United States of America ex rel v. Clark County et al

Filing 25

ORDER that 23 Motion to Extend Time to Respond re 21 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Responses due by 4/19/2017. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/17/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6

***

7
8

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel.
CHERYL NOLTE BARNES

ORDER
Plaintiff(s),

9
10
11

Case No. 2:15-CV-1621 JCM (VCF)

v.
CLARK COUNTY, et al.,
Defendant(s).

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge

Presently before the court is relator Cheryl Nolte Barnes’s motion for a seven-day
extension to file her opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 23). Defendants do
not oppose this motion, and the same will be granted. See LR IA 6-1; (ECF No. 24).
However, defendants clarify that, although omitted in relator’s motion, they consented to
relator’s extension on the condition that relator would agree for an extension of their time to file a
corresponding reply. (ECF No. 24).
Unlike relator’s motion, the defendants’ filing does not explain the reason for that
requested extension and therefore does not comply with Local Rule IA 6-1(a). See (ECF No. 23,
24). Thus, there will be no extension of the reply deadline at this time. Any future request for an
extension of time is to comply with that rule.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that relator’s motion to
extend time (ECF No. 23) be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED.
DATED April 17, 2017.
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE