Recalde v. Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc. et al
Filing
30
ORDER Granting 29 Stipulated Protective Order Concerning Confidential Information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 03/14/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
Case 2:15-cv-01627-JCM-NJK Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
JAMES P. KEMP, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No.: 6375
VICTORIA L. NEAL, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No.: 13382
KEMP & KEMP
7435 W. Azure Drive, Ste 110
Las Vegas, NV 89130
702-258-1183 ph./702-258-6983 fax
jp@kemp-attorneys.com
vneal@kemp-attorneys.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
***
9
10
11
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
7435 W. AZURE DR., SUITE 110
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89130
Tel. (702) 258-1183 ♦ Fax (702) 258-6983
KEMP & KEMP
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
)
MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORTS, INC., a
)
Foreign Corporation, D/B/A/MARRIOTT
)
VACATION INTERNATIONAL CLUB GRAND )
CHATEAU, LAS VEGAS; CATHERINE
)
LOVERA, an individual; DOES I through X; and )
ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES I through X, inclusive, )
)
Defendants.
)
GALO RECALDE,
Case No. 2:15-cv-01627-JCM-NJK
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE
ORDER CONCERNING
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
19
Plaintiff, GALO RECALDE, by and through counsel of record Kemp & Kemp, and
20
Defendants, MARRIOTT OWNERSHIP RESORTS, INC., et al., by and through counsel of
21
record, Payne and Fears, hereby request the Court enter the following Stipulated Protective
22
Order Concerning Confidential Information. This Stipulation is brought pursuant to and in
23
24
compliance with Local Rule 7-1.
25
…
26
…
27
…
28
1
Case 2:15-cv-01627-JCM-NJK Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 2 of 9
1
This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ Stipulated Protective Order
2
Concerning Confidential Information. Being fully appraised of the premises, the Court orders the
3
following:
4
I.
PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS OF “CONFIDENTIAL” MATERIALS
5
Discovery in this action may involve the production of confidential or private information
6
7
for which special protection may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to entry
8
of the following Protective Order. The Order does not confer blanket protection on all
9
disclosures or responses to discovery. The protection it affords from public disclosure and use
10
extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under
11
the applicable legal principles, and it does not presumptively entitle parties to file confidential
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
7435 W. AZURE DR., SUITE 110
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89130
Tel. (702) 258-1183 ♦ Fax (702) 258-6983
KEMP & KEMP
12
13
information under seal.
The Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order shall apply to documents,
14
15
materials and information that a party to this litigation has produced or may produce which that
16
party in good faith believes contains confidential or proprietary and business, personnel, or
17
financial information, or private or confidential medical information, of any party or non-party,
18
19
including but not limited to personal health information protected by HIPAA (collectively
“Information”).
20
Nothing herein shall be deemed to restrict the right of the party making a confidential
21
22
designation from using that information as it chooses. By entering into this Order, the parties do
23
not waive any right to object to any discovery request, to the admission of evidence on any other
24
ground, to seek further protective order, or to seek relief from the Court from any provision of
25
the Order.
26
…
27
28
2
Case 2:15-cv-01627-JCM-NJK Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 3 of 9
1
2
3
II.
SCOPE.
The protections conferred by this agreement cover not only confidential material (as
defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from confidential material; (2)
4
all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of confidential material; and (3) any testimony,
5
6
or presentations by parties or their counsel that might reveal confidential material. However, the
7
protections conferred by this agreement do not cover information that is in the public domain or
8
becomes part of the public domain through trial or otherwise.
9
10
11
III. ACCESS TO AND USE OF CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL.
A. Basic Principles. A receiving party may use confidential material that is disclosed or
produced by another party or by a non-party in connection with this case only for prosecuting,
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
7435 W. AZURE DR., SUITE 110
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89130
Tel. (702) 258-1183 ♦ Fax (702) 258-6983
KEMP & KEMP
12
13
14
defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Confidential material may be disclosed only to
the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this agreement. Confidential
15
material must be stored and maintained by a receiving party at a location and in a secure manner
16
that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this agreement.
17
18
19
B. Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Material. Unless otherwise ordered by the court
or permitted in writing by the designating party, a receiving party may disclose any confidential
material only to:
20
1.
attorneys actively working on this case;
22
2.
persons regularly employed or associated with the attorneys actively
23
working on the case whose assistance is required by said attorneys in the
24
preparation for trial, at trial, or at other proceedings in this case;
25
3.
the parties, including designated representatives for Defendants;
4.
expert witnesses and consultants retained in connection with this
21
26
27
28
3
Case 2:15-cv-01627-JCM-NJK Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 4 of 9
1
proceeding, to the extent such disclosure is necessary for preparation, trial or
2
other proceedings in this case;
3
5.
6.
4
the Court and its employees (“Court Personnel”);
stenographic reporters who are engaged in proceedings necessarily
5
incident to the conduct of this action;
6
7
7.
deponents, witnesses, or potential witnesses; and
8
8.
other persons by written agreement of the parties.
9
C. Filing Confidential Material. Before filing confidential material or discussing or
10
referencing such material in court filings, the filing party shall confer with the designating party
11
to determine whether the designating party will remove the confidential designation, whether the
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
7435 W. AZURE DR., SUITE 110
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89130
Tel. (702) 258-1183 ♦ Fax (702) 258-6983
KEMP & KEMP
12
13
14
document can be redacted, or whether a motion to seal or stipulation and proposed order is
warranted.
15
The parties recognize that designating Information as Confidential is not sufficient
16
grounds for that document to be filed under seal in connection with either a non-dispositive or
17
dispositive motion. The parties acknowledge that to overcome the presumption of public access
18
19
and maintain the confidentiality of Information designated as Confidential that is attached to a
non-dispositive motion, the party seeking to maintain the Confidential designation of that
20
21
Information must meet the “good cause” standard articulated in Kamakana v. City and County of
22
Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006). The parties further acknowledge that, to overcome the
23
presumption of public access and maintain the confidentiality of Information designated as
24
Confidential that is attached to a dispositive motion, the party seeking to maintain the
25
Confidential designation of that Information must meet the “compelling reasons” standard
26
articulated in Kamakana.
27
28
4
Case 2:15-cv-01627-JCM-NJK Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 5 of 9
1
If the sole ground for a motion to seal is that the opposing party has designated a
2
document subject to protection pursuant this stipulated protective order, the movant must notify
3
the opposing party at least seven (7) days prior to filing the designated document. The
4
designating party must make a good faith determination if the relevant standard for sealing is
5
6
met. To the extent the designating party does not believe the relevant standard for sealing can be
7
met, if shall indicate that the document may be filed publicly no later than four (4) days after
8
receiving notice of the intended filing. To the extent the designating party believes the relevant
9
standard for sealing can be met, it shall provide a declaration supporting that assertion no later
10
than four (4) days after receiving notice of the intended filing. The filing party shall then attach
11
that declaration to its motion to seal the designated material. If the designating party fails to
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
7435 W. AZURE DR., SUITE 110
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89130
Tel. (702) 258-1183 ♦ Fax (702) 258-6983
KEMP & KEMP
12
13
14
provide such a declaration in support of the motion to seal, the filing party shall file a motion to
seal so indicating and the Court may order the document filed in the public record.
15
In the event of an emergency motion, the above procedures shall not apply. Instead the
16
movant shall file a motion to seal and the designating party shall file a declaration in support of
17
that motion to seal within three (3) days of its filing. If the designating party fails to timely file
18
19
such declaration, the Court may order the document filed in the public record.
IV. DESIGNATING CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL.
20
21
A. Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each
22
party that designates information or items for protection under this agreement must take care to
23
limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The
24
designating party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or
25
oral or written communications that qualify, so that other portions of the material, documents,
26
27
28
5
Case 2:15-cv-01627-JCM-NJK Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 6 of 9
1
items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably
2
within the ambit of this Agreement.
3
Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are
4
shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to
5
6
7
unnecessarily encumber or delay the case development process or to impose unnecessary
expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the designating party to sanctions.
8
If it comes to a designating party’s attention that information or items that it designated
9
for protection do not qualify for protection, the designating party must promptly notify all other
10
11
parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation.
B. Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
7435 W. AZURE DR., SUITE 110
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89130
Tel. (702) 258-1183 ♦ Fax (702) 258-6983
KEMP & KEMP
12
13
14
15
agreement, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, disclosure or discovery material that qualifies
for protection under this agreement must be clearly so designated before or when the material is
disclosed or produced.
16
1.
17
deposition exhibits), but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or
18
trial proceedings); the designating party must affix the word “CONFIDENTIAL”
19
Information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents and
to each page that contains confidential material. If only a portion of the material
20
21
on a page qualifies for protection, the producing party also must clearly identify
22
the protected portions(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins).
23
2.
24
proceeding, with reasonable precision as to the affected testimony, or within
25
fifteen business days after receipt of the transcript of such deposition or
26
Oral testimony may be designated as Confidential during the deposition or
proceeding by sending written notice of the designation, and identifying by page
27
28
6
Case 2:15-cv-01627-JCM-NJK Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 7 of 9
1
and line, the portions of the transcript of the deposition or other testimony to be
2
treated as Confidential.
3
3.
Other tangible items: the producing party must affix in a prominent place
4
on the exterior of the container or containers in which the information or item is
5
stored the word “CONFIDENTIAL.” If only a portion or portions of the
6
7
information or item warrant protection, the producing party, to the extent
8
practicable, shall identify the protected portion(s).
9
C. Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If corrected within 10 business days, an
10
inadvertent failure to designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the
11
designating party’s right to secure protection under this agreement for such material. Upon
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
7435 W. AZURE DR., SUITE 110
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89130
Tel. (702) 258-1183 ♦ Fax (702) 258-6983
KEMP & KEMP
12
13
14
15
notification within 10 business days of the correction of a designation, the receiving party must
make reasonable efforts to ensure that the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of
this agreement.
16
D. No Implied Acknowledgment of Confidentiality. Compliance with the terms of
17
this Order, production or receipt of Information designated Confidential, and/or allowing
18
19
Information to be designated Confidential shall not in any way operate as an admission that any
particular Information is Confidential. Failure to challenge the designation of Information as
20
21
22
23
Confidential does not preclude a subsequent challenge. The designation of Information as
Confidential does not create a presumption in favor of or against that designation.
V.
CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIAL DESIGNATIONS.
24
A. Either party may challenge at any time the propriety of a designation or Information
25
as Confidential. Before seeking relief from the Court, the parties shall attempt to resolve the
26
dispute informally and in good faith. The parties will meet and confer, either in person, or
27
28
7
Case 2:15-cv-01627-JCM-NJK Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 8 of 9
1
telephonically, and endeavor to resolve any issues related to the designation of information as
2
confidential within 30 days of the documents being designated as confidential. To the extent the
3
parties are unable to informally and in good faith resolve their differences, within 7 days of the
4
unsuccessful meet-and-confer, the designating party must file a motion to retain confidentiality
5
6
under Local Rule 26-7 (and in compliance with Local Rule 10-5 if applicable). The burden of
7
persuasion in any such motion shall be on the designating party. Frivolous challenges, and those
8
made for an improper purpose (e.g. to harass or impose unnecessary expense and burdens on the
9
other parties) may expose the challenging party to sanctions. All parties shall continue to
10
11
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
7435 W. AZURE DR., SUITE 110
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89130
Tel. (702) 258-1183 ♦ Fax (702) 258-6983
KEMP & KEMP
12
13
14
maintain the material in question as confidential until the court rules on the challenge.
…
…
…
15
…
16
…
17
…
18
…
19
…
20
21
22
…
…
23
…
24
…
25
…
26
…
27
28
8
Case 2:15-cv-01627-JCM-NJK Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 9 of 9
1
2
3
4
VI. CONCLUSION OF PROCEEDINGS.
Following the termination of this litigation by final judgment, settlement or otherwise
(including appeals), the parties agree to maintain Information subject to this Order as
Confidential and consistent with their respective firms’ client file and document retention
5
6
requirements.
7
8
Dated this 11th day of March, 2016.
Dated this 11th day of March, 2016.
9
10
11
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
7435 W. AZURE DR., SUITE 110
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89130
Tel. (702) 258-1183 ♦ Fax (702) 258-6983
KEMP & KEMP
12
13
14
___Victoria L. Neal_______________
JAMES P. KEMP, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No.: 6375
VICTORIA L. NEAL, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No.: 13382
KEMP & KEMP
____Chad. D. Olsen________________
MATTHEW L. DURHAM, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No.: 10342
CHAD D. OLSEN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar. No.: 12060
PAYNE & FEARS
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Attorneys for Defendant
15
16
17
18
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED:
19
20
21
March 14, 2016
Dated: ___________________
________________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
HONORABLE NANCY J. KOPPE
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
9
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?