Archuleta et al v. Corrections Corporation of America

Filing 99

ORDER - The parties shall file a status report within seven days addressing whether the Court should consider the remaining arguments in Defendant's Motion (ECF No. 81 ), to the extent Defendant is still asserting the remaining arguments. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/11/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

5

***

6
7
8
9
10
11
12

LEEANN E. ARCHULETA; AND
MICHAEL DICKENS, an individual,

Case No. 2:15-cv-01608-MMD-VCF
ORDER

Plaintiffs,
v.
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF
AMERICA, A MARYLAND
CORPORATION DOING BUSINESS AS
NEVADA SOUTHERN DETENTION
CENTER,
Defendant.

13

The Court previously granted Defendant Corrections Corporation of America’s

14

motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 81 (“Motion”)) on Plaintiff1 Leeann Archuleta’s

15

retaliation claim under Title VII. (ECF No. 89 (“Order”).) The Court entered judgment

16

accordingly. (ECF No. 90.) Plaintiff appealed the Order. (ECF No. 92.) The Ninth Circuit

17

Court of Appeals reversed this Court’s summary judgment ruling and remanded for further

18

proceedings. (ECF No. 96.) Accordingly, the Court’s Order granting Defendant summary

19

judgment and the judgment entered (ECF Nos. 89, 90) are vacated.

20

It is therefore ordered that the parties file a status report within seven days

21

addressing whether the Court should consider the remaining arguments in Defendant’s

22

Motion (ECF No. 81), to the extent Defendant is still asserting the remaining arguments.

23

DATED THIS 11th Day of December 2020.

24
25

MIRANDA M. DU
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

26
27
28

1As

indicated by the case caption, Michael Dickens was also a Plaintiff in this case.
However, the Court previously dismissed Dickens’ claims with prejudice. (See ECF No.
80.)