Hagos v. Washington Mutual Bank, F.A. et al

Filing 39

ORDER that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this order. FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall close the case if plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within the aforementioned deadline. FURTHER ORDERED 37 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/1/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 DANIEL HAGOS, 8 Plaintiff(s), 9 10 Case No. 2:15-CV-1606 JCM (VCF) ORDER v. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A. et al., 11 Defendant(s). 12 13 14 Presently before the court is the matter of Hagos v Washington Mutual Bank FA et al., case number 2:15-cv-1606-JCM-VCF. 15 On July 6, 2016, the court dismissed all of plaintiff’s claims with prejudice except for his 16 claim under NRS Chapter 645, which the court dismissed without prejudice with leave to amend. 17 (ECF No. 34). 18 To date, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, plaintiff has fourteen 19 (14) days within the entry of this order to file an amended complaint. Failure to file an amended 20 complaint will result in dismissal of the instant action. 21 Accordingly, 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint within fourteen 23 (14) days of the entry of this order. 24 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk shall close the case if plaintiff fails to file an 25 amended complaint within the aforementioned deadline. 26 ... 27 ... 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge 1 2 3 4 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 37) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot. DATED December 1, 2016. __________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?