On Demand Direct Response, LLC et al v. McCart-Pollak

Filing 359

ORDER that the pending motion to calculate costs (ECF No. #348 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/25/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10
11

ON DEMAND DIRECT RESPONSE, LLC,
et al.,

Case No.: 2:15-cv-01576-MMD-NJK

Plaintiff(s),

12
13

v.

14

Order

SHANA LEE MCCART-POLLAK,

15
16

[Docket No. 348]

Defendant(s).
On April 20, 2018, the Court granted Ms. McCart-Pollak’s motion to compel filed against

17 On Demand, and also awarded her costs. Docket No. 342. Now pending before the Court is Ms.
18 McCart-Pollak’s motion to calculate those costs. Docket No. 348. The deadline to respond has
19 expired, see Local Rule 7-2(b), and no response has been filed. Ms. McCart-Pollak seeks to
20 recover $147.42 in costs associated with the filing of the underlying motion (Docket No. 294) and
21 reply thereto (Docket No. 304), as well as for attending the hearing on February 23, 2018. See
22 Docket No. 348 at 2. The Court finds the costs requested to be excessive. Most significantly, the
23 Court will not award costs for large purchases of printer ink claimed in association with the reply
24 brief, but the bulk of which will undoubtedly be used elsewhere. The Court instead finds the
25 reasonable amount of costs incurred to be $60. On Demand shall pay Ms. McCart-Pollak that $60
26 in costs within 30 days of the issuance of this order.
27
28
1

1

Accordingly, the pending motion to calculate costs is GRANTED in part and DENIED in

2 part.
3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4

Dated: May 25, 2018
______________________________
Nancy J. Koppe
United States Magistrate Judge

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2