United States of America ex rel v. Clark County et al

Filing 25

ORDER that 23 Motion to Extend Time to Respond re 21 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Responses due by 4/19/2017. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/17/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 8 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. CHERYL NOLTE BARNES ORDER Plaintiff(s), 9 10 11 Case No. 2:15-CV-1621 JCM (VCF) v. CLARK COUNTY, et al., Defendant(s). 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 James C. Mahan U.S. District Judge Presently before the court is relator Cheryl Nolte Barnes’s motion for a seven-day extension to file her opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 23). Defendants do not oppose this motion, and the same will be granted. See LR IA 6-1; (ECF No. 24). However, defendants clarify that, although omitted in relator’s motion, they consented to relator’s extension on the condition that relator would agree for an extension of their time to file a corresponding reply. (ECF No. 24). Unlike relator’s motion, the defendants’ filing does not explain the reason for that requested extension and therefore does not comply with Local Rule IA 6-1(a). See (ECF No. 23, 24). Thus, there will be no extension of the reply deadline at this time. Any future request for an extension of time is to comply with that rule. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that relator’s motion to extend time (ECF No. 23) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. DATED April 17, 2017. __________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?