition by 2/6/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 2/1/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ON DEMAND DIRECT RESPONSE, LLC, et al., ) ) Plaintiff(s), ) ) vs. ) ) SHANA LEE MCCART-POLLAK, ) ) Defendant(s). ) ) Case No. 2:15-cv-01576-MMD-NJK ORDER 15 Pending before the Court is the motion to unseal documents filed by Plaintiffs. Docket No. 224.1 16 The deadline to respond to the motion to unseal expired on January 30, 2017. See Docket No. 224 at 17 14 (proof of service by mail dated January 13, 2017); Local Rule 7-2(b) (responses to motions must be 18 filed 14 days after service); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d) (adding three days to deadlines where service is 19 effectuated by mail). Accordingly, Plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED to file, no later than February 6, 20 2017, either a response in opposition to the motion to unseal or a notice of non-opposition. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 DATED: February 1, 2017 23 ______________________________________ NANCY J. KOPPE United States Magistrate Judge 24 25 26 27 28 1 The motion does not identify by docket number the documents at issue. The only sealed documents in this case are at Docket No. 44 (motion to seal and Exhibits C & D to supplemental declaration of Mark Meyers in support of motion for preliminary injunction) and Docket No. 78 (transcript of proceedings re: motion for order to show cause and preliminary injunction hearing, held on October 14, 2015).

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?