Nevada West Petroleum, LLC v. BP West Coast Products, LLC, et al.,
Filing
80
ORDER Granting 78 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request) to Respond to 72 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 73 MOTION for Summary Judgment Regarding Damages, and 76 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment. Responses due by 2/8/2017. Replies due by 2/22/2017. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/7/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Case 2:15-cv-01684-APG-PAL Document 78 Filed 02/07/17 Page 1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
JEFFREY I. PITEGOFF, ESQ./ Nevada Bar No. 005458
CHRISTOPHER A. TURTZO, ESQ./ Nevada Bar No. 10253
MORRIS, SULLIVAN, LEMKUL & PITEGOFF
3770 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 170
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169
Telephone No. (702) 405-8100
Fax No. (702) 405-8101
turtzo@morrissullivanlaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
9
10
11
12
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
NEVADA WEST PETROLEUM, LLC, a
Nevada limited liability company;
QUARAMAN MESQUITE, LLC, a Nevada
limited liability company; and QUARAMAN
SUNSET / DECATUR, LLC, a Nevada
Limited Liability Company
13
Plaintiffs,
14
vs.
15
BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS, LLC,, a
Delaware limited liability company; TESORO
REFINING & MARKETING COMPANY;
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
TREASURE FRANCHISE COMPANY,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company;
DEREK TOMITA, an individual; MICHAEL
GLASSMAN, an individual; and JEFF
CAREY, an individual.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 2:15-CV-01684-APG-PAL
STIPULATION TO EXTEND
DEADLINES TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING
LIABILITY AND DAMAGES (ECF
DOC. NOS. 72. 73 and 76)
(FIRST REQUEST)
Defendants.
On January 17, 2017, Defendants filed their Motion for Summary Judgment regarding
Liability (ECF No. 72) and their Motion for Summary Judgment regarding Damages (ECF No.
73). On January 17, 2017, Plaintiffs filed their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No.
76). The current deadline for responses to all three (3) motions is February 7, 2017.
The parties hereto, by and through the undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate
and agree to extend the deadline for Plaintiffs to respond to Defendants’ two Motions for
Summary Judgment and for Defendants to respond to Nevada West Petroleum, LLC’s Motion
for Partial Summary Judgment by one day, to February 8, 2017. The parties additionally agree to
Case 2:15-cv-01684-APG-PAL Document 78 Filed 02/07/17 Page 2 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
extend the deadline for the parties to file any replies to the responses by one judicial day, from
February 21, 2107 to February 22, 2017.
This is the first request for an extension of this deadline. The reason for the requested
extensions is that Plaintiffs’ counsel has trial starting in the Eighth Judicial District Court for
Clark County, Nevada in another matter on February 7, 2017, which is the current due date for
the responses. Therefore, Plaintiffs require one additional day to finalize their response to the
Defendants’ motions.
The motions have not been set for hearing. Accordingly, the parties believe that
extending the response and reply deadlines by a single day will not prejudice any party or the
Court’s schedule.
DATED this 7th day of February, 2017.
MORRIS, SULLIVAN, LEMKUL &
PITEGOFF
FENNEMORE CRAIG
/s/ Christopher Turtzo_____________
JEFFREY I. PITEGOFF, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 005458
CHRISTOPHER A. TURTZO, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 010253
3770 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 170
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Attorney for Plaintiffs
/s/ Courtney Beller
___________
DOUGLAS C. NORTHRUP (Admitted Pro
Hac Vice)
COURTNEY R. BELLER
Nevada Bar No. 12073
2394 E. Camelback Road, Suite 600
Phoenix, Arizona 85016-3429
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
CHRISTOPHER H. BYRD
Nevada Bar No. 1633
300 S. Fourth Street, Suite 1400
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Attorneys for Defendants
23
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
_____________________________________
United States District Court Judge
27
February 7, 2017
Dated:_______________________________
28
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?