The Law Offices of Chad M. Golightly v. Morales et al
Filing
44
ORDER Re: Stipulation and order to distribute interpleader proceeds 43 . This case is DISMISSED with prejudice, each side to bear its own fees and costs. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 4/19/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
Case 2:15-cv-01589-JAD-PAL Document 43 Filed 04/18/17 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
CHRISTENSEN JAMES & MARTIN
KEVIN B. CHRISTENSEN, ESQ. (175)
Email: kbc@cjmlv.com
DARYL E. MARTIN, ESQ. (6375)
Email: dem@cjmlv.com
7440 W. Sahara Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89117
Tel.: (702) 255-1718
Fax: (702) 255-0871
Attorneys for Unite Here Health
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
*****
CHRISTENSEN JAMES & MARTIN
7440 WEST SAHARA AVE., LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89117
PH: (702) 255-1718 § FAX: (702) 255-0871
9
10
THE LAW OFFICES OF CHAD M. GOLIGHTLY,
LTD.
11
Case: 2:15-cv-01589-JAD-PAL
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
ONEYDY MORALES, an individual; UNIVERSITY
MEDICAL CENTER; AUXILIARY OF RIVERSIDE
COMMUNITY HOSPITAL; AMERICAN MEDICAL
RESPONSE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA;
MARK GLYMAN, M.D., D.D.S. AND ERIC D.
SWANSON, M.D., D.M.D. LIMITED; SOUTHERN
HILLS MEDICAL CENTER, LLC; UNITE HERE
HEALTH, a foreign corporation; American Medical
Response of Southern California dba American
Medical Response, a foreign corporation; DOES I
through X; ROE
CORPORATIONS XI through XX;
14
15
16
17
18
STIPULATION AND
ORDER TO DISTRIBUTE
INTERPLEADER PROCEEDS
AND TO DISMISS CASE
ECF No. 43
19
Defendants.
20
21
Plaintiff THE LAW OFFICES OF CHAD M. GOLIGHTLY, LTD. (“GOLIGHTLY”) and
22
Defendant UNITE HERE HEALTH (“UHH”) hereby stipulate, agree, and request this Court’s Order
23
24
as stated below.
IT IS STIPULATED that the parties signing this Stipulation and Order are the only parties
25
remaining in this Case. All others have been defaulted for failing to appear or have disclaimed
26
27
28
interest in the monies at issue in this case. See ECF Nos. 39 & 42.
Case 2:15-cv-01589-JAD-PAL Document 43 Filed 04/18/17 Page 2 of 3
1
IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED that UHH and GOLIGHTLY each have valid liens
2
against the $15,000 tort recovery (settlement proceeds) obtained by the now-defaulted defendant
3
Oneydy Morales, and that GOLIGHTLY presently holds the settlement proceeds.
4
5
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that within ten (10) days after approval of
this Stipulation by the Court, GOLIGHTLY shall distribute the sum of $10,000.00 to UHH, in care
6
7
8
of UHH’s counsel, Christensen James & Martin, in full satisfaction of UHH’s lien in the amount of
$70,296.06.
9
///
10
///
11
///
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Case 2:15-cv-01589-JAD-PAL Document 43 Filed 04/18/17 Page 3 of 3
1
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the remaining sum of $5,000.00 may
2
be retained by GOLIGHTLY in full satisfaction of the claims for payment asserted by GOLIGHTLY
3
for attorney’s fees earned and for costs advanced.
4
5
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this matter and any related claims and
cases may be dismissed with prejudice.
6
7
DATED: April 18, 2017
CHRISTENSEN JAMES & MARTIN
8
By:
9
10
/s/ Daryl Martin
Daryl E. Martin (Bar No. 6735)
7440 W. Sahara Ave.
Las Vegas, NV 89117
Attorneys for Unite Here Health
11
12
DATED: April 18, 2017
THE LAW OFFICES OF CHAD M. GOLIGHTLY,
LTD.
13
By:
14
15
16
17
/s/ L. Dipaul Marrerro, II
L. Dipaul Marrrerro II, Esq.
(Bar No. 12441)
8560 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. 240
Las Vegas, NV 89123
Attorneys for The Law Offices of Chad M.
Golightly, Ltd.
18
19
_____________
20
ORDER
21
22
23
24
25
26
Based IT IS SO ORDERED.
on the parties’ stipulation [ECF No. 43] and good cause appearing, IT IS SO
ORDERED. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice, each side to bear its own fees and
costs. Dated:
The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
_______________________________
Jennifer Dorsey
United States District Judge
4/19/17
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?