Azure Manor/Rancho de Paz Homeowners Association v. D.R. Horton, Inc. et al

Filing 211

ORDER REGARDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Accepting and Adopting 199 Report and Recommendation, 109 Report and Recommendation, 204 Report and Recommendation, 200 Report and Recommendation, 83 Report and Recommendation, 110 Report and Recommendation, 201 Report and Recommendation, 198 Report and Recommendation and dismissing case with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 6/22/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
4

AZURE MANOR/RANCHO DE PAZ
HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION,

5
6

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
vs.

7
8
9

D.R. HORTON, INC. et al.,
Defendants.

Case No.: 2:15-cv-01623-GMN-VCF
ORDER

10
11

Pending before the Court are the Reports and Recommendations, (ECF Nos. 83, 109,

12

110, 198, 199, 200, 201, and 204), which recommend, inter alia, granting the parties’ motions

13

for determination of good faith settlements.

14

A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a

15

United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B);

16

D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo

17

determination of those portions to which objections are made. Id. The Court may accept, reject,

18

or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge.

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is

20

not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an

21

objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized

22

that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation

23

where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114,

24

1122 (9th Cir. 2003).

25

Here, no objections were filed, and the deadlines to do so have passed.

Page 1 of 2

1

Accordingly,

2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Reports and Recommendations, (ECF Nos. 83,

3
4

109, 110, 198, 199, 200, 201, and 204), are ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to the Report and Recommendation

5

entered on May 26, 2017, all claims against all parties are dismissed with prejudice, each side

6

bearing its costs and attorney fees.

7

The Clerk is instructed to close the case.

8
9

22
DATED this _____ day of June, 2017.

10
11
12

___________________________________
Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge
United States District Court

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Page 2 of 2