Diaz v. Green Tree Services, LLC, et al.

Filing 7

ORDER Granting 6 Stipulation to Extend Time re 1 Complaint. Capital One Bank answer due 10/9/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 9/17/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

Download PDF
Case 2:15-cv-01648-APG-CWH Document 6 Filed 09/16/15 Page 1 of 3 FERNALD LAW GROUP LLP 1 BRANDON C. FERNALD (SBN 10582) brandon.fernald@fernaldlawgroup.com 2 6236 Laredo Street Las Vegas, NV 89146 3 Tel: 702.410.7500 Fax: 702.410.7520 4 Attorneys for Defendant, 5 CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A., Erroneously Named As Capital One Bank, 6 National Association 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 12 FIDEL DIAZ, CASE NO.: 2:15-CV-01648-APG-CWH Plaintiff, Assigned To The Hon. Judge Andrew P. Gordon; Referred To The Hon. Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman 15 GREEN TREE SERVICES, LLC, CAPITAL ONE BANK, NATIONAL 16 ASSOCIATION, AND EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, 17 Defendants. 18 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT 13 14 19 v. (FIRST REQUEST) Complaint Filed: 08/26/2015 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT Case 2:15-cv-01648-APG-CWH Document 6 Filed 09/16/15 Page 2 of 3 1 Plaintiff Fidel Diaz (“Plaintiff”), by and through his counsel of record, and 2 Defendant Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., erroneously named as “Capital One Bank 3 National Association” (“Capital One”), by and through its counsel of record, hereby 4 submit this stipulation to extend Capital One’s time to file a responsive pleading to 5 Plaintiff’s Complaint by fifteen (15) days, as follows: 6 WHEREAS: 7 1. Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this matter on August 26, 2015; 8 2. Capital One’s deadline to file its responsive pleading to the Complaint is 9 September 24, 2015; 10 3. The Parties agree that a brief extension of time for Capital One to file its 11 responsive pleading to the Complaint would benefit both Parties because it will allow 12 them to gather additional facts and information while continuing to devote their 13 resources to exploring the potential for early resolution of this matter before incurring 14 further fees and costs; 15 4. Capital One and Plaintiff have agreed to extend Capital One’s current 16 September 24, 2015 deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint by fifteen (15) days 17 to Friday, October 9, 2015; 18 / / / 19 / / / 20 / / / 21 / / / 22 / / / 23 / / / 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 1 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT Case 2:15-cv-01648-APG-CWH Document 6 Filed 09/16/15 Page 3 of 3 1 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT: 2 Capital One will file its responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or 3 before Friday, October 9, 2015. 4 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 5 DATED: September 15, 2015 HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC 6 By: __/s/ David H, Krieger___________ DAVID H. KRIEGER Nevada Bar No. 9086 Attorneys for Plaintiff FIDEL DIAZ 7 8 9 10 DATED: September 15, 2015 FERNALD LAW GROUP LLP 11 12 By:__/s/ Brandon C. Fernald__________ BRANDON C. FERNALD Nevada Bar No.10582 Attorneys for Defendant, CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. 13 14 15 16 17 ORDER The Court has reviewed the Stipulation filed by Plaintiff Fidel Diaz and 18 Defendant Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., erroneously named as “Capital One Bank 19 National Association” (“Capital One”), to extend Capital One’s time to file a 20 responsive pleading by fifteen (15) days. The Stipulation is incorporated herein by 21 reference. Good cause appearing thereon, the Court hereby orders as follows: 22 Capital One’s time to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint is hereby 23 extended. Capital One shall file its responsive pleading to the Complaint on or before 24 Friday, October 9, 2015. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 DATED: September 17, 2015 ______________________________ The Honorable Judge Andrew P. Gordon United States Magistrate Judge United States District Court Judge 28 2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?