Diaz v. Green Tree Services, LLC, et al.
Filing
7
ORDER Granting 6 Stipulation to Extend Time re 1 Complaint. Capital One Bank answer due 10/9/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 9/17/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
Case 2:15-cv-01648-APG-CWH Document 6 Filed 09/16/15 Page 1 of 3
FERNALD LAW GROUP LLP
1 BRANDON C. FERNALD (SBN 10582)
brandon.fernald@fernaldlawgroup.com
2 6236 Laredo Street
Las Vegas, NV 89146
3 Tel: 702.410.7500
Fax: 702.410.7520
4
Attorneys for Defendant,
5 CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.,
Erroneously Named As Capital One Bank,
6 National Association
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11
12
FIDEL DIAZ,
CASE NO.: 2:15-CV-01648-APG-CWH
Plaintiff,
Assigned To The Hon. Judge Andrew P.
Gordon; Referred To The Hon.
Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman
15 GREEN TREE SERVICES, LLC,
CAPITAL ONE BANK, NATIONAL
16 ASSOCIATION, AND EQUIFAX
INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC,
17
Defendants.
18
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT
13
14
19
v.
(FIRST REQUEST)
Complaint Filed:
08/26/2015
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT
Case 2:15-cv-01648-APG-CWH Document 6 Filed 09/16/15 Page 2 of 3
1
Plaintiff Fidel Diaz (“Plaintiff”), by and through his counsel of record, and
2 Defendant Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., erroneously named as “Capital One Bank
3 National Association” (“Capital One”), by and through its counsel of record, hereby
4 submit this stipulation to extend Capital One’s time to file a responsive pleading to
5 Plaintiff’s Complaint by fifteen (15) days, as follows:
6 WHEREAS:
7
1.
Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this matter on August 26, 2015;
8
2.
Capital One’s deadline to file its responsive pleading to the Complaint is
9 September 24, 2015;
10
3.
The Parties agree that a brief extension of time for Capital One to file its
11 responsive pleading to the Complaint would benefit both Parties because it will allow
12 them to gather additional facts and information while continuing to devote their
13 resources to exploring the potential for early resolution of this matter before incurring
14 further fees and costs;
15
4.
Capital One and Plaintiff have agreed to extend Capital One’s current
16 September 24, 2015 deadline to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint by fifteen (15) days
17 to Friday, October 9, 2015;
18 / / /
19 / / /
20 / / /
21 / / /
22 / / /
23 / / /
24 / / /
25 / / /
26 / / /
27 / / /
28 / / /
1
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT
Case 2:15-cv-01648-APG-CWH Document 6 Filed 09/16/15 Page 3 of 3
1
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT:
2
Capital One will file its responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s Complaint on or
3 before Friday, October 9, 2015.
4 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
5 DATED: September 15, 2015
HAINES & KRIEGER, LLC
6
By: __/s/ David H, Krieger___________
DAVID H. KRIEGER
Nevada Bar No. 9086
Attorneys for Plaintiff
FIDEL DIAZ
7
8
9
10 DATED: September 15, 2015
FERNALD LAW GROUP LLP
11
12
By:__/s/ Brandon C. Fernald__________
BRANDON C. FERNALD
Nevada Bar No.10582
Attorneys for Defendant,
CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A.
13
14
15
16
17
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Stipulation filed by Plaintiff Fidel Diaz and
18 Defendant Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., erroneously named as “Capital One Bank
19 National Association” (“Capital One”), to extend Capital One’s time to file a
20 responsive pleading by fifteen (15) days. The Stipulation is incorporated herein by
21 reference. Good cause appearing thereon, the Court hereby orders as follows:
22
Capital One’s time to file a responsive pleading to the Complaint is hereby
23 extended. Capital One shall file its responsive pleading to the Complaint on or before
24 Friday, October 9, 2015.
25 IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27 DATED: September 17, 2015
______________________________
The Honorable Judge Andrew P. Gordon
United States Magistrate Judge
United States District Court Judge
28
2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?