Archuleta et al v. Corrections Corporation of America

Filing 87

ORDER granting ECF No. 86 Stipulation to Extend Time re ECF No. 81 Motion for Summary Judgment. Reply due by 10/9/2019. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/18/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

ROGER L. GRANDGENETT II, ESQ., Bar # 6323
Z. KATHRYN BRANSON, ESQ., Bar # 11540
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
3960 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937
Telephone:
702.862.8800
Fax No.:
702.862.8811
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA
dba NEVADA SOUTHERN DETENTION CENTER

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

11
12
13
14
15
16
17

LEEANN E. ARCHULETA; and
MICHAEL B. DICKENS,

Case No. 2:15-cv-01608-MMD-VCF

Plaintiffs,
vs.
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF
AMERICA, a Maryland corporation, doing
business as NEVADA SOUTHERN
DETENTION CENTER,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANT TO FILE A REPLY IN
SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL
RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12(b)(6)
[SECOND REQUEST]

Defendant.

18
19
Plaintiff

20

LEEANN

E.

ARCHULETA

1

(hereinafter

“Plaintiff”)

and

Defendant

21

CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA dba NEVADA SOUTHERN DETENTION

22

CENTER (hereinafter “Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby

23

stipulate and agree to extend the time for Defendant to file a Reply in Support of its Motion for

24

Summary Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) (ECF Doc. 81), from the

25

current deadline of September 25, 2019, until up to and including October 9, 2019. There is good

26

cause for entering into this stipulation due to scheduling restraints on the part of Defendant’s

27

counsel. Both of Defendant’s counsel have business travel scheduled out of the city to attend and

28

1

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
3960 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937
702.862.8800

Plaintiff Michael B. Dickens no longer is a party to this matter. See ECF Nos. 78, 80.

1

give presentations. Ms. Branson is also scheduled to be out of state thereafter.

2

This is the second request for an extension of time with respect to Defendant’s Reply.2 The

3

parties agree and represent to the Court that this request is made in good faith and not for the

4

purpose of delay.

5

Dated: September 18, 2019

Dated: September 18, 2019

6

Respectfully submitted,

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Robert P. Spretnak
ROBERT P. SPRETNAK, ESQ.
LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT P.
SPRETNAK

/s/ Z. Kathryn Branson
ROGER L. GRANDGENETT II, ESQ.
Z. KATHRYN BRANSON.
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

Attorney for Plaintiff
LEEANN E. ARCHULETA

Attorneys for Defendant
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF
AMERICA dba NEVADA SOUTHERN
DETENTION CENTER

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

ORDER

15

IT IS SO ORDERED.

16

September 18
Dated: _____________________, 2019.

17
18
19

_______________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

20
21
22
23

4836-9259-0246.1 057737.1056

24
25
26
27
The Court granted the parties’ Stipulation to extend the time for Plaintiff to file an Opposition and
gave Defendant an additional week to submit its Reply. (ECF No. 83).

2

28
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
3960 Howard Hughes Parkway
Suite 300
Las Vegas, NV 89169-5937
702.862.8800

2.