Butler v. Clark County

Filing 27

ORDER Granting 26 Stipulation re Confidential Information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 8/4/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Download PDF
1 8 FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP MARK J. RICCIARDI, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 3141 DAVID B. DORNAK, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6274 ALLISON L. KHEEL, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 12986 300 S Fourth Street Suite 1500 Las Vegas, NV 89101 Telephone: (702) 252-3131 Facsimile: (702) 252-7411 E-Mail Address: akheel@fisherphillips.com 9 Attorneys for Defendant 2 3 4 5 6 10 300 S. Fourth Street, Suite 1500 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 DISTRICT OF NEVADA LEE BUTLER, an Individual, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) CLARK COUNTY, a political ) subdivision of the STATE OF NEVADA, ) DOES 1 through 10; and ROE ) CORPORATIONS 11 through 20, ) inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________ ) Case No. 2:15-cv-01689-APG-VCF STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION 21 Plaintiff, Lee Butler, by and through his counsel of record, Christian Gabroy, 22 Esq., and Defendant by and through its counsel, Allison L. Kheel, Esq., hereby agree 23 and stipulate as follows: 24 /// 25 /// 26 27 28 /// FPDOCS 32056176.1 -1- 1 1. The parties enter into this Stipulation and Protective Order under Federal 2 Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) to establish procedures for the handling of documents 3 produced by the parties in response to discovery requests and/or documents produced 4 by third parties in response to subpoena served by either party. 5 2. Any party may designate and mark certain documents produced in response 7 PROTECTIVE ORDER.” The party designating such documents shall be referred to as 8 the Designating Party and any party in receipt of such documents shall be referred to as 9 the Receiving Party. Documents so marked may be used only for purposes of this 10 300 S. Fourth Street, Suite 1500 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP 6 3. discovery requests as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “SUBJECT TO litigation. 11 to Except as otherwise ordered by this Court, documents marked 12 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” and the contents of 13 documents so marked may be disclosed only to employees or agents of Clark County, 14 Nevada, and the following persons: 15 (a) counsel of record for Plaintiff; 16 (b) counsel of record for Defendants; 17 (c) the non-technical and clerical staff employed by counsel; 18 (d) interpreters and copying services employed by counsel of 19 record’s employer to the extent reasonably necessary to render professional services in 20 this case; 21 22 23 24 25 (e) any private court reporter retained by counsel for depositions in (f) subject to the terms of paragraph 5, persons retained by counsel this case; to serve as expert witnesses or consultants in this case; and (g) personnel of the Court, including court reporters, officials and 26 employees of the Clerk of Court, and staff of the presiding United States District Judge 27 and United States Magistrate Judge, to the extent deemed necessary by the Court. -2FPDOCS 32056176.1 28 1 4. If counsel for a Receiving Party determines that it is necessary to ORDER” to any persons other than the individuals included in paragraph 3, that counsel 4 shall set forth the grounds for the disclosure and seek the written consent of counsel for 5 the Designating Party. The Designating Party shall respond to the Receiving Party’s 6 request within seven calendar days unless the Receiving Party agrees to a longer period. 7 If counsel for the Designating Party does not consent, counsel for the Receiving Party 8 and counsel for the Designating Party shall within five court days of the Designating 9 Party’s response meet and confer in person or telephonically regarding the issue, during 10 300 S. Fourth Street, Suite 1500 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 disclose any document marked “CONFIDENTIAL” or “SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE 3 FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP 2 which meeting and conference counsel for the Receiving Party shall specify the reasons 11 why disclosure is necessary. If any agreement is not reached, the Designating Party 12 shall move the Court within the ten calendar days of the meeting and conference for a 13 protective order preventing disclosure. The Receiving Party shall not disclose the 14 document unless the Designating Party has failed to file a motion within the time 15 allowed or the Court has denied the motion. 16 5. If counsel for the Receiving Party determines that it is necessary to 17 disclose any document marked “CONFIDENTIAL” or “SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE 18 ORDER” to an expert or consultants retained to render professional services in this 19 case, that counsel shall notify counsel for the Designating Party in writing at least seven 20 days before the proposed disclosure with the name of the expert or consultant. The 21 Designating Party shall respond to the Receiving Party’s notification within seven 22 calendar days unless the Receiving Party agrees to a longer period. If counsel for the 23 Designating Party objects, counsel for the Receiving Party and counsel for the 24 Designating Party shall within five court days of the Designating Party’s response meet 25 and confer in person or telephonically regarding the issue. If an agreement is not 26 reached, the Designating Party shall move the court within ten calendar days of the 27 meeting and conference for a protective order preventing disclosure. The Receiving -3FPDOCS 32056176.1 28 1 Party shall not disclose the document unless the Designating Party has failed to file a 2 motion within the time allowed or the Court denies the motion. 3 6. Any party may object to the propriety of the designation of documents as setting forth in writing the grounds for the objection. The Designating Party shall 6 respond to the Receiving Party’s objection within seven calendar days unless the 7 Receiving Party agrees to a longer period. If an agreement is not reached, counsel for 8 the Receiving Party and counsel for the Designating Party shall within five court days 9 of the Designating Party’s response meet and confer in person or telephonically, during 10 300 S. Fourth Street, Suite 1500 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” by objecting and 5 FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP 4 which meeting and conference counsel for the Receiving Party shall specify the grounds 11 for objection with respect to each document at issue. If the parties cannot agree, then the 12 Designating Party will then have ten calendar days after the conference of counsel to 13 file a motion to preserve the confidentiality designation. The burden of proof to 14 demonstrate confidential treatment of any information at all times remain with the 15 Designating Party. The parties shall treat the documents as the subject to this Stipulation 16 and Order unless the Designating Party has failed to file a motion within the time 17 allowed or the Court has denied the motion. 18 7. Before disclosing any document marked “CONFIDENTIAL” or 19 “SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” to any person identified in subparagraph (c) 20 of paragraph 3, counsel of record for the Receiving Party shall advise that person of the 21 terms of this Stipulation and Protective Order and that he or she is bound by those 22 terms. In addition, before disclosing any document marked “CONFIDENTIAL” or 23 “SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” to any person identified in subparagraphs (d), 24 (e), or (f) of paragraph 3, counsel for the Receiving Party shall ensure that the person 25 (1) has read and agrees to the terms of this Protective Order and (2) has acknowledged 26 his or her agreement by signing a copy of the attached Acknowledgment before any 27 such document is disclosed to him or her: 28 FPDOCS 32056176.1 -4- 1 ACKNOWLEDGMENT 2 I have read the Stipulation and Protective Order Governing Documents Produced by the Parties in this case. I understand its terms and agree to be bound by the terms of the Protective Order. I understand that my duties under the Protective Order will survive the termination of this case and that failure to comply with its terms may result in the District Court imposing sanctions on me. I consent to personal jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada for the purpose of enforcing the Protective Order. 3 4 5 6 8. Counsel for each party shall retain copies of the Acknowledgment forms 7 executed by persons authorized for access on behalf of that party until this litigation, 8 including all appeals, concludes. Nothing in this Protective Order restricts the 9 300 S. Fourth Street, Suite 1500 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP Designation Party’s own disclosure of documents marked “CONFIDENTIAL” or 10 “SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER.” 11 9. Any person receiving access to a document marked “CONFIDENTIAL” 12 or “SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” shall maintain the document, any copies of 13 the document, and any information derived from the document in a confidential manner 14 and shall take steps to avoid disclosure to persons not authorized under this Order to 15 have access to the documents or information. 16 10. Within thirty days of the conclusion of this litigation, including all 17 appeals, counsel for the Receiving Party shall destroy or send to counsel for the 18 Designating Party all copies of documents marked “CONFIDENTIAL” or “SUBJECT 19 TO PROTECTIVE ORDER.” 20 Notwithstanding this paragraph, however, the parties’ attorneys may retain one 21 copy of each document filed with the Court that contains or refers to any of the 22 designated documents. Furthermore, nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to 23 require the parties’ attorneys to disclose any attorney work-product to opposing counsel. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 28 FPDOCS 32056176.1 -5- 1 11. In connection with a deposition in this case, a witness or any counsel 2 may indicate that a question or answer refers to the content of a document marked 3 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER.” If the indication 4 occurs on the record during the deposition, all persons not authorized to review such 5 documents shall leave the deposition room until completion of the answers referring to 6 the document and the reporter shall mark the transcript of the designated testimony 7 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER.” 8 12. If any party wishes to submit into the written record of this case any document marked “CONFIDENTIAL” or “SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER” or 10 300 S. Fourth Street, Suite 1500 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP 9 excerpts from any such document, that party shall seek to submit the document under 11 seal. 12 13. Nothing in this Stipulation and Protective Order prevents any party from 13 challenging any assertion of privilege by any party, and nothing in this Stipulation and 14 Protective Order constitutes a waiver of any assertion of privilege by any party or 15 precludes any party from moving for consideration of information ex parte and in 16 camera. 17 /// 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 FPDOCS 32056176.1 -6- 1 14. Anyone found to be in violation of this Order may have sanctions 2 imposed against him or her as the Court may determine and allowable under law and 3 may also be subject to contempt of court proceedings. 4 DATED this 3rd day of August, 2016. DATED this 3rd day of August, 2016. 5 FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP GABROY LAW OFFICES 6 7 8 10 300 S. Fourth Street, Suite 1500 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP 9 11 By: /s/ Allison L. Kheel, Esq. By: /s/ Christian Gabroy, Esq. Allison L. Kheel, Esq. Christian Gabroy, Esq. 300 S. Fourth Street 170 S. Green Valley Parkway Suite 1500 Suite 280 Las Vegas, NV 89101 Henderson, NV 89012 Attorneys for Defendant Clark County Attorneys for Plaintiff Department of Aviation Lee Butler 12 IT IS SO ORDERED: 13 14 __________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE August 4, 2016 Dated: _____________________________ 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FPDOCS 32056176.1 -7-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?